If you're black and atheist, why arent you automatically considered a white supremacist?

[Menelik II]

If you're black and atheist, why arent you automatically considered a white supremacist?

This is just the worst intellectually dishonest posting refusing to answer any questions properly all over the thread. I asked you "if the Chinese were in power, would that make us Asian supremacists by your logic", you then go on to argue that Asians aren't in power :webster: and then Santana rant.

You are clearly trolling, negworthy trolling at that. IGNORE

BUSHES

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

If we look at the world, whites are obviously in a better position than the rest of the races. If you're atheist, and believe there is no life after this, then how do we explain this NOT meaning they are superior than blacks? If theres no life before or after this, then this life is of the upmost importance. So making this life as easy, comfortable, and long as possible is the goal for "natural" goal for the human with no Creator who judges their behavior here. The cac through white supremacy, has acheived this for himself and his own people. Doesnt that make him superior to the rest of the races who suffer under his boot? Of course they had to lie, cheat, and steal their way to supremacy and had help from another "force" which is a whole other story. And of course, they lie and steal the achievements, knowledge, religions etc.. of blacks and superimpose their "cacness" over it. So in NO WAY shape or form am I suggesting that whites are superior. But to an atheist? How do you not consider them to be superior?


An animal would LOVE to have someone else chase their food down, kill it, and the animal in wait waltz in and eat the meat of the hard work the other animal put in. And whites have effectively gotten the world to do this for them (and that other force that helped them). To you black atheists out there, who believe there is NOTHING to judge the vicious crimes they did in the past, no one to judge the theft of land they committed, no one to judge how they turned the oppressed into the problem in the media's eyes, I dont understand how you're not a philosophical white supremacist based on all this. Mind xplainin?

you do know atheists don't believe in GOD... but most do believe in life after death


you can believe your body has a spirit and that we are all connected without believing everything was creating by a magic being that sees and controls all

 

[MostReal]

This "moral code" comes from what we as humans/society collectively deem as wrong not because some suprerme being said so

and just because something happens in nature doesn't make it somehow okay(lion males killing the children of other males) we are human beings above that bullshyt

and if you are only good because of religious dogma, you are a piece of shyt of a human being

According to Westworld we are really no different. Like one guy said in here. Human life isn't any better than a bug. So which is it for you atheists?

Don't you all see this is meant to downgrade the importance of human life in order for elites to do and treat us any kind of way?

 

[TEH]

You understand white supremacy but you don't overstand it OP

 

[TEH]

You could say that. But my answer would be: "The bible that christianity is allegedly based off of (but not), says that there shouldnt be much stock placed on POSITION in this life. Rather, how you conduct yourself IN IT is what should be of more importance.

So your question, if the person you asked to read and understood the bible, wouldnt even make sense. Because even in the bible, being richer or more prosperous than another, doesnt mean that God favors one over the other. The question doesnt even fit the perspective of the bible breh...

but in the Old Testament wealth was a sign that God loved you. Check Proverbs for example ...

 

[JuvenileHell]

Religion

 

[MostReal]

It's sad, these people truly believe Humans are just another animal and that eventually we should be overtaken by technology which will result in Transhumanism.

 

[JahFocus CS]

Dumbest thread I've seen so far on here in 2017, and that's already saying a lot.

 

[Afrodroid]

As a christian i never try to impose my opinion on anyone, because the word of God comes from above and appears to each one differently, but with the same purpose.

So, believe what you want

For me there is no superior force of any human kind in this world, and cacs are the most foolish people to think this way.

 

[Afrodroid]

It's sad, these people truly believe Humans are just another animal and that eventually we should be overtaken by technology which will result in Transhumanism.

 

[MostReal]

breh they really feel like this. That thread I made about how they get so excited about technology, science and anything that supposedly one up's God is

They go around praising and worshiping the Human mind but at the same time don't realize they are contributing to the destruction of mankind and actually being a follower of the Devil. How smart dumb can you be when you feel that Evolving includes us becoming so advanced that robots lead to the destruction of mankind? They truly feel this is what is best for the world.

In the film Devil's Advocate...Satan calls himself "A fan of Man." and maybe "The last true Humanist" yet these silly negus thinking that they aren't following his path. It's preposterous

 

[Hungry Rabbit]

To an atheist, what is "awful"? What is "wrong"? What is "right"? And before you start, you cant use societies laws of whats "right" vs "wrong" becaiuse men (if theres no God mind you) came up with why "stealing" is wrong or "stabbing someone in the back" for something you need to improve your own existence is wrong. None of that should automatically be wrong to an atheist.

Lol breh thinks he's so damn smart

So if you're an atheist you therefore have no conception of what right, wrong, or awful is?

To be so real dude you need to read more, study more, and learn the specifics of logic.

Like... seriously though.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

and we don't come from Ethiopia either

There were never slaves with ethiopian ancestry? also, where exactly due we come from in Africa from a tribal\ethnicity standpoint?

 

[Black Cobain]

There were never slaves with ethiopian ancestry? also, where exactly due we come from in Africa from a tribal\ethnicity standpoint?

As far as the Black Diaspora in the West goes, no, or at least not enough to assume that the average Black American has Ethiopian ancestry.

The Niger-Congolese regions of West and Central Africa, more specifically the BaKongo (Congo and Angola), Mande/Mandinka (Guinea), the Gbe speakers (Benin, Togo, Ghana), the Akan (Ghana, Ivory Coast), Wolof (Senegal and Gambia), Igbo (Nigeria), Mbundu (Angola), Yoruba (Nigeria), Chamba (Cameroon) and the Makua (Mozambique).

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

As far as the Black Diaspora in the West goes, no, or at least not enough to assume that the average Black American has Ethiopian ancestry.

The Niger-Congolese regions of West and Central Africa, more specifically the BaKongo (Congo and Angola), Mande/Mandinka (Guinea), the Gbe speakers (Benin, Togo, Ghana), the Akan (Ghana, Ivory Coast), Wolof (Senegal and Gambia), Igbo (Nigeria), Mbundu (Angola), Yoruba (Nigeria), Chamba (Cameroon) and the Makua (Mozambique).

According to who? and does that represent current day, or does it represent the genetic makeup of those areas over the course of the atlantic slave trade? Also, is there historical record(preferably African) that states this is\was the case?