If he did it why no indictment
Imagine being in that 9000 PAGE Napoleon Mueller Russia thread
- Thread starter b_low_brown
- Start date
Manafort went down for issues unrelated to Russian collusion during 2016 election. Nobody is obsessed with nap wtf this is the worst caping I've ever seen actually
Manafort, Trump's CAMPAIGN MANAGER, went down for laundering $75 million dollars he made off of a pro-Putin politician and failing to register as an agent of a foreign government in the process. And he met with known Russian agents in order to look for dirt on Trump's opponent. That would be the news of the year in ANY administration other than Trump's.
Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer, went down for lying to the Senate regarding Trump's financial entanglements with Russia and how they continued well into the campaign.
Numerous Russian agents were indicted for hacking DNC computers and getting the material to Wikileaks in order to help Trump.
Stone, Trump's personal adviser, went down for assisting Wikileaks/Russia with their expose of DNC emails, for lying about it to Congress, and for obstructing the investigation.
Papapodoulas and Flynn both went down for lying to investigators regarding their contact with Russians.
Cohen also gave sworn testimony that Trump lied when he claimed that he did not know about Trump Jr. and Manafort's meeting with the Russia contacts in the Trump Tower, that Trump Jr. lied regarding the degree to which Trump was involved in the Trump Tower Moscow project, and that Trump had had direct conversations with Roger Stone regarding the wikileaks .
@Rhakim
1) the first quote is from me asking if it was true that Nap quoted a gay porn star, how was that me trolling?
2) the initial news story about russia was that it was the work of HACKERS to help trump steal the election in 2016 you said I wasn't. the survey said
Russian hacking and the 2016 election, explained - CNNPolitics
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/obama-russia-election-hack.html?mcubz=2
3) CitiGroup chose Obama's cabinet, you're arguing that this isn't even news worthy? all of this is on the up and up? please just a yes or a no
https://www.rt.com/usa/362836-emails-citigroup-obama-cabinet/
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...le-in-shaping-and-staffing-obamas-first-term/
4) Seth Rich is widely believed to be the the wikileaks clinton leaker...so obviously his name wouldn't have come up in the leaked emails
5) Your last response is just emotional "I don't like you" drivel...I believe the news networks changed their format to cover up all thsi shyt, you don't have to believe it, it's just a theory
I tell you what you WON'T do, is deny anything posted above. I challenge you you do do so without jokes and nonsense
1) the first quote is from me asking if it was true that Nap quoted a gay porn star, how was that me trolling?
2) the initial news story about russia was that it was the work of HACKERS to help trump steal the election in 2016 you said I wasn't. the survey said
Russian hacking and the 2016 election, explained - CNNPolitics
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/obama-russia-election-hack.html?mcubz=2
3) CitiGroup chose Obama's cabinet, you're arguing that this isn't even news worthy? all of this is on the up and up? please just a yes or a no
https://www.rt.com/usa/362836-emails-citigroup-obama-cabinet/
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...le-in-shaping-and-staffing-obamas-first-term/
4) Seth Rich is widely believed to be the the wikileaks clinton leaker...so obviously his name wouldn't have come up in the leaked emails
5) Your last response is just emotional "I don't like you" drivel...I believe the news networks changed their format to cover up all thsi shyt, you don't have to believe it, it's just a theory
I tell you what you WON'T do, is deny anything posted above. I challenge you you do do so without jokes and nonsense
So manafort did wrong and not trump
gotcha
gotcha
So why are black folks invested in this non story?
Double post
If he did it why no indictment
The court of law for the president is congress. Congress has to do it and only them until he gets out of office.
Yeah, let's discard with the report. Why even bother reading it. Trump has been vindicated. Nothing to see here....move along.
That's why I asked you for what? I know you cats get on here with your knuckles up, but I seriously was wondering.
Because no one thinks for a second that you are unsure whether Nap did it or that you care enough to clutch your pearls so dramatically at the thought.@Rhakim
1) the first quote is from me asking if it was true that Nap quoted a gay porn star, how was that me trolling?
Breh, it WAS the work of Russian hackers, you do know that Mueller has already indicted the very hackers involved, right?
Your link says,
And that's EXACTLY what they were indicted for.
The fact that Obama's college buddy was on his transition team was already known TEN YEARS AGO.
The fact that Obama's college buddy helped pick his cabinet was already known TEN YEARS AGO.
The fact that Obama's college buddy happened to be working at CitiGroup while he did that was already known TEN YEARS AGO.
The only thing that was newsworthy was that the documents revealed that they had the whole group pretty much picked a good month before the election. And you want to dominate the news cycle for months because....?
It's total bullshyt that the government and the financial sector are so intertwined. But we already knew that Obama was in bed with those Wall Street guys TEN YEARS ago.
It's not going to help you get your pal Trump out of his problems.
Try to avoid citing Putin's propaganda sites when making your argument, it exposes you more openly than you want to be exposed.
Breh, the wikileaks leakers have already been INDICTED. The emails were gained by Russian hackers, not by Seth Rich. Do you even read the news outside of Russian propaganda sites?4) Seth Rich is widely believed to be the the wikileaks clinton leaker...so obviously his name wouldn't have come up in the leaked emails
5) Your last response is just emotional "I don't like you" drivel...I believe the news networks changed their format to cover up all thsi shyt, you don't have to believe it, it's just a theory
I tell you what you WON'T do, is deny anything posted above. I challenge you you do do so without jokes and nonsense
You think that was a challenge?
@Rhakim
1) I don't follow that thread, so if NAP quoted a gay porn star I'd have no idea...I was simply asking if that was true...the fact that THAT bothered you is weird.
2) You didn't negate my point, for the first 6 or 7 months the story was that russian computer hackers stole the election for trump
then it shifted to them influencing the election <<< you can't deny this.
3) Can I just get a yes or a no fam?
4) Are you talking about Guccifer? the hackers that the russian government won't turn over? I don't buy any of that shyt - but by all means, get upset because I don't think like you
1) I don't follow that thread, so if NAP quoted a gay porn star I'd have no idea...I was simply asking if that was true...the fact that THAT bothered you is weird.
2) You didn't negate my point, for the first 6 or 7 months the story was that russian computer hackers stole the election for trump
then it shifted to them influencing the election <<< you can't deny this.
3) Can I just get a yes or a no fam?
4) Are you talking about Guccifer? the hackers that the russian government won't turn over? I don't buy any of that shyt - but by all means, get upset because I don't think like you
