I mean it fukks the game up for nikkas who tryna smash on the first date with minimal effort. If too many nikkas tricking catches on like it has been, more and more ugly broads demand more because they may have dealt with too many simps to go back to giving out p*ssy
Is being a trick better than beating your dikk?
- Thread starter Prince Mongo
- Start date
I was just saying the topic generates these responses. No offense to you. My bad.
Now that is different....most quality women worthy of locking down won't be that easy 99% of times and will have a 3 date rule or some shyt like that. Now low hanging fruit and thots and less quality women u can get on first night. And u def not getting top tier women fukin a dude she just met in a car.
People are still going to form relationships if prostitution was 100% legal and taboo-free. And all these dudes that claim to smash on the first night should still be able to acheive this if their game is to air-tight. Just seems like the dudes making the "my game is on point" claims seem really insecure about the tricks. I get that the prostitution lifestyle brings lots of scumbags to it, but that's a whole separate issue than the just the idea of exchanging money for sex. I just wouldn't judge the next man for paying for it, if she's willing it's not my business and my ego isn't based around their interaction.
MooseMouthMthafuga
Veteran
The human mind is some complex shyt.Any man's capable of some random trickin.
Puzzy is powerful....New puzzy even more so.
Jay Z might pull up on a street walker for a quick, disposable nutt.
You can have all the money and options in the world and still get the craving for some random strange at any time of the day.
How you go about satisfying that craving is left up to your discretion.I'm just saying, anybody's vulnerable
Puzzy is powerful....New puzzy even more so.
Jay Z might pull up on a street walker for a quick, disposable nutt.
You can have all the money and options in the world and still get the craving for some random strange at any time of the day.
How you go about satisfying that craving is left up to your discretion.I'm just saying, anybody's vulnerable
Prince Mongo
Banned
So if you're looking for a girl to actually have a relationship with, you don't have a need to trick on a girl in the first place. I assume that if a nikka is looking to pay for sex, he isn't looking for a girl to actually be in a relationship with. I was thinking that dude meant he needed to talk to a girl for weeks, and take her on dates just to fukk with no strings attached
Larry Lambo
Superstar
Ultimately, I can't how you can knock a grown ass man for paying for something HE can't get for free, just because another dude can.
He may not have the looks/personality/swag/etc. to get the chick he wants and doesn't want the chicks he can get.
Some men may be perfectly happy with the joints they can pull without tricking, others may indulge in some pay for play. A lot of guys do both. Smash the 5's for free and pay for the dimes. Considering that most men can't pull dimes for free (statistically impossible), then if they want to have that experience, paying may be the only way to accomplish it.
I realize for some guys, the main draw for sex is the desire coming from the woman to copulate and the enjoyment she gets from it. For me and some others, that's fine but wouldn't be a necessary element, if she's physically ideal. The visual and physical stimulation (which they are paid to be "good" at), provides enough enjoyment to justify the experience.
I don't expect to convince a non-John to become a John, but to provide viewpoint of the rationale behind the lifestyle, and try to move beyond the name calling and shaming.
He may not have the looks/personality/swag/etc. to get the chick he wants and doesn't want the chicks he can get.
Some men may be perfectly happy with the joints they can pull without tricking, others may indulge in some pay for play. A lot of guys do both. Smash the 5's for free and pay for the dimes. Considering that most men can't pull dimes for free (statistically impossible), then if they want to have that experience, paying may be the only way to accomplish it.
I realize for some guys, the main draw for sex is the desire coming from the woman to copulate and the enjoyment she gets from it. For me and some others, that's fine but wouldn't be a necessary element, if she's physically ideal. The visual and physical stimulation (which they are paid to be "good" at), provides enough enjoyment to justify the experience.
I don't expect to convince a non-John to become a John, but to provide viewpoint of the rationale behind the lifestyle, and try to move beyond the name calling and shaming.
It depends...some women want a man to provide and that includes financial support and being her sponsor. Some women have demands for a bf/potential bf or even a friend with benefits. So some women may want their men to wine and dine them just to get to know them and spend time with them. I wouldn't flat out trick cuz it comes off as desperate but taking time to wine and dine does cost money too. And even some women who want to just fuk want a man to provide the hotel room, alcohol, turn up, food, etc. So sometimes even the no strings shyt will have costs associated....still don't agree with high key tricking but I can't concern myself with other dudes....that's a rich or desperate or etc. type dude issue.
....
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Let's be real. Y'all are living two completely different lives with completely different set of rules. Regular brehs gotta stop comparing themselves to nba level millionaires.
Well Mayweather flies his whole roster of chicks on his private jet to go sit ringside so there's no problem if I do it too
Athletes go broke all the time. So right now you are saying "they can afford that, they good" but once they go broke it changes perspective. Maybe they shouldn't have paid for all that p*ssy.