I'm #Inherently Evil, Ask Me Anything!

[Obscurantist]

The guilt aspect that you are referring to is because of the historic exploitation of a brown people. There was a time when black people would build a set, then watch white people pretend to be blacks. That is gross misappropriation.

And now white people get to build electricity, computers, smartphones, the internet and forums, and have the privilege of watching black people use those things to call white people evil, savages, cavemen etc. They get to "invent" Hollywood, turn it into a gold mine and see Jamie Foxx brag about how cool is it to play a role where he does nothing but kill white people.

One never considers the other side. Tribalism again.

 

[Tommy Knocks]

these primitive men didn't just start dying out, there's a common denominator to almost all of those groups being on the verge of extinction, can anyone here point out why the Native Americans are almost all gone, or the Abos in Australia?

europeans brought disease. but its not all directly. no one can kill an entire group of people directly, just can't happen. the europeans assisted with disease and killing their food source (buffalo) but if you think they're the only people that have done it, you need to do a bit more traveling.
how did the incas die?

how did the homo erectus die? homo heidelbergensis die?

if what you're trying to say is one group killed the other, that's partially correct, for example bantus are responsible for killing off bushmen and pygmies. this is what happens. its evolution. the best way to try and keep your group alive, is by telling people you're endangered, way before you actually are. It'll ensure your survival for a little longer. people will become more proactive to keep them alive. but its futile in the grand scheme of things, no species will last forever. not white, not black. no one.

 

[Zardoz]

I won't say inherently, but with whites learning about history and seeing how poor/disadvantaged most others are, they gain superiority complexes.

But I'm not against the Inherently movement.

 

[Patriarch]

The only reason for that was to maintain their privilege. They saw what happened in Brazil (before their white flight) and wanted to keep control. IF you start mixing families, those families that are mixed will allow other groups into the club.

Did you know that the one drop rule took an entire generation to pass because just about 90% of congress had some form of black and native blood. after a generation a lot of their physical traits disappeared and they erased a lot of records.

this is what a U.S senator said during the debate.

So , in your opinion , the actions of white people are directed by concerns over class/privilege , or fear of extinction?

 

[Tommy Knocks]

Those are my feelings as well.

Kind of puts this "white people are evil" thing into a silly perspective, doesn't it. Tribalism - that is, the imperative to prey on those that are different, those outside the "tribe" - is biological programming.
We humans have been making strides in the opposite direction, but it can't be entirely overwritten, can it?

well, tribalism doesnt mean proactively looking to kill one group. most focus on self preservation, which can sometimes lead to attempting to kill off the other group, but it hardly happens. most humans would rather just put a wall between 2 groups.

Ive been really interested in south america, because it proves that we're not tribal in the sense of wanting to kill each other. focusing on brazils history, the natives didnt all die off because the portuguese killed them, but rather, the portuguese bred them out. when you blur economic lines, humans will just fukk each other. at the end of the day, homo sapiens are homo sapiens, we're the same race, so color isn't all that important as you'd think. its not like homo sapien vs homo erectus, thats way different. the only reason that brazil isn't ENTIRELY mixed, is because the a dictator in the 1800s imported millions of white people to 'whiten' the country. otherwise, brazil is living proof how the planet will most likely look in the future. The New World (excluding America) are pretty much all mixed.

 

[714562]

Understood. But , miscegenation simply means to mix. By definition , whites reproducing or mixing with any other non-white group in the world can and will lead to the extinction of the white man as we know him.. Correct? If extinction strikes fear in the hearts of white people , surely miscegenation does , too.

The white man as we know him? I know quite a few tanner white people. If miscegenation leads to that, then bring on the black women

 

[Tommy Knocks]

So , in your opinion , the actions of white people are directed by concerns over class/privilege , or fear of extinction?

That's the thing. I'm not really sure why, in the new world, america shifted like that. Some people say there was the 1600s revolt. there's many theories. The country wasn't always racial. for at least 100 years we lived side by side. blacks were free, whites were free, both had servants. Something happened and one group just snapped.

 

[Matt504]

That's the thing. I'm not really sure why, in the new world, america shifted like that. Some people say there was the 1600s revolt. there's many theories. The country wasn't always racial. for at least 100 years we lived side by side. blacks were free, whites were free, both had servants. Something happened and one group just snapped.

which group snapped?

 

[Tommy Knocks]

which group snapped?

who do you think?

 

[Obscurantist]

well, tribalism doesnt mean proactively looking to kill one group. most focus on self preservation, which can sometimes lead to attempting to kill off the other group, but it hardly happens. most humans would rather just put a wall between 2 groups.

Not necesarilly to kill, but to combat, or perhaps to compete with. What does it mean to "combat" changes with the time.
Look at sports teams. Those are civilized examples of tribalism, but tribalism nonetheless.

The lower you are on the evolutionary/civilization scale, the cruder and more brutal the form of "competing" is. But the constant remains. Men form tribes. Tribes meet other tribes. Tribes start to compete.

 

[Patriarch]

That's the thing. I'm not really sure why, in the new world, america shifted like that. Some people say there was the 1600s revolt. there's many theories. The country wasn't always racial. for at least 100 years we lived side by side. blacks were free, whites were free, both had servants. Something happened and one group just snapped.

I know of no period where black people and whites lived side by side in the U.S. without discord. You must educate me.

 

[End Cruelty]

And now white people get to build electricity, computers, smartphones, the internet and forums, and have the privilege of watching black people use those things to call white people evil, savages, cavemen etc. They get to "invent" Hollywood, turn it into a gold mine and see Jamie Foxx brag about how cool is it to play a role where he does nothing but kill white people.

One never considers the other side. Tribalism again.

You can't exactly expect black people to kiss your ass. Lol. Come on, now...

 

[Matt504]

You can't exactly expect black people to kiss your ass. Lol. Come on, now...

How dare Jaimie Foxx get out of line and not know his place. what made him think he can say things about white folks after they gave him access to the internet and roles in movies?

we are our own worst enemy.

 

[Obscurantist]

You can't exactly expect black people to kiss your ass. Lol. Come on, now...

I don't expect anyone to kiss my ass. I don't expect black people to deify white people for giving them a hand up, since we were the ones that cast you down in the first place. But some people could stand to release their grip on the 'moral high ground'...

 

[Tommy Knocks]

I know of no period where black people and whites lived side by side in the U.S. without discord. You must educate me.

The first 19 or so Africans arrived ashore near Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619, brought by Dutch traders who had seized them from a captured Spanish slave ship. The Spanish usually baptized slaves in Africa before embarking them. As English law considered baptized Christians exempt from slavery, these Africans joined about 1,000 English indentured servants already in the colony. Like Anthony Johnson, who arrived in 1621 as an indentured servant, some Africans achieved freedom and became property owners.

From 1619-1760. Everyone (white and black) had to start off as an indentured servant and earn freedom. Many did.