Indian lynch mob randomly attacks and beats African students

NBA Youngbreh

DaDumbWay
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
5,360
Reputation
2,790
Daps
25,413
Reppin
The Boot to Dallas
Indeed but the problem is that the narrative has since turned against him and not all people see that he saved Uganda. Colonialism is colonialism, whether by cacs or Hindis. Idi Amin saw what I see in Indians; the problem is that only those who have experience with them long enough can see it. It's like the Ghandi debacle. Ghandi supported and postulated anti-black genocide, among other controversial views, but you'd have to know and study him before you knew it. The average person is ignorant of Ghandi like they are ignorant in assuming Idi Amin didn't expel a host of hostile Ghandis.
People really don't know the truth about Gandhi. He hated black people and saw them as inferior. Too bad the british didn't really fukk him up.
 

Gains

PAAG Hunter
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
10,696
Reputation
1,261
Daps
23,796
I have always said that Indians are demonic racists and cowards. If many could have joined Hitler, they would have.
708653d1404201370-i-want-share-interesting-third-reich-childrens-classroom-you-all-arab13.jpg


Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-177-1465-16,_Griechenland,_Soldaten_der_%22Legion_Freies_Arabien%22.jpg
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,718
Daps
35,657
Reppin
NULL

Random exceptions of Africans caught up in wars they did not understand or else were conscripted into without much or any choice has little bearing on what I said about Indians and Hitler. You can find images of Jewish people in Hitler's army too. This does not imply that mqny Jewish nor Africans would willing join Hitler's campaign to wipe out all Jewish and black people. Many Indian people, meanwhile, wold join the campaign then and now. Why? Because they're twisted racist against blacks and other peoples. The same does not apply to many Africans whatsoever, notwithstanding the above.
 
Last edited:

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,718
Daps
35,657
Reppin
NULL
Yes they are. Better look up the genetic marker. They are closer to indian than african.

No, they aren't. The Andamans are closer to South Asians (which includes some parts of India) than Africans, but Indians are mixed with different Asian and Eurasian type peoples, which means they aren't Andaman. If they were they would look Andaman, not variously with blue and green ees and straight hair and the rest.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2014
Messages
14,776
Reputation
-3,412
Daps
37,696
Reppin
Canada
No, they aren't. The Andamans are closer to South Asians (which includes some parts of India) than Africans, but Indians are mixed with different Asian and Eurasian type peoples, which means they aren't Andaman. If they were they would look Andaman, not variously with blue and green ees and straight hair and the rest.
What a pointless argument to have.
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,448
Daps
136,124
Why would anyone want to go to India anyways? It's a smelly shythole.


This. I will say I respect some Indians for coming here to the US getting degrees and then going home to look out for their own folks. Still, there's absolutely nothing remarkable about India to me. Dirty azz ganges, their domestic situation makes the favelas look like Beverly Hills. They're notoriously racist and classist as expected from any people that openly supports a caste system. Is it any wonder women are so susceptable to sexual assault in a society that openly places more value on cattle than much of its own human populace?

Their food looks like baby diarreah too, and it amazes me seeing how many progressive whites praise that sh!t (double entendre!). Still, I respect them for coming up off of this white society and looking out for their own.
 

ChatGPT-5

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
18,408
Reputation
3,063
Daps
58,062
No, they aren't. The Andamans are closer to South Asians (which includes some parts of India) than Africans, but Indians are mixed with different Asian and Eurasian type peoples, which means they aren't Andaman. If they were they would look Andaman, not variously with blue and green ees and straight hair and the rest.
South India is not a part of India now bruv? :mjlol:
 

EndGame

Superstar
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
9,083
Reputation
611
Daps
48,099
Add this OP
Hyderabad: Within days of a barbaric assault on a Tanzanian student in Bangalore, a 26-year-old Nigerian national was allegedly beaten up by a mob in the upmarket Banjara Hills here on Thursday night.

While Nigerian citizen Orolabe Ibidola lodged a police complaint stating that he was assaulted by 15 people for no fault of his, and that it was a racist attack, the accused lodged a counter-complaint saying that they were themselves beaten up by three Nigerians after the two groups were involved in a minor road mishap.

Mob attacks Nigerian in Hyderabad, victim calls it racial violence - The Times of India


This makes it 2 different mob attacks on Africans in the same week, while they live peacefully in Africa. Cowardly animals.
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,321
Reputation
3,136
Daps
57,745
Reppin
NULL
I'm Carribean and don't know why African Americans always say the above as though it is right or means anything.I suppose it is ignorance so let me educate.

To be clear, Indians in general are not darker than Africans. Some may be darker than African American but remember that African Americans are mixed race and their skin tone is actually lighter than it was when blacks first came to the Americas. Most blacks on Earth are black or close in skin tone to original black Americans. So just at base, you're wrong about skin tone difference. A Tanzania has darker

To address a wider point, skin color or not, blacks are a different race to Indians. My Carribean country has Indians and they have more aquiline noses, straight hair, smaller bodies, different skin thickness, different athleticism, skin glamor, different culture, different predispositions etc. They are, in short, like cacs except not as impressive or imposing (lol). African Americans don't do know it but there are many loci on which a people may think themselves superior to another. Skin color is but one of those loci.

lol. u thought u can slide this bs in there without being called out on it huh? cacs impressive? imposing? :laugh: boy sit ur simple ass down somewhere or go take a nap
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,718
Daps
35,657
Reppin
NULL
lol. u thought u can slide this bs in there without being called out on it huh? cacs impressive? imposing? :laugh: boy sit ur simple ass down somewhere or go take a nap

I'm just trying to say that they think they're like cacs, except cacs are bigger and more capable.
 
Top