He averaged 25 last year how much higher do you think hes going.....Last year to me was his pinnacle 25/5/5.
Hes not a #1 player on a contender but hes a perennial all star...he can be an ALL NBA player but he wont be one consistently.
Is Beal better than uninjured John Wall?
- Thread starter Jermio
- Start date
He averaged 25 last year how much higher do you think hes going.....Last year to me was his pinnacle 25/5/5.
Hes not a #1 player on a contender but hes a perennial all star...he can be an ALL NBA player but he wont be one consistently.
I CAN SEE HIM IN THE 28 POINTS-6 ASSISTS RANGE WIT WALL OUT
KillbertArenas
Superstar
Beal is going to average 30-6-6 this year up from 25-5-5 last year.
The Wiz need to make some moves to get a 3rd star in place before Wall gets back...Cant waste prime Beal like they did prime Wall
To be honest, I'd rather see Beal go somewhere else, 'cause he will waste his prime being stuck on this team.
Why don't you reference their respective box scores, ya know, since you do it for every other player to scale their games?
Bledswole
Slappin and clowning chumps for fun.
Why don't you reference their respective box scores, ya know, since you do it for every other player to scale their games?
No need to it’s simple
Wall was a better defender,passer and took Washington further as the #1 option and had better all around numbers.
Beal ain’t did shyt
You lost again
Beal:No need to it’s simple
Wall was a better defender,passer and took Washington further as the #1 option and had better all around numbers.
Beal ain’t did shyt
You lost again
2018/19: 25 ppg on 54 eFG%, 5 rebounds, 5.5 assists
2019/20: 30 ppg on 52 eFG%, 4.6 rebounds, 7 assists
Now, since you love box score #s, and only view the game through them, do you wanna explain how "it's not even close" when Beal has better box score #s?
Bledswole
Slappin and clowning chumps for fun.
Beal:
2018/19: 25 ppg on 54 eFG%, 5 rebounds, 5.5 assists
2019/20: 30 ppg on 52 eFG%, 4.6 rebounds, 7 assists
Now, since you love box score #s, and only view the game through them, do you wanna explain how "it's not even close" when Beal has better box score #s?
You gotta be slow because you didn’t read what I said
but ok when Beal numbers lead to some Washington success come back and holla at me
The team looks way better without Wall there.. let that sink inI'm not convinced.
What success did Wall have without Beal?You gotta be slow because you didn’t read what I said
Why do box score #s only matter when a player leads a team? What team has Bledsoe led? You had no problem dedicating an entire thread to Bledsoe's box score #s - tell me why that's different? Do you not know how to scale a player's game properly without the use of box score #s as it relates to a team's success?
Why target Draymond's box score #s after a handful of games, when he's proven himself in a postseason environment, time and time again? Why do his box score #s suddenly matter now after 5-6 regular-season games? Why don't his postseason box score #s matter?
Bledswole
Slappin and clowning chumps for fun.
They do matter he catching L’s tho,that’s not my problem when he win some games and get to the playoffs you’ll have an argument until thenWhat success did Wall have without Beal?
Why do box score #s only matter when a player leads a team? What team has Bledsoe led? You had no problem dedicating an entire thread to Bledsoe's box score #s - tell me why that's different? Do you not know how to scale a player's game properly without the use of box score #s as it relates to a team's success?
Why target Draymond's box score #s after a handful of games, when he's proven himself in a postseason environment, time and time again? Why do his box score #s suddenly matter now after 5-6 regular-season games? Why don't his postseason box score #s matter?
