Introducing Mortal Kombat's First Gay Character

[notPsychosiz]

It ain't gay if you don't see the dikk

You are headed down a dark and dangerous path, friend.

 

[El Bombi]

I notice they are pushing the interracial relationship in this game as well.

Funny how none of the white characters are subject to this tho.

 

[Black Magisterialness]

I don't need to know a man gets his buns plowed while in play a game about evil interdimensisonal beings trying to take over earth. It's so tacked On. It's so forced. It's so pc. Like ok here faggits look we made a fakkit character please buy mkx


get these faggy politics out of my mortal kombat.

so is making Johnny and Sonya go through their "issues". It's not tacked on because the shyt is said in passing...just like how most people talk about actually being gay.

 

[notPsychosiz]

lol @ these "ill never use this fakkit" responses

Be scared of digital gay characters brehs.

Nah, breh... you must not remember playing Metal Gear Solid on PS.

The boss reads your mind... but really he just scans your memory card and tells you about yourself based on your game saves.
You better hope they don't remaster that shyt for current gen.

"Oh, I see you been picking Kung Jin in Mortal Kombat... Interesting..."

NOPE.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

It's the same logic. I'm X they're Y and Y is different than X so I don't like Y. You can plug anything into X and Y in that formula and it'll be the same logic.

Christian / Muslim
Tall / Short
Black / White
Male / Female
Straight / Gay

It's the same dumb logic no matter what you plug in there. It's just directed a different way, It's hard to condemn racism when you're taking the same basic logic a racist uses and applying it to some other category. If it's ignorant when applied to skin color it's ignorant when applied to sexuality.

Apples and oranges!

1) Gays choose to lay in the same bed as their gender, nobody chooses to be black, brown or whatever. Inapplicable analogy. Difference is CHOICE!
2) Is one skin color superior to the other? Nope! Are heteros superior to gays? Well we can procreate they can't!
3) Are blacks dependant on whites, or whites dependant on blacks? Nope! Are gays dependant on heteros? Yes! Without straight ppl there would be no gays, as straight people pro-create and gays do not. So straight people are their creator, the opposite is untrue.
4) Straight ppl move forward on the evolutionary scale and not only represent the future but the future depends on them for the continuation of humanity, gays move backwards on the evolutionary scale and if they did not exist it would not affect the human race in any way shape or form.


Sorry bud but you have just went straight into fatality without the need for a KO or TKO!

But for the record, I don't hate gays. Do not equate me speaking fact with hatred.
I'm all for everyone being their own person, it's their choice.

 

[Un-AmericanDreamer]

shyt nikkas been playing with Zangief for 25 years. Poison, Lee Chaolan, Eagle, Ash Crimson are fruity. Who actually cares about this?

Lee just got that metrosexual prince swag. Ain't nothing about him gay. He banged the Williams sisters, remember?

 

[notPsychosiz]

His fatalities should have the friendship rainbow instead of the blood dripping

 

[winb83]

Apples and oranges!

1) Gays choose to lay in the same bed as their gender, nobody chooses to be black, brown or whatever. Inapplicable analogy. Difference is CHOICE!
2) Is one skin color superior to the other? Nope! Are heteros superior to gays? Well we can procreate they can't!
3) Are blacks dependant on whites, or whites dependant on blacks? Nope! Are gays dependant on heteros? Yes! Without straight ppl there would be no gays, as straight people pro-create and gays do not. So straight people are their creator, the opposite is untrue.
4) Straight ppl move forward on the evolutionary scale and not only represent the future but the future depends on them for the continuation of humanity, gays move backwards on the evolutionary scale and if they did not exist it would not affect the human race in any way shape or form.


Sorry bud but you have just went straight into fatality without the need for a KO or TKO!

But for the record, I don't hate gays. Do not equate me speaking fact with hatred.
I'm all for everyone being their own person, it's their choice.

The absurdity of this is you're pretty much saying its ok to take the same basic logic that a racist uses and reapply it to a different subject because you're reapplying it to a different subject. In reality you haven't disproven anything.

What you're feeling is called cognitive dissonance and what you're doing it backwards rationalizing bullshyt to dispel it. Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress caused when a person holds conflicting views at the same time.

The mental stress is caused by me suggesting you are using the same logic a racist is using but reapplying it elsewhere. When confronted with this you instantly go "I can't have anything in common with a racist" and since you are unwilling to abandon your viewpoint against gays you rationalize in reverse why it's ok for you to hold the views you do so you can mentally distance yourself from the racist. TL;DR you're playing mind games with yourself to make yourself feel ok for recycling the same logic a racist uses and directing it at a different subject.

The #1 argument people when confronted to this run to is "choice." In reality "choice" is irrelevant because whether or not a gay person chooses to be gay you're still taking the same core logic a racist uses and redirecting it at another difference between people instead of race so in the end it's the same brand of ignorance re-applied elsewhere.

 

[Zebruh]

Nah, breh... you must not remember playing Metal Gear Solid on PS.

The boss reads your mind... but really he just scans your memory card and tells you about yourself based on your game saves.
You better hope they don't remaster that shyt for current gen.

"Oh, I see you been picking Kung Jin in Mortal Kombat... Interesting..."

NOPE.

