The hypocrites in this thread though
And I’m not talking about Kobe fans

And I’m not talking about Kobe fans
That's the mindboggling part about it. Their ages at the time are clearly stating in the OP, yet you got posters in here subtracting years and adding months into the equation to make it look as bad. As @D1renegade perfectly pointed out, a lot of these same posters were in those Josh Giddey threads cracking jokes and having completely different energy.This thread is jokes, got people all over this thread adding and subtracting years based on their agendas lol
Considering the same posters in here had completely different energy when it involved Josh Giddey. Yes it comes off as hypocritical and playing favorites.Some of you sound like some lipstick alley bytches.Clutching pearls over a 20 year old dating a 17 year old.
![]()
That's the mindboggling part about it. Their ages at the time are clearly stating in the OP, yet you got posters in here subtracting years and adding months into the equation to make it look as bad. As @D1renegade perfectly pointed out, a lot of these same posters were in those Josh Giddey threads cracking jokes and having completely different energy.
The fact that the two ended up getting married doesn't change the age difference.
That's the mindboggling part about it. Their ages at the time are clearly stating in the OP, yet you got posters in here subtracting years and adding months into the equation to make it look as bad. As @D1renegade perfectly pointed out, a lot of these same posters were in those Josh Giddey threads cracking jokes and having completely different energy.
The fact that the two ended up getting married doesn't change the age different.
It's still below the agent of consent in CA and a bad look regardless.
ARE YOU SLOW?
ITS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE
FOR KOBE TO BE 21
WHEN VANESSA WAS 16
SO THE OP IS WRONG
It's still below the agent of consent in CA and a bad look regardless.
Is that supposed to make it any better
LMAO
WEVE GONE FROM
"POSTERS ARE MAKING UP AGES"
EVEN THOUGH IT WAS THE ARTICLE
IN THE OP THAT MADE UP AGES
TO "WELL ITS STILL BELOW
THE AGE OF CONSENT IN CALIFORNIA"
WHAT PROOF DO YOU
HAVE THAT HE fukkED BEFORE
SHE WAS 18?
HE MET HER IN LATE 99
SHE TURNED 18 IN MAY 2000
Is that supposed to make it any better![]()
It's not a good look regardless of how you try and spin it and nothing you say will change that.
That's the mindboggling part about it. Their ages at the time are clearly stating in the OP, yet you got posters in here subtracting years and adding months into the equation to make it look as bad.
Those emojis still don't change the creepiness and goofiness of your comment considering the age of consent in CA is 18.
Those emojis still don't change the creepiness and goofiness of your comment considering the age of consent in CA is 18.
The fact that she was a few months away from it when he met her doesn't make it any better.
Go ahead and use those emoji's again as a response.
That's the mindboggling part about it. Their ages at the time are clearly stating in the OP, yet you got posters in here subtracting years and adding months into the equation to make it look as bad.
Keep continuing to prove my point. Keep going