In 2016, who does 50 Cent hate more . . . Ja Rule or Rick Ross

[Mac Casper]

What? Who the fukk ever extorted Ja? Do you have one single piece of evidence to back that up? Because I would love to see it.

And also, how do you know that 50 never really hated Ja?

Seriously, what are you basing all these claims off? Your love and admiration for 50's dikk in your mouth?

There's a Ja Rule stan

 

[Mac Casper]

Dont care, I hate all 3

Ja for taking credit for Supreme's work when he was always a busta in real life

Ross for being an identity thief and a former sheriff

50 for being in the mainstream for 13 years and having madd interesting shyt happen in his life publicly but still only rapping about the same things, the same way, over the same production, smh.


Hate 50 the least cause he's from where I'm raised. Then Ross. Hate Ja the most cause he's from Hollis,

 

[BulletProof]

What? Who the fukk ever extorted Ja? Do you have one single piece of evidence to back that up? Because I would love to see it.

And also, how do you know that 50 never really hated Ja?

Seriously, what are you basing all these claims off? Your love and admiration for 50's dikk in your mouth?

Its common knowledge. Look up a guy in prison who calls himself Supreme.

I'm surprised you don't know about it or how Rap works, but you are a self-proclaimed Stan so maybe being delusional comes into play.

I haven't listened to 50 since The Massacre.

That being said, my favorite album by the two is Ja's debut.

 

[BulletProof]

No, this is not being said by "ME", you fakkit. This is being said by empirical evidence. This is the core difference between fakkits like you and me, you can't tell the difference between a fact and hearsay, while I can.

Did you work for Irv Gotti?

All of this and almost all this forum is all hearsay.

Empirical evidence? In your case, you may need to look that term up.

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

50 hates his baby mama and his son.

Dude is a psychopath.

nikka

Spoiler: son on POWER spoiler

Kills his son on POWER

 

[BulletProof]

The only person responsible for 50 almost dying is 50 himself. Dissing Ja, constantly bringing up Preme's relationship with Murder inc, and snitching was all an voluntary act by 50; No one forced him into that situation. Every bullet that that pierced his flesh was deserved!

Christ.

Did I enter a time machine sent to the early two thousands?

I'm assuming Ja yells, "It's murda!" when he fills your mouth with semen.

 

[AJaRuleStan]

Did you work for Irv Gotti?

All of this and almost all this forum is all hearsay.

Empirical evidence? In your case, you may need to look that term up.

Idc what majority of the forum does, and idk how your fgt ass father raised you, but if you or anybody is gonna present a claim as fact, I expect to see some proof to convince me of said fact.

Specifically, in the case of you claiming that Ja was extorted, you provided nothing to back it up, thus I had no other choice but to either accept your word for it or reject it. Again, that's unacceptable.

On the other hand, for quick demonstration purposes, when I claimed that 50 was responsible for his own shooting, I presented facts to establish my proposition as true.

Ex, who threw the first insult on record? Who throw the first punch? Who refused to do sitdowns? Who was documented as snitching to the police and the feds? Who kept referencing Preme's history on record? Who kept talking about Preme's relationship with Irv in interviews and on record? You see, you can actually test and verify my assertion against reality, ala empirical evidence. You don't have to worry about my opinion, because your making a judgement of facts, not my word.

so instead of me looking up "empirical", maybe you should look up the word fakkit, because that's definitely what I see from following the logic in your posts.

Its common knowledge. Look up a guy in prison who calls himself Supreme.

>Ja having a relationship with Preme is evidence that Preme was absolutely confiscating money from him by force

Are you gay? because you have to be if you think that logic is valid,

 

[Alfred0Santana]

Marquise

 

[Krazy]

Himself.

 

[BulletProof]

Idc what majority of the forum does, and idk how your fgt ass father raised you, but if you or anybody is gonna present a claim as fact, I expect to see some proof to convince me of said fact.]