Should read nikkas web browsers instead. I'm sure nikkas would really get exposed then.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

The absurdity of this is you're pretty much saying its ok to take the same basic logic that a racist uses and reapply it to a different subject because you're reapplying it to a different subject. In reality you haven't disproven anything.

You just said: "Hey I can take any irrelevant topic and apply it to any topic and call you a racist when racism is completely irrelevant"

What you're feeling is called cognitive dissonance and what you're doing it backwards rationalizing bullshyt to dispel it. Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress caused when a person holds conflicting views at the same time.

you do not know what cognitive dissonance is. You may have explained what it means in your last sentence quoted above but you surely do not understand it.
You should not use that term again unless you first decide to do some research upon it!

The mental stress is caused by me suggesting you are using the same logic a racist is using but reapplying it elsewhere. When confronted with this you instantly go "I can't have anything in common with a racist" and since you are unwilling to abandon your viewpoint against gays you rationalize in reverse why it's ok for you to hold the views you do so you can mentally distance yourself from the racist. TL;DR you're playing mind games with yourself to make yourself feel ok for recycling the same logic a racist uses and directing it at a different subject.

It seems that you are a depressed individual and have recently turned to reading less than 5% of psychology articles in an attempt to get a better understanding of your condition. But because you only read less than 5% of it you never fully understood what you read.
This is fairly common amongst people like you, those that are hypercritical and over-analyze. Your mind goes many miles per hour and think very pessimistically and above all cynically. You are hypercritical and see only the negative in people, this hypercritical behavior coupled with a modern western atmosphere of political correctness run amok reeks nothing short of catastrophic views.
For you, the question is not if the glass is half full or half empty, it’s why even bother thinking about that since we’ll all going to die in a nuclear apocalyptic shower anyhow.
I honestly feel bad for you!

The #1 argument people when confronted to this run to is "choice." In reality "choice" is irrelevant because whether or not a gay person chooses to be gay you're still taking the same core logic a racist uses and redirecting it at another difference between people instead of race so in the end it's the same brand of ignorance re-applied elsewhere.

I have given you a fairly comprehensive list of differences between racism and what you may term as homophobia.
You have refuted ZERO of my arguments but instead turned to political correctness in a desperate attempt to regain face.

If you do not know how to debate then do not try!

 

[duck]

1st off this all speculation, those only thing backing this up is raiden tells him "the care about whats in your heart, not ehat your heart desires" that could have also easily meant he loves a chick from a rival clan

Secong, even if he is gay, the character is a beast. Omar from the wire"s pillow biting tendencies didn't make him any less of a G

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

1st off this all speculation, those only thing backing this up is raiden tells him "the care about whats in your heart, not ehat your heart desires" that could have also easily meant he loves a chick from a rival clan

It's not speculation because of the cinematic director's tweet:

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

who cares? lol...he's dope as a fighting game character (dont know about the story mode but it's a FIGHTING GAME)

why are people so afraid of a "gay agenda"? thats dumb republican shyt

Large portion of the coli is dumb republicans

 

[llt23]

I have no problems with a gay character, but I do have a problem with every female character from MK9 getting a breast reduction and being forced to wear pants.

You can rip people in half and all that, you can have a fakkit, but we cant even get a lil booty?

 

[winb83]

You just said: "Hey I can take any irrelevant topic and apply it to any topic and call you a racist when racism is completely irrelevant"


you do not know what cognitive dissonance is. You may have explained what it means in your last sentence quoted above but you surely do not understand it.
You should not use that term again unless you first decide to do some research upon it!



It seems that you are a depressed individual and have recently turned to reading less than 5% of psychology articles in an attempt to get a better understanding of your condition. But because you only read less than 5% of it you never fully understood what you read.
This is fairly common amongst people like you, those that are hypercritical and over-analyze. Your mind goes many miles per hour and think very pessimistically and above all cynically. You are hypercritical and see only the negative in people, this hypercritical behavior coupled with a modern western atmosphere of political correctness run amok reeks nothing short of catastrophic views.
For you, the question is not if the glass is half full or half empty, it’s why even bother thinking about that since we’ll all going to die in a nuclear apocalyptic shower anyhow.
I honestly feel bad for you!



I have given you a fairly comprehensive list of differences between racism and what you may term as homophobia.
You have refuted ZERO of my arguments but instead turned to political correctness in a desperate attempt to regain face.

If you do not know how to debate then do not try!

I said the logic is this.
I'm X and that person is Y. Y is different than X I don't like Y.

You have failed to show me how that logic doesn't apply to both how a racist views a person of a different race and how a person who is straight views a person who is gay.
Instead you're going X is superior to Y so that makes it ok; or Y chooses to be Y so that makes it ok; or Y depends on X for it's existence so that makes it ok.

None of your excuses disprove anything I said. None of it even tackles what I said head on. They're simply feeble attempts to justify feeling ok about using the same core logic a racist uses.
It's like when a girl tells herself she's not doing something slutty on the first night because this guy is special.

If you're going to use the same logic why can't you stand behind your use of it? Why are the excuses necessary?

again here is the formula to the logic:
I am X that person is Y. Y is different than X. I don't like Y.
If you can't prove it wrong then just stop. because everything else you're saying is bullshyt. All I did was pull the variables out of the logic and replace them with letters. You can plug anything into the variables and it's still using the same formula.