According to da Zondervan Bible Dictionary Scholars who are Edomites
You mean the same Zondervan y'all use to push this entry on Ham?
The youngest son of Noah, born probably about ninety-six years before the Flood, and one of the eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races—not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans, and Canaanites (Gen.10.6-Gen.10.20).
Which promotes the Hamitic Hypothesis?
In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new meaning as a few European writers claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to "Negroid" populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. The theory arose from early anthropological writers, who linked the stories in the Bible of Ham's sons to actual ancient migrations of a supposed Middle-Eastern sub-group of the Caucasian race.
More proof Zondervans promotes the Hamitic Hypothesis of Ham's descendants being Caucasians.
books.google.com/books?isbn=0310442117
Noah’s curse cannot be used to justify the enslavement of blacks, since most of Ham’s descendants are known to be Caucasian, as the Canaanites certainly were (as shown by ancient paintings of the Canaanites discovered in Egypt).
But again, I don't expect a lame named Sambow to understand that.
 
 
		 
 
		


 , and somehow Japheth's descendants didn't get destroyed through race mixture AFTER the flood? Right...this theory of yours becomes that much more asinine when you say you can have a Black brother and a white brother, but Esau and Jacob couldn't have been white and Black when the Bible states they would grow to be two DIFFERENT NATIONS and two MANNER OF PEOPLE.
, and somehow Japheth's descendants didn't get destroyed through race mixture AFTER the flood? Right...this theory of yours becomes that much more asinine when you say you can have a Black brother and a white brother, but Esau and Jacob couldn't have been white and Black when the Bible states they would grow to be two DIFFERENT NATIONS and two MANNER OF PEOPLE. 
 
		