Why? When all you have done is speak on second hand sources? At best.

Specifically, in the case of you claiming that Ja was extorted, you provided nothing to back it up, thus I had no other choice but to either accept your word for it or reject it. Again, that's unacceptable.

If a guy like you can't see that Murda INC was Preme's way of money laundering, you're an idiot. Also, you're an idiot.

On the other hand, for quick demonstration purposes, when I claimed that 50 was responsible for his own shooting, I presented facts to establish my proposition as true.

Ex, who threw the first insult on record? Who throw the first punch? Who refused to do sitdowns? Who was documented as snitching to the police and the feds? Who kept referencing Preme's history on record? Who kept talking about Preme's relationship with Irv in interviews and on record? You see, you can actually test and verify my assertion against reality, ala empirical evidence. You don't have to worry about my opinion, because your making a judgement of facts, not my word.

so instead of me looking up "empirical", maybe you should look up the word fakkit, because that's definitely what I see from following the logic in your posts.


>Ja having a relationship with Preme is evidence that Preme was absolutely confiscating money from him by force

Are you gay? because you have to be if you think that logic is valid.

I don't know how logic has a sexual connotation, but please provide actual evidence.

I'm not a fan of either but Ja lost that one. Pretty clearly.

I didn't read most of your ramblings because it sounded like any other rap fan who was on her period during the late 90's.

Oh, nostalgia.

 

[BulletProof]

Also re-read the quoted post for responses to what comes out of your dikk sucker.

I'm not in the mood to reformat posts for ants.

 

[AJaRuleStan]

Why? When all you have done is speak on second hand sources? At best.

First, unless you specify, idk what exactly you're referring too. What did I cite that was "second hand" in nature?

Second, your logic of, "Why should I present proof for the claims that I make if X doesn't" is nonsensical. You provide proof for your assertions to persuade others of its truth value.

If a guy like you can't see that Murda INC was Preme's way of money laundering, you're an idiot. Also, you're an idiot.

First, you're moving the goal post. You originally claimed that Preme was extorting Ja, and now because you know you can't prove such a claim, you're trying to revise your argument as being about Preme laundering drug money from the Inc, which is a completely different assertion from Preme was confiscating money from Ja by force.

Second, “Can't you see? It makes total sense bro!”(common sense fallacy anyone) type of arguments is not gonna persuade me that your conclusion is an indisputable fact. Eh, you just don't seem to grasp it tbh, facts from reality is a better indicator of the truth or falsity of a claim than your word or your common sense ever will be.

Maybe an example will help illustrate the point that i'm trying so desperately to convey, since you think asking for evidence is stupid.

In the world of science, when someone comes up with an hypothesis, he doesn't just present it and say, "Hey fellow scientist, I have a theory and it makes total sense, therefore you should accept it as true". No, that's not enough. He has to take that hypothesis and test it against reality to PROVE that his premises and assumptions are first true before presenting his claims as fact to other scientist.

So if I made the claim that 50 is a snitch, you, or anybody, should first ask what evidence do I have to back that claim up! Because obviously my word is not enough.

After all that hand holding into proving-a-conditional-statement 101, do you finally understand now? Your theory about Preme bullying Ja for his money is not the problem, it's your refusal to provide any sort of proof that is the problem. I have no issue at all accepting that Ja was getting extorted by Preme, if there is hard evidence proving it.

I don't know how logic has a sexual connotation, but please provide actual evidence.

Are you autistic? It was obviously meant to be tongue-n-cheek response to point out my shock from reading and processing your nonsensical logic.

I'm not a fan of either but Ja lost that one. Pretty clearly.

I didn't read most of your ramblings because it sounded like any other rap fan who was on her period during the late 90's.

Oh, nostalgia.

>fukk, I can't make a rebuttal to his arguments, so i'll just shytpost and say he is a stan

Nice deflection.

 

[KnickstapeCity]

Let's not act like

likes anyone.


His own son doesn't fukk with him