Is Brock Lesnar proof that some people shouldn’t have kids?

Thurgood Thurston III

#LLNB #LLLB #E4R x 2 🖤🖤🖤🆚🌀🌀
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
12,103
Reputation
4,781
Daps
55,532
Reppin
The kirk to the fields
viking.gif

Where is this from lmao
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,893
Reputation
10,100
Daps
110,427
I'm gonna need some citations. From what I understand, it doesn't work that way.
Citation needed



"We used to believe that nearly 99 percent of our DNA was junk, a bit like "all the deleted fragments of documents that clog up your hard disk," says Johnjoe McFadden at Britain's Guardian. But the ENCODE consortium, comprised of 442 researchers working in 32 institutes around the world, found that the material is actually "packed full of genetic switches that tell each cell in your body which genes must be switched on or off to make a muscle, skin, or nerve cell." Researchers found over four million of these gene switches hidden in the not-really-junk DNA — 80 percent of which have "specific biochemical functions," says George Dvorsky at io9.


Because they give instructions on how to create a variety of cells, gene switches in junk DNA can impact height, hair growth, and even musculature. These gene switches are also linked to "a range of human diseases," says Gina Kolata at The New York Times, including multiple sclerosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and celiac disