Instagram bans Alex Jones, Milo, Loomer, and Farrakhan

[newworldafro]

The First Amendment is irrelevant here.
It protects you and me from the government. It does not protect you and me from each other.

These people still have their free speech rights on the internet. In the spectacularly unlikely event that they are banned from every single privately-owned outlet, they can just create their own, as Alex Jones did with Infowars. And you might want to take a look at the Infowars rules of conduct. They will ban people they don't like, and for less cause than Facebook considered in these cases.

Here in lies the problem.

FOLKS aren't aware of these incremental laws that have been passed over the past couple of years....because of course the corporate mainstream media will never discuss it.

So what you just said is an anachronism, like that Starbucks cup in Game of Thrones.

You're assuming one thing, when something very important has happened over 2 - 6 years ago, that has turned your original thought upside down.

Check out 2017 Nat'l Defense Authorization Act - Countering Propaganda and Disinformation Act right here, I mentioned it in January 2017 https://www.thecoli.com/posts/22822543/

Spoiler

This is why I listen to alt/indy media because you are coming from the sheeplized MSM plantation POV, and you don't even know it. You think you are informed, because you listen to MSM, but they never connect the dots for you. l ain't tripping on you personally breh, cause it's all around.

Let me connect a dot for you breh. Here are the sources, but the ones you just discredited were talking about this as well. The irony of Buzzfeed back then and now:
1) The NDAA Legalizes The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public
2)Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban

In December 2012, Congress and BHO passed the 2013 NDAA, which included an addendum that allowed U.S. citizens to get propagandized by our own government:

"An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill, BuzzFeed has learned.

The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the independent Broadcasting Board of Governors, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee's official website.

The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns."

Let the bolded, sink in for a second.
.
.
.
.
.

Ok, now think about what you just wrote above, about "pushback against propaganda is not censorship".
..
.
.
.
Are you seeing the chess move breh?? Do you get it? As of 2012, thanks to fukkbois in Congress and BHO, they undid over 65 years of laws that prevented domestically targeted propaganda fukkery, "Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns."

So now a 2017 NDAA law is passed that censors media sites. So in theory.....not only will we be recieving misinformation (2013 NDAA) but they will censor alt/indy (2017 NDAA) on top of that.

Misinform - Censor Alt/Indy = Misinformation
.
.
.
.

I've said it many many times the truth doesn't always come from sources that you are going to agree with 100% of the time. I think we should be at the point where "conspiracy" no longer has this stigma. Saying something is "conspiracy site" does not have the stigma anymore.....since wikileaks just uncovered for 8 months so much of those actual "conspiracies" being discussed and acted out.

So what news organizations do you think will not be censored or flagged

Watch these videos. This is the baseline now.

Cash Your "REALITY CHECK" here - 1


Cash Your "REALITY CHECK" here - 2


Cherry on top is this



Again, how do I know this stuff....that's right the Alt/Indy Media....the same media all these tech companies and their partners are trying to suppress/censor/ban.

 

[Gains]

Spoiler

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Dude posted Ben Swann

 

[Black Panther]

Dude posted Ben Swann

@newworldafro doesn't care about sources. :mjlolfacepalm:

Once you point out that his sources are batsh*t insane, hell just start Juelzing that he listens to multiple sources, as if that solves the problem. :bptchallalol:

He's never wrong. You're just not a "Critical Objective Thinker" like him.:mjlolfacepalm:

 

[newworldafro]

Dude posted Ben Swann

@newworldafro doesn't care about sources. :mjlolfacepalm:

Once you point out that his sources are batsh*t insane, hell just start Juelzing that he listens to multiple sources, as if that solves the problem. :bptchallalol:

He's never wrong. You're just not a "Critical Objective Thinker" like him.:mjlolfacepalm:

Benn Swann is an issue? Because? Batshyt crazy, how?

Yall think he just stood there and literally freestyles everything he said out of thin air?
Y'all think he just made up all that?

I even showed that I posted about this topic in 2017, with the sources in it.

Y'all think this law is just a mirage? It's not real?

Yall avoiding the evidence...when it's right there....I can't make you click play on two 5 minute videos. If you choose to be perpetually naive and 2 years behind the law it's on you.

 

[Black Panther]

Benn Swann is an issue? Because? Batshyt crazy, how?

Ben Swann is not credible.

He is not credible because he has propagated several known falsehoods (Pizzagate, Sandy Hook being a hoax, the MMR vaccine causing autism, etc.)

