Honestly, besides your first post, ahven't ready anything all the way, because it's like you choose the most illogical thing to start your arguments with and that puts people into "critical" mode, because once you read illogical/stupid things, it's hard to take anything else said seriously.
What a shock. You didn't read, yet you feel your opinion matters enough to keep responding. As usual, the people that know the least will have some of the strongest opinions and make excuses as to why they sound so dumb when they opine on things.
- "Exclusivity talks" but still not fukking or in a relationship
- Facebook Official
Why do you think any woman or any man would respect this behavior or talks of this behavior coming from any man? You would guess that guy to be a fool off rip. You think of that as normal or "masculine" behavior.

That should tell you where this guy's train of thought is. There's no logical reasoning behind any of it.
Never said that there was anything good about this behavior. None of that was part of my argument. Way to lead off with your weakest point there, bruh.
Nothing you have typed makes sense to anyone with COMMON SENSE and who's not mentally a 17 year old girl when it comes to relationships. So what she let's him buy her things! You sound like a chick saying "But we still fukk though!". Yeah, the other person is getting what they want while you get nothing. Do you need any more common sense to be knocked into you to show you how foolish this is? Only a FOOL stays where they aren't getting what they want, in hopes of getting something later.
She's misleading him in hopes of a relationship with him. She is saying that she's not fukking anyone else and that he shouldn't be, either, because she isn't. That's misleading him into exclusivity while not having to declare an actual relationship with him. It's shady as fukk because if some girl was being mislead into an exclusive relationship and she thought they were exclusive because they were fukking, people would be mad at the dude. Gotta love your victim blaming.
If someone doesn't want to make it public on social media, even though you want to and have asked, they don't want you! You can think of any leap that you put you into the "maybe they like me" category all you want, but fact is they haven't shown and proven anything. And the only reason you and co-workers know is because she's basically playing the guy out to you all. Not because she's proud to be committed to him or something.

is wrong with you for assuming any other reason than that. Her side hoes relationship with her >>> This nikka's wants. She wants them or whoever. Not him! Other wise she'd be happy to oblige with what makes him happy because she wants him.
Here's the problem: She claims to "not know" whether or not she likes the guy enough to sleep with him yet. She also still goes out publicly on dates with him and brings him around her friends. She also says publicly that they're "dating" but they are just not Facebook official. Both their words, not mine. That's the problem, she's misleading him or at the very least deluded about what she wants. She has him on the back burner in case she wants him later. Pretty fukked up. She should be clear about where she's gonna take this or let him move on by distinctly tell him that she's not interested.
You are calling me a simp, but the exact game that I run on chicks and that I've seen chicks run on other dudes, you're falling and making excuses for. Notice how you have all these exceptions that make your situation not like anyone else's. That's exactly what side chicks do when they are trying to rationlize how they are gonna end up in the relationship even though it's not gonna happen. Disney princess complex. Not like the "others". "But he DID buy us food that one time". "He won't claim me on Facebook, but only cause he don't care for social media like that".... just a bunch of excuses to avoid reality.
I'm not falling for anyone's game here. I'm saying that she's misleading him. Do you understand that? Should you read the OP again? Are you slow or something? I don't believe any ducktales you have for me, so you can miss me with that, but that's still pretty messed up for her to do to him. It's her responsibility to be honest with him. Actually, I kind of think you might run this kind of game on girls because it plays into your best hand - dishonesty.
Your boy is losing, simply because he fails to make this chick face reality. He's gonna let her have everything because he's too scared of reality himself as well. That's what separates the simps and the side chicks. Y'all are happy with a dream. Bet if he said, if we not fukking, then leave, your girl would feel the pressure to face reality and truly evaluate the value of her options. But he also doesn't want the reality of her saying "NO, nikka!" Right now, she has dream land though. Everything she wants. And the nikka is content with it. I don't see the problem/conflict. They both seem happy with the "what if" and "maybe".
Dude is losing because she's not being a good person. Period. He's a fool for it, sure, but that doesn't excuse people taking advantage of others and disrespecting them publicly like that. People are being lied to by others, and that's creating a false narrative that's not fair to one of the parties. She literally says that he shouldn't hook up with others because she's not. While they're dating and she's banging other guys. You're trying to twist the narrative because the truth of what's going on is something that you can't argue against. Straw men everywhere.