India Warships Off Japan Show Rising Lure as China Counterweight

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,335
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,813
Reppin
Brooklyn
By Maiko Takahashi and Rakteem Katakey Jul 29, 2014 12:00 PM ET
39 Comments Email Print
Save
iSASR.5NNpw8.jpg



July 28 (Bloomberg) –- Bloomberg’s Sunanda Jayaseelan reports on why India wants to renegotiate the WTO agreement that was made last year. She speaks to Rishaad Salamat on Bloomberg Television’s “On The Move.” (Source: Bloomberg)
Japan’s Sasebo naval base this month saw unusual variety in vessel traffic that’s typically dominated by Japanese and U.S. warships. An Indian frigate and destroyer docked en route to joint exercises in the western Pacific.

The INS Shivalik and INS Ranvijay’s appearance at the port near Nagasaki showed Japan’s interest in developing ties with the South Asian nation as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government faces deepening tensions with China. Japan for the third time joined the U.S. and India in the annual “Malabar” drills that usually are held in the Bay of Bengal.

With Abe loosening limits on his nation’s military, the exercises that conclude today showcase Japan’s expanding naval profile as China pushes maritime claims in disputed areas of the East and South China Seas. For newly installed Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Japan’s attention adds to that of China itself, in an opportunity to expand his own country’s sway.

“Modi’s government is seen by the rest of Asia as being able to deliver on its promise of economic growth and reforms and that provides the depth and gives new impetus for strategic relations in Asia,” said Srikanth Kondapalli, a professor in Chinese studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. “India’s power in Asia will rise -- economic and maritime power related to trade, energy and military. Japan and other Asian countries realize this.”


Photographer: Maiko Takahashi/Bloomberg
The national flags of India, from left, Japan and the U.S. stand on Indian Navy ship... Read More

Japan’s involvement in Malabar underscores its interest in helping secure its trade routes to Europe and the Middle East. The Indian Ocean is “arguably the world’s most important trading crossroads,” according to the Henry L. Stimson Center, a foreign policy research group in Washington. It carries about 80 percent of the world’s seaborne oil, mostly headed to China and Japan.

Stormy Seas
Inviting Japan to join the annual U.S.-India naval drill fuels an already strained relationship between Japan and China whose ships and aircraft have been involved in a dispute over an East Asian island chain that has escalated in the past two years. Malabar started in 1992 and has been held annually since 2002. Japan first joined in 2007, when ships from Singapore and Australia also took part.

This year, India sent three vessels to the maneuvers, which included drills to enhance anti-piracy and maritime patrol capabilities.

“It’s very significant that we can do this drill with the U.S. and India, not only with a view to the Pacific Ocean but also the Indian Ocean, where our sea lanes stretch,” Japan Maritime Defense Force Commander Hidetoshi Iwasaki said at a press conference on July 24th, the first day of the exercise.

Island Defense
All three national commanders for the joint fleet denied that the exercise was connected to any territorial dispute.

“We don’t have any drill concerning island defense,” said Iwasaki, adding that the intension is only to enhance combat skill and the ability of the navies to work together.

The U.S. contingent included the aircraft carrier USS George Washington, together with a cruiser and destroyers.

The navies of Japan and India cooperated in a binational exercise from the Japanese port of Sagami in 2012 and the Indian city of Chennai last December. China began its own five-day military drill in the East China Sea on July 29, the nation’s Ministry of National Defense said in a statement on its website.

Japan’s tightening diplomatic ties with India add to a budding economic relationship as Japanese companies seek alternatives to China. In 2012, anti-Japanese protests broke out all over China, damaging factories and shops and boycotting Japanese goods. The protests were sparked by the Japanese government buying some of the disputed islands from a private citizen.

Political Problems
“The Japanese are facing huge political problems in China,” said Kondapalli in a phone interview. “So Japanese companies are now looking to shift to other countries. They’re looking at India.”

There are 1,300 to 1,400 Japanese companies in India compared with 80,000 in China (SHCOMP), he said.

India offers one of the best investment opportunities among eight of the biggest markets worldwide, according to the Bloomberg Global Poll this month. Among the so-called BRIC nations, 23 percent of respondents picked India, versus the 12 percent average for Brazil, Russia and China, the widest gap since the survey began in 2009.