That's what makes him batsh*t insane.

Y'all think this law is just a mirage? It's not real?

This neg is real. :bpumad:

 

[newworldafro]

[

Ben Swann is not credible.

He is not credible because he has propagated several known falsehoods (Pizzagate, Sandy Hook being a hoax, the MMR vaccine causing autism, etc.)

That's what makes him batsh*t insane.




This neg is real. :bpumad:[/QpqUOTE]

Asking questions is what reporters are supposed to.......unless their paid to shut up and tow the line.

We've entered a place where asking questions makes one "batshiit"....you don't even realize how you've been manipulated to avoid being a critically objective thinker.

So of course you didn't watch the videos.
Secondly, even though I provided sources, you avoiding actually addressing the topic being presented

 

[Black Panther]

We've entered a place where asking loaded questions is mistaken for meaningful analysis....you don't even realize how you've been manipulated to avoid being a critically objective thinker

Fixed.

Questions like "was Sandy Hook a Hoax" or "Is Pizzagate real", for example, are in the same category as "is @newworldafro a wife-beater". They're both loaded questions that contain unnecessary presuppositions (also known as begging the question, which is a logical fallacy.)

You also use the excuse of "asking questions" as a crutch to dodge rebuttals of these weird-ass arguments. That's a logical fallacy as well.
Side note: you complain about me not watching your bullsh*t videos, but you never read any of my links, so we're even. :kanyebp:

 

[newworldafro]

Fixed.

Questions like "was Sandy Hook a Hoax" or "Is Pizzagate real", for example, are in the same category as "is @newworldafro a wife-beater". They're both loaded questions that contain unnecessary presuppositions (also known as begging the question, which is a logical fallacy.)

You also use the excuse of "asking questions" as a crutch to dodge rebuttals of these weird-ass arguments. That's a logical fallacy as well.
Side note: you complain about me not watching your bullsh*t videos, but you never read any of my links, so we're even. :kanyebp:

Is Donald Trump a Russian Manchurian Candidate?

That LOADED QUESTION was front and center for 2 years straight.

I'm pretty sure you were a commander of the Delusional Brigade who pushed that loaded question...we have 2 years of receipts

So please save the rubbish talk for a different poster.

Still waiting for a response to the videos and sources provided....but I'm certain you will cleverly find away to tip toe around it...

 

[Black Panther]

Is Donald Trump a Russian Manchurian Candidate?

That LOADED QUESTION was front and center for 2 years straight.

I'm pretty sure you were a commander of the Delusional Brigade who pushed that loaded question...we have 2 years of receipts

So please save the rubbish talk for a different poster.

You're deflecting.

And your point isn't even correct.

 

[fact]

So, with Sinclair having a monopoly over local news stations in the country, and not allowing for dissenting opinions from the right wing propaganda machine, a script for the newscasters to follow that propagates proven lies told from the right wing machine, the RWNJ's in this thread want to make sure every privately controlled sm outlet is all inclusive? LOL. Did anybody bring out the cringetopia that is "I might not agree with what you say, but will die for your right to say it!", yet?

 

[newworldafro]

You're deflecting.

And your point isn't even correct.

How am deflecting?
I responded to @DEAD7 who was using the same refrain about private businesses having the right to remove people they disagree off their platforms.

I responded by saying there is more than meets the eye, and showed videos and and an old post explaining what I meant.

You entered the conversation, by doing so hominem attacks on Ben Swann...but totally skipping around the information Benn Swann is discussing.

If you didn't watch those short 5 minute clips, then there is nothing of relevance you can say in response to me.

 

[Black Panther]

How am deflecting?

I pointed out a couple logical fallacies you made.

I explained why and how they are logical fallacies.

Your response was to shift blame, instead of conceding that you committed those logical fallacies.

Spoiler: You, shifting blame

Is Donald Trump a Russian Manchurian Candidate?

That LOADED QUESTION was front and center for 2 years straight.

Normal people call that "deflection". Logical fallacies should be avoided, and "You're doing it too" is a deflection tactic.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

So of course you didn't watch the videos.

Why would I waste minute of my life watching a known bullshytter bullshyt? That's what happens when you lose credibility, people with discernment don't waste their time on you anymore. If anything he says is real, then I'm sure that a Texas TV personality who produced paid propaganda for the Russian government isn't the only person in the world who knows about it and you can easily find someone more credible reporting on the issue.

 

[Reality Check]

I feel like this is deja vu - didn't she do this once already?

She did something with Twitter when she was banned from that site