If you're Kevin Sumlin and USC comes calling.....

OH SOHH TRILL

Trill OG
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
6,011
Reputation
1,538
Daps
13,691
Reppin
Screwston
Yeah because Princeton and Yale have still been wining Div 1 football championships. You argue like a 12 year old.

so the past doesn't matter when its no longer convenient for your argument. got it.

i'll repeat again. CURRENTLY, TAMU is a better job than USC.

you stay on your Devin shyt though.

 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
so the past doesn't matter when its no longer convenient for your argument. got it.

i'll repeat again. CURRENTLY, TAMU is a better job than USC.

you stay on your Devin shyt though.


the past plus the present. Nothing "convenient" about it. Like I said.. you're a newbie to this shyt. Let us talk.
 

OH SOHH TRILL

Trill OG
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
6,011
Reputation
1,538
Daps
13,691
Reppin
Screwston
the past plus the present. Nothing "convenient" about it. Like I said.. you're a newbie to this shyt. Let us talk.

what era you talking?

ever? Yale and Harvard
poll era? Minnesota is as good a job as Texas and better than LSU and Florida :comeon:
BCS? USC is in the same spot as TAMU. big fat Reggie Bush pwned 0 titles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS

check it out playboy. read up and add it to all the knowledge you been dropping.

we talking money? TAMU wins both now and then.

http://espn.go.com/ncaa/revenue

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/05/07/ncaa-finances-subsidies/2142443

we talking recruits? TAMU wins

http://www.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2014

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/recruiting/teamrank/2014/all/all

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/f...yerrankings/_/view/rn300/sort/rank/class/2014


maybe USC has a bigger endowment :troll:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment

Give me something, besides your generel impression, that shows that USC is better. since I know so little, that shouldn't be hard, right?
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
what era you talking?

ever? Yale and Harvard
poll era? Minnesota is as good a job as Texas and better than LSU and Florida :comeon:
BCS? USC is in the same spot as TAMU. big fat Reggie Bush pwned 0 titles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS

check it out playboy. read up and add it to all the knowledge you been dropping.

we talking money? TAMU wins both now and then.

http://espn.go.com/ncaa/revenue

Mhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/05/07/ncaa-finances-subsidies/2142443

we talking recruits? TAMU wins

http://www.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2014

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/recruiting/teamrank/2014/all/all

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/f...yerrankings/_/view/rn300/sort/rank/class/2014

Give me something, besides your generel impression, that shows that USC is better. since I know so little, that shouldn't be hard, right?
This is not a hard concept. It's not a "general impression". The team that won championships both a long time ago and recently is greater than the team that won ONLY in the past or ONLY recently. Does it really take this post right here for you to understand that?

Back on the original topic.. yes TA&M is better this year and last. They've had a great QB. They're historically not great at all. Many of these college jobs sway coaches due to their "prestige" so to speak. If both jobs offered the same salaries, I have no doubt that he would skip out to go to USC. According to your logic, a coach would easily go to Baylor over Texas just because they've been better very recently.

And please stop calling me playboy.. makes me feel weird :youngsabo:
 

OH SOHH TRILL

Trill OG
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
6,011
Reputation
1,538
Daps
13,691
Reppin
Screwston
This is not a hard concept. It's not a "general impression". The team that won championships both a long time ago and recently is greater than the team that won ONLY in the past or ONLY recently. Does it really take this post right here for you to understand that?

Back on the original topic.. yes TA&M is better this year and last. They've had a great QB. They're historically not great at all. Many of these college jobs sway coaches due to their "prestige" so to speak. If both jobs offered the same salaries, I have no doubt that he would skip out to go to USC. According to your logic, a coach would easily go to Baylor over Texas just because they've been better very recently.

And please stop calling me playboy.. makes me feel weird :youngsabo:

except that baylor is not currently out recruiting Texas. does not nor has it ever had more money in its athletic program. does not have TWICE as big an endowment as Texas. does not play in a better conference than Texas.

but you can ignore all that PLAYBOY.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,357
Daps
152,962
Reppin
NULL
Counting NCs when you didn't play the #2 or #3 team in the Nation.:heh:

You a champion but didn't play in a championship game.

Lets not forget the fukkery of two tied #1 teams at the end of the year.:mindblown:
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
except that baylor is not currently out recruiting Texas. does not nor has it ever had more money in its athletic program. does not have TWICE as big an endowment as Texas. does not play in a better conference than Texas.

but you can ignore all that PLAYBOY.
You mean the way you ignored my entire post except for that one sentence? That way?

bottom line -- USC is a more coveted coaching position than texas a&m.
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
Explain the fukkery of two #1 teams being tied at the end of the season Breh.

Dude name calling now.:skip::laff:
You gonna keep jumping around? What is the relevancy of that asinine question?

I can post many more opinions of columnists that use FACTS like recruiting ability, history, salary, probability of winning, etc to show you and that other neanderthal that USC > tA&M as a head coaching job... But what's the point? You'll ignore it and talk about some other bs like you've been doing.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,357
Daps
152,962
Reppin
NULL
Yowionna keep jumping around? What is the relevancy of that asinine question?

I can post many more opinions of columnists that use FACTS like recruiting ability, history, salary, probability of winning, etc to show you and that other neanderthal that USC > tA&M as a head coaching job... But what's the point? You'll ignore it and talk about some other bs like you've been doing.

You the one claiming National Championships of years when the writers had two #1 teams tied.

How is that not a joke of a system breh?
 
Top