Modi is planning to visit Tokyo and will give a joint statement with Abe on Sept. 1, Kyodo News reported on July 27. A previous scheduled meeting between the two earlier this month in Japan was postponed because of preparations for India’s budget, Press Trust of India reported on July 23.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...-show-rising-lure-as-china-counterweight.html
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
15 July 2014 Last updated at 00:34 ET
Brics summit: India and China pledge to boost ties
The two countries disagree over the demarcation of several Himalayan border areas
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
The leaders of India and China have stressed the need to boost bilateral ties during a meeting on the sidelines of the sixth Brics summit in Brazil.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Chinese President Xi Jinping that India was committed to a peaceful resolution of the boundary dispute with Beijing.

The two countries disagree over the demarcation of several Himalayan border areas and fought a brief war in 1962.

Tensions over the issue still flare up from time to time.

Mr Modi, who led his Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) to a landslide victory in the recent general election, has pledged to revitalise the economy and deepen ties with China during his term of office.

The three-day Brics summit, involving Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, started on Tuesday.

"Had a very fruitful meeting with Chinese President Mr Xi Jinping. We discussed a wide range of issues," Mr Modi tweeted after Tuesday's meeting.

Indian foreign ministry spokesperson Sayed Akabaruddin said the talks had gone well.

"The discussions between the two leaders covered almost every aspect of our relationship... the PM also made it very clear that there we hope for a resolution of the boundary question and pending the peace and tranquillity on the border," Mr Akabaruddin said.

"This was something that was conveyed in clear terms and it was understood by the Chinese president also in the same spirit because the effort was to communicate our concerns as partners."

China's state-run Xinhua news agency said "Mr Xi suggested the two sides manage, control and handle differences with a positive and forward-looking attitude".

He also urged the two countries to launch a batch of exemplary projects in industrial investment and infrastructure building such as railway construction, and expand cooperation in such fields as service trade, investment and tourism, so as to gradually realise a generally-balanced and sustainable bilateral trade, Xinhua news agency adds.

Mr Modi and Mr Xi discussed bilateral trade and the Chinese leader invited the Indian PM to visit China at an earliest opportunity.

China is already one of India's top trading partners and the Asian neighbours are the world's two most populous countries.
 

kj614

You must quiet your mind.
Supporter
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
4,805
Reputation
1,121
Daps
15,035
Reppin
My Family
Nobody really wants them China problems :wow: :whoa: it would take all the nations in that region plus air support from NATO to win a beef with them
Not really. Of course they have overwhelming numbers but they have an underwhelming infrastructure. Knock out a few power sources and a dam or two. A few bridges and some good propaganda to the masses of residents who are tired of communist. :takedat::sadcam:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,352
Reputation
725
Daps
10,727
Reppin
NYC
Nobody really wants them China problems :wow: :whoa: it would take all the nations in that region plus air support from NATO to win a beef with them

Their military isn't that great. Once Japan remilitarizes, which now seems like it's probably going to happen, China is going to be outmatched by the anti-China coalition.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
Their military isn't that great. Once Japan remilitarizes, which now seems like it's probably going to happen, China is going to be outmatched by the anti-China coalition.

Wishful thinking
 

Prince Akeem

Its not that deep breh....
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
11,552
Reputation
1,652
Daps
33,498
Their military isn't that great. Once Japan remilitarizes, which now seems like it's probably going to happen, China is going to be outmatched by the anti-China coalition.

I remember reading a story about one of China's stealth fighters had pieces of it falling off in mid flight.
 

RadaMillz

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,127
Reputation
2,927
Daps
62,367
Reppin
Harlem, Uganda
Interesting topic, I always wondered who's militarily stronger Pakistan or India, I know both countries got dem thangs but overall, which country is better equipped?
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421

India Slams US Global Hegemony By Scuttling Global Trade Deal, Puts Future Of WTO In Doubt\



Yesterday we reported that with the Russia-China axis firmly secured, the scramble was on to assure the alliance of that last, and critical, Eurasian powerhouse: India. It was here that Russia had taken the first symbolic step when earlier in the week its central bank announced it had started negotiations to use national currencies in settlements, a process which would culminate with the elimination of the US currency from bilateral settlements.

Russia was not the first nation to assess the key significance of India in concluding perhaps the most important geopolitical axis of the 21st century - we reported that Japan, scrambling to find a natural counterbalance to China with which its relations have regressed back to World War II levels, was also hot and heavy in courting India. “The Japanese are facing huge political problems in China,” said Kondapalli in a phone interview. “So Japanese companies are now looking to shift to other countries. They’re looking at India.”

