If you won the Mega Millions would you take the lump sum or the payout?

If you won the Mega Millions would you take the lump sum or the payout?

  • Lump Sum 568million

    Votes: 67 78.8%
  • 25 year payout 40 mil per year

    Votes: 18 21.2%

  • Total voters
    85
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
54,140
Reputation
24,756
Daps
252,516
Reppin
St louis
Lump some.
My kicking it is gonna shorten
my damn life for sure.
vN8B4qI.jpg






UKVu0t8.gif
 

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
15,930
Reputation
3,585
Daps
108,986
I’d take 40 mil a year.

What would you actually do differently having 40mil in the first year vs. 550mil.

After buying a house and a car or 2. You still have at least 35 mil left even if you bought the most expensive cars and a $3 million home.
Can't help but think the answer to this question is why a lot of lottery winners go broke.

If the excuse is making money, you'd have to go towards risky investments to outweigh the money guaranteed from getting the equivalent of 40 million a year.

If the intent is to live an extravagant life, it would have to be in excess of 40 million a year which would result in losing the money in 10 to 15 years.

40 mil would be enough to last a lifetime. I'd spend less than 1/100th of it a year. To get that much a year for the next 25?
 

Eternally Jaded

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
8,634
Reputation
2,973
Daps
37,608
Reppin
CT/North-east Caribbean American Crew
The most important aspect of your life is, can you claim it anonymously or not?

If you can, you can live well.

If you cannot, life just got extremely difficult.

Watched Molly's Game, a story about how a young girl setup her own high stakes poker game.

Eventually some mob guys try to strong arm their way into her game just because they could. Violently.

Evil follows money like rats do crumbs.
 

badhat

Pro
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
598
Reputation
238
Daps
1,877
How is that better than receiving 40 million a year, adjusted for inflation?

Will the 500 million make generate 40 million a year?

Nobody's saying the 500 million is generating an additional 40 million annually. You have the lump sum, you don't need to generate 40 million on top of that, you just need to beat the rate the inflation adjusted payout.

And pretty much any index fund will do that for you.
 

MR. SNIFLES

**** YOU THUNDAAAAAAAAAAH
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,713
Reputation
6,580
Daps
83,463
Reppin
THUNDER BUDDIES
DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH YOU TRUST YOURSELF.

LUMP SUM FOR 99% OF SITUATIONS.

ANNUITY IF YOU HAVE IMPULSE CONTROL PROBLEMS OR ARE PRONE TO DO STUPID THINGS.
 

mrfortune

All Star
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Messages
3,282
Reputation
-135
Daps
7,752
yearly and set up a family trust. when i die kids gets a chunk and rest is divided to last 10 generations. maybe maybe million a year down the line. would buy a couple compounds and revenue generating properties put in trust that they can never be sold.
 

NotAnFBIagent

[redacted]
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
33,313
Reputation
5,502
Daps
145,988
I’d take 40 mil a year.

What would you actually do differently having 40mil in the first year vs. 550mil.

After buying a house and a car or 2. You still have at least 35 mil left even if you bought the most expensive cars and a $3 million home.
Time value of money
Yesterday's price is not today's price
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
1,215
Reputation
80
Daps
3,116
Reppin
NULL
I think I'd take the yearly payment. Its the smart choice. More money in the long run obviously. Only thing that would worry me is the state claiming to be out of money and stop paying me after 8 years or something.
 
Top