In 2002 only 4 QB's finished the season with a passer rating of 90 or higher.

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

In 2005 - 8 finished with a rating of 90 or higher.

In 2010 - 13 finished with a rating of 90 or higher including 4 with over 100.

This year 17 QB's having a passer rating of 90 or higher

In the past if a QB had a passer rating in the 90's then he was a keeper. Now, it doesn't really mean anything. If over 1/2 the league QB's have above average QB ratings, why are there so many bad teams?

 

[KOBE]

because everything related to passing is heavily inflated these days and qb rating was a joke of a stat to begin with. you can skyrocket your qb rating by literally just having a good yards per throw average and even more if you don't throw many picks.

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

because everything related to passing is heavily inflated these days and qb rating was a joke of a stat to begin with. you can skyrocket your qb rating by literally just having a good yards per throw average and even more if you don't throw many picks.

Yeah, being a better passer can definitely influence your passer rating

 

[Kimo_bud]

Nfl said fukk defense so dbs can't even play wrs properly. They want video game stats. It doesn't mean qbs now are so much better

 

[GunRanger]

f over 1/2 the league QB's have above average QB ratings, why are there so many bad teams?

if you havent noticed there are only 4, maybe 5 good teams. literally everyone else but the titans, browns, and chargers are still in the playoff hunt.

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

because everything related to passing is heavily inflated these days and qb rating was a joke of a stat to begin with. you can skyrocket your qb rating by literally just having a good yards per throw average and even more if you don't throw many picks.

In the 80's and 90's QB with passer ratings in the 90's were generally great to solid players. The stats didn't lie. The post season separated the great players from that crop. Passer rating using the give most of the picture but now it doesn't even give half of it.

 

[Juggalo Fred]

if you havent noticed there are only 4, maybe 5 good teams. literally everyone else but the titans, browns, and chargers are still in the playoff hunt.

Panthers pats cardinals Bengals giants ?

 

[Bboystyle]

because everything related to passing is heavily inflated these days and qb rating was a joke of a stat to begin with. you can skyrocket your qb rating by literally just having a good yards per throw average and even more if you don't throw many picks.

Yards per throw is one of the only stats worth a damn when judging a qb besides touchdowns.

Bad example breh

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

if you havent noticed there are only 4, maybe 5 good teams. literally everyone else but the titans, browns, and chargers are still in the playoff hunt.

Funny you mention those teams.

Titians QB has a 96.1 passer rating and is completing 65% of his throws.
Browns QB had a 95.2 passer rating when he played and he was completing 65% of his passes and only threw 4 picks.
Chargers QB has a passer rating of 100.1 and his completing 69% of this throws.

 

[PaperEnterprise]

NFL is in shambles, not financially, but over all structure. So many terrible teams and some for decades. Ive given up on the sport.

fukk Goddell

 

[KOBE]

Yeah, being a better passer can definitely influence your passer rating

INts aren't a product of the QB alone(sure shoddy decision making plays a part, but if something bounces off your receivers hands into the defender's hands is it really the QB's fault?) and yards per throw can easily be influenced if you just throw a lot of bombs. Tyrod Tayler has the third highest QB rating among QBs right now and I'd really sure he's a great throwing QB right now. it's not like anything that receiver himself does, like yards AFTER the catch, is taken into account with the ratings.

Rodgers has had a good QB rating in two of his recent losses, but he hardly played well in either game yet if you looked at the stats alone you'd never think of saying the game was his fault or that he was even apart of the problem.

100 or better is probably a better standard if you want one for good, reliable QBs, but again QB ratings has its flaws.

 

[Absolut]

ive seen some stats in the past in regards to passer rating that are truly odd. like for instance this year, ive seen stuff like "throwing at josh norman this season has yielded a passer rating of 22.2, throwing the ball in the stands every play would yield a 37.6" like how in the fukk does that not equate to a 0 rating?

 

[Bboystyle]

ive seen some stats in the past in regards to passer rating that are truly odd. like for instance this year, ive seen stuff like "throwing at josh norman this season has yielded a passer rating of 22.2, throwing the ball in the stands every play would yield a 37.6" like how in the fukk does that not equate to a 0 rating?

Lol who the fukk said that?

 

[Bboystyle]

INts aren't a product of the QB alone(sure shoddy decision making plays a part, but if something bounces off your receivers hands into the defender's hands is it really the QB's fault?) and yards per throw can easily be influenced if you just throw a lot of bombs. Tyrod Tayler has the third highest QB rating among QBs right now and I'd really sure he's a great throwing QB right now. it's not like anything that receiver himself does, like yards AFTER the catch, is taken into account with the ratings.

Rodgers has had a good QB rating in two of his recent losses, but he hardly played well in either game yet if you looked at the stats alone you'd never think of saying the game was his fault or that he was even apart of the problem.

100 or better is probably a better standard if you want one for good, reliable QBs, but again QB ratings has its flaws.

Rodgers threw for 4 tds and 369 yards last week. How is that not hardly good? He played below average in the first half but stepped it up in the second. There's rarely any time where a qb plays all four quarters lights out

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

INts aren't a product of the QB alone(sure shoddy decision making plays a part, but if something bounces off your receivers hands into the defender's hands is it really the QB's fault?) and yards per throw can easily be influenced if you just throw a lot of bombs. Tyrod Tayler has the third highest QB rating among QBs right now and I'd really sure he's a great throwing QB right now. Rodgers has had a good QB rating in two of his recent losses, but he hardly played well in either game yet if you looked at the stats alone you'd never think of saying the game was his fault or that he was even apart of the problem.

100 or better is probably a better standard if you want one for good, reliable QBs, but again QB ratings has its flaws.

QB rating was never flawed. ESPN decided that it was and wanted to make up its own stat.