Of course, for India the problem with a Japanese alliance is that it would also by implication involve the US, the country which has become insolvent and demographically imploding Japan's backer of last and only resort, and thus burn its bridges with both Russia and China. A question emerged: would India embrace the US/Japan axis while foregoing its natural Developing Market, and BRICS, allies, Russia and China.

We now have a clear answer and it is a resounding no, because in what was the latest slap on the face of now crashing on all sides US global hegemony, earlier today India refused to sign a critical global trade dea. Specifically, India's unresolved demands led to the collapse of the first major global trade reform pact in two decades. WTO ministers had already agreed the global reform of customs procedures known as "trade facilitation" in Bali, Indonesia, last December, but were unable to overcome last minute Indian objections and get it into the WTO rule book by a July 31 deadline.

WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo told trade diplomats in Geneva,
just two hours before the final deadline for a deal lapsed at midnight that "we have not been able to find a solution that would allow us to bridge that gap."

Reuters reports that most diplomats had expected the pact to be rubber-stamped this week, marking a unique success in the WTO's 19-year history which, according to some estimates, would add $1 trillion and 21 million jobs to the world economy.

Turns out India was happy to disappoint the globalists: the diplomats were shocked when India unveiled its veto and the eleventh-hour failure drew strong criticism, as well as rumblings about the future of the organisation and the multilateral system it underpins.



"Australia is deeply disappointed that it has not been possible to meet the deadline. This failure is a great blow to the confidence revived in Bali that the WTO can deliver negotiated outcomes," Australian Trade Minister Andrew Robb said on Friday. "There are no winners from this outcome – least of all those in developing countries which would see the biggest gains."

Shockingly, and without any warning, India's stubborn refusal to comply with US demands, may have crushed the WTO as a conduit for international trade, and landed a knockout punch when it comes to future relentless globallization which as is well known over the past 50 or so years, has benefited the US first and foremost.

Broke, debt-monetizing Japan, which as noted previously, was eager to become BFFs with India was amazed by the rebuttal: "A Japanese official familiar with the situation said that while Tokyo reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining and strengthening the multilateral trade system, it was frustrated that such a small group of countries had stymied the overwhelming consensus. "The future of the Doha Round including the Bali package is unclear at this stage," he said."

Others went as far as suggesting the expulsion of India:



Some nations, including the United States, the European Union, Australia, Japan and Norway, have already discussed a plan to exclude India from the agreement and push ahead, officials involved in the talks said.

However, such a move would clearly be an indication that the great globalization experiment is coming to an end: "New Zealand Minister of Overseas Trade, Tim Groser, told Reuters there had been "too much drama" surrounding the negotiations and added that any talk of excluding India was "naive" and counterproductive. "India is the second biggest country by population, a vital part of the world economy and will become even more important. The idea of excluding India is ridiculous." ... "I don't want to be too critical of the Indians. We have to try and pull this together and at the end of the day putting India into a box would not be productive," he added.

And yes, the death of the WTO is already being casually tossed around as a distinct possibility:



Still, the failure of the agreement should signal a move away from monolithic single undertaking agreements that have defined the body for decades, Peter Gallagher, an expert on free trade and the WTO at the University of Adelaide, told Reuters.



"I think it's certainly premature to speak about the death of the WTO. I hope we've got to the point where a little bit more realism is going to enter into the negotiating procedures," he said.

But the one country that was most traumatized, was the one that has never before been used to getting a no answer by some dingy developing world backwater: the United States, and the person most humiliated: John Kerry.

"U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday that India's refusal to sign a global trade deal sent the wrong signal, and he urged New Delhi to work to resolve the row as soon as possible." "Failure to sign the Trade Facilitation Agreement sent a confusing signal and undermined the very image Prime Minister Modi is trying to send about India," a U.S. State Department official told reporters after Kerry's meeting with Modi.

Wrong signal for John Kerry perhaps, who is now beyond the world's "diplomatic" laughing stock and the man who together with Hillary Clinton (and the US president) has made a complete mockery of US global influence in the past 5 years. But just the right signal for China and of course, Russia.​

Bu bu bu but USA-India-China is going to destroy China :mjlol:
 
Top