Ed MOTHEREFFING G
Chances make champions
Okay Jethro.No, you made an idiotic comment and now you are trying to back paddle.![]()
Okay Jethro.No, you made an idiotic comment and now you are trying to back paddle.![]()
has USC ever had a player get a bio movie?
texas a&m sure did.
sir parker. holla.
when Michael Bishop Kansas State team lost that Big 12 Championship game.Laughable. USC has 10 national championships to its name. These are spread out beginning in the 30s, on to the 60's and 70's and of course just the past decade. Also tied for most Heisman trophy winners. The only other school fukking with that is ND or Bama.
Nobody but an absolute hardcore Trojan homer would agree with this.
What did USC really do from the early 80's on thru the early 00's before Carroll? Not much at all if you want to know.
I'd put Alabama, Ohio Stae, Michigan, Oklahoma, ND before we even DISCUSSED USC as the "best all time"

most wins everLaughable. USC has 10 national championships to its name. These are spread out beginning in the 30s, on to the 60's and 70's and of course just the past decade. Also tied for most Heisman trophy winners. The only other school fukking with that is ND or Bama.
OSU/Mich? Between them they've won (2) championships in 50 years.![]()
*Got nothing against Michigan.. of course an all-time great. But the very best programs did it back then and still today.. Bama is obviously #1 with SC and ND right behindmost wins ever
*unbeatable trump card*

Got nothing against Michigan.. of course an all-time great. But the very best programs did it back then and still today.. Bama is obviously #1 with SC and ND right behind![]()

You really don't even belong in this thread
You really don't even belong in this thread
no.. because you don't understand college footballwhy, because you said so? you guys have yet to present any fact to discredit my opinion. TAMU athletics makes more money than USC. TAMUs current recruits are better. TAMUs current team is better. <----All Facts
So far you've countered it with LA is better (opinion). USC used to be good. (I agree).
Based on what's been presented here, I think its clear that CURRENTLY, A&M is the better job. Name me 1 thing, ANYTHING, besides history that USC can offer that A&M can't.
But carry on with you memories of yester-year.
Laughable. USC has 10 national championships to its name. These are spread out beginning in the 30s, on to the 60's anwriters nd of course just the past decade. Also tied for most Heisman trophy winners. The only other school fukking with that is ND or Bama.
OSU/Mich? Between them they've won (2) championships in 50 years.![]()



no.. because you don't understand college football
I'm done here. I'll let those with more patience deal with this ignorance.Anything before the BCS era is a joke. The best teams from each region didn't even play each other.
2006 NC game was the first time Texas played USC since the 60's. The writers used to pick the NC. If it was up to the writers 2006 USC was the best team of all time. Just like the made USC the preseason #1 last year.![]()
I'm done here. I'll let those with more patience deal with this ignorance.