If you win the mega millions, why wouldn't you take the payments option?

HTXBreh

Superstar
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
7,635
Reputation
-615
Daps
19,883
Reppin
Houston Tx
makes sense.. a loan is not considered income so they don’t have to pay tax on it..

Say your 26 annual payments on 400 mill winning is 20 mill a year.. you take out a loan for say 400 mill for a total of 25 years.. the interest paid alone is going to lower your tax liability on that 20 mill of income you making a year where you will be taking home about 17 mill a year and paying 3 mill in taxes
:ohhh: if you right that's dope way to fukk the system and build credit which you obviously no longer need
 

ThrobbingHood

“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
36,836
Reputation
19,153
Daps
257,016
wealthy people have been doing it. That’s where the concept of using “other people’s money” came from. You can take a million and leverage that mil to get 5-10 in loans and lines of credit.
True. Pretty much hedge fund management in a nutshell.
 

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
16,836
Reputation
3,902
Daps
113,366
Dollar in my hand today is worth than a dollar in my hand tomorrow.

There's nothing stopping you from investing your money and living off saving interests and dividends.
 

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
11,681
Reputation
2,489
Daps
42,159
THE PAYMENT OPTION IS 100% SAFETY BUT YOU WON'T MAKE ANYWHERE NEAR THE SAME GROWTH OVER THAT 20 YEARS.

man the first thing most people would do is go out and find the “best” financial planners and accountants and be broke within five years. those are the people that specialize in stealing millions from ignorant athletes and entertainers. a huge megawin I’d most likely take the payments. at least if I fukk it up one year I know I have next year and the year after.
 

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
16,836
Reputation
3,902
Daps
113,366
man the first thing most people would do is go out and find the “best” financial planners and accountants and be broke within five years. those are the people that specialize in stealing millions from ignorant athletes and entertainers. a huge megawin I’d most likely take the payments. at least if I fukk it up one year I know I have next year and the year after.

With 400,000,000 what is preventing you from learning what you need to know manage finance?
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,084
Reputation
4,863
Daps
104,621
When the Mega Millions jackpot is advertised as $130M with a $88M lump sum, they only have $88M on hand to give you (using current jackpot numbers)

If you choose the lump sum, they just give you the cash they had on hand for the jackpot (withholding some for taxes of course).

If you take the annuity, they put that $88M that they have on hand into an investment vehicle where they are GUARANTEEING a rate of return that will pay you 30 annual payments totaling $130M. If they’re willing to guarantee those returns, I’m sure I could beat them. Plus, since the annuity payments increase by 5% each year (to ensure the winner can keep up with inflation), that first payment isn’t 1/30th of that $130M which would be $4.33M, it’s actually less than $2M (and then taxes are withheld on that).

I’m good with money, and have always been a good learner, so I have no doubt that I’d be better off with the lump sum. Studies have shown that most people would be better off with the annuity, however.
 

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
11,681
Reputation
2,489
Daps
42,159
With 400,000,000 what is preventing you from learning what you need to know manage finance?

nothing preventing me from learning, but i wouldn't wanna fukk it up either.
When the Mega Millions jackpot is advertised as $130M with a $88M lump sum, they only have $88M on hand to give you (using current jackpot numbers)

If you choose the lump sum, they just give you the cash they had on hand for the jackpot (withholding some for taxes of course).

If you take the annuity, they put that $88M that they have on hand into an investment vehicle where they are GUARANTEEING a rate of return that will pay you 30 annual payments totaling $130M. If they’re willing to guarantee those returns, I’m sure I could beat them. Plus, since the annuity payments increase by 5% each year (to ensure the winner can keep up with inflation), that first payment isn’t 1/30th of that $130M which would be $4.33M, it’s actually less than $2M (and then taxes are withheld on that).

I’m good with money, and have always been a good learner, so I have no doubt that I’d be better off with the lump sum. Studies have shown that most people would be better off with the annuity, however.

and that's my point. most of the people in here talking would be broke very soon. i'm sure there are some people here who could handle that kinda money, but the reality is most people would be down at Goldstein Financials thinking they're getting advised by "the best," getting talked into some exotic "high return" investments they have no clue about and would be confused as hell watching big chunks of that lump sum disappear.
 
Top