if women ruled the world

Couth

I gave her D she got mad
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
8,519
Reputation
1,985
Daps
24,950
...um, in that vein, would you say your black ancestors who were denied education and barred from plenty of stuff were weak and "deserved it" also? Because they weren't just as strong and impartial and logical?
My black ancestors weren't denied or barred from anything. Maybe some of them were, but i'm not a direct descendant of slaves so...

And i would say that they were weak yes. The slaves who got captured and remained slaves were basically the weak, submissive, slow, stupid, etc. Combine that with the the fact that white men had better weapons and transplanted the slaves to unfamiliar surroundings. Anyone regardless of color or gender is gonna be at a disadvantage in that situation.

But how long did slavery last? Few hunnid years? How long did the oppression of women last? Thousands of years. Still going on a large scale today.

And women did not face the same obstacles as slaves either. Slaves were outnumbered, out gunned, out of their elements. Women have been a key part of societies since the beginning of time. If y'all wanted to take the leadership roll or be even with men y'all would have started fighting for it a long time ago. Instead y'all sat around got fukked, got fat, and had babies, Women can't lead.
 

no.

girls just wanna have funds
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
3,909
Reputation
2,680
Daps
14,985
Reppin
BRASIL
My black ancestors weren't denied or barred from anything. Maybe some of them were, but i'm not a direct descendant of slaves so...

And i would say that they were weak yes. The slaves who got captured and remained slaves were basically the weak, submissive, slow, stupid, etc. Combine that with the the fact that white men had better weapons and transplanted the slaves to unfamiliar surroundings. Anyone regardless of color or gender is gonna be at a disadvantage in that situation.

But how long did slavery last? Few hunnid years? How long did the oppression of women last? Thousands of years. Still going on a large scale today.

And women did not face the same obstacles as slaves either. Slaves were outnumbered, out gunned, out of their elements.

I couldn't care less if you're a direct descendant or not, I just wanted to know what justification you'd give. :lolbron: Of course when it's men you're able to see the difficulties in their situation. I could move away from slavery in the americas and bring up stuff like colonization and massacres and numerous other shyt that went down when not outnumbered and in their own territory, but doubtlessly you'd be able to see the difficulties in those situations too and why they were made into victims. Shame you cannot extend that empathy to women :yeshrug:

Women have been a key part of societies since the beginning of time. If y'all wanted to take the leadership roll or be even with men y'all would have started fighting for it a long time ago. Instead y'all sat around got fukked, got fat, and had babies, Women can't lead.

Acting like that's all women did in history. Acting like we're still in hunter gatherer societies :mjlol:

You'd sure like to live in those times, because then you wouldn't have to go outside and see what they've accomplished. Anyway, bye.
 

Axum Ezana

Driving in the fast lane
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
14,440
Reputation
2,676
Daps
29,949
women do alright sometimes when they have help from men.

I have never seen an army of ALL WOMEN defeat any nation. its always man power. so men are gonna automatically be more respected and feared in that area. cause with leadership of worlds comes war.

but yeah women have their own style of leadership. its just most men aint gonna listen to a woman because they don't really have to unless another man stands behind that woman and enforces for her. :manny:
 

Couth

I gave her D she got mad
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
8,519
Reputation
1,985
Daps
24,950
I couldn't care less if you're a direct descendant or not, I just wanted to know what justification you'd give. :lolbron: Of course when it's men you're able to see the difficulties in their situation. I could move away from slavery in the americas and bring up stuff like colonization and massacres and numerous other shyt that went down when not outnumbered and in their own territory, but doubtlessly you'd be able to see the difficulties in those situations too and why they were made into victims. Shame you cannot extend that empathy to women :yeshrug:

What do you mean i'm able to see the difficulties in their situation? First thing i said was that those men who were enslaved most likely weak, submissive, slow, stupid, etc

And the fact remains, when men are oppressed they are more likely to take a stand against their oppressors. Wars and massacres happen because men decide they would rather fight and die then live without freedom. Women are rarely massacred because y'all would rather grovel for your lives. All those wars and massacres happened between conflicting cultures inside short time spans. Every culture has had the upper hand over another at different times in history. Yet women have never had the upperhand over men even once.



Acting like that's all women did in history. Acting like there was no progression whatsoever. Acting like we're still in hunter gatherer societies :mjlol:

You'd sure like to live in those times, because then you wouldn't have to go outside and see what they've accomplished. Anyway, bye.
[/QUOTE] When did i say thats all women did in history? Or any of the other dumb statements that you stated?


Fact is women have been an integral part of human communities from day 1. They has been an integral part of CIVILIZATION since day 1. Women were never shunned by their own men in the way that outsiders would be shunned. therefore women had more then enough opportunities to change their roles in society. To become leaders or equals. In neanderthal societies men and women were equals(also has to do with why they went extinct but i digress). Yet for thousands of years the womens roll has stayed pretty much the same. And only in western countries where illogical women rally for illogical shyt are large groups of women working to be equals.

Women are the weaker sex. They do not have the testosterone to lead. Does that mean that they're stupid? Or that they have made no progression what so ever? Nope. Just means that they can't compete with men. And most don't even want to try.
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,563
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,519
Reppin
NULL
women do alright sometimes when they have help from men.

I have never seen an army of ALL WOMEN defeat any nation. its always man power. so men are gonna automatically be more respected and feared in that area. cause with leadership of worlds comes war.

but yeah women have their own style of leadership. its just most men aint gonna listen to a woman because they don't really have to unless another man stands behind that woman and enforces for her. :manny:
i see what you,re saying but it's the same thing with male leaders. they still depend on the man power behind them.
it's just the way power works. you depend on physical force, resources, technology, cleverness and most importantly influence on others.
 

mamba

Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
18,062
Reputation
3,395
Daps
88,851
Reppin
Underdeveloped Minds Research Institute
women do alright sometimes when they have help from men.

I have never seen an army of ALL WOMEN defeat any nation. its always man power. so men are gonna automatically be more respected and feared in that area. cause with leadership of worlds comes war.

but yeah women have their own style of leadership. its just most men aint gonna listen to a woman because they don't really have to unless another man stands behind that woman and enforces for her. :manny:

Yeah. It's the reason why Hilarity Clinton is even taken serious as a potential leader of the US. People "see" Bill behind her.
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,078
Daps
59,394
Women are worse then we are. They are more impulsive and would react with violence faster.
 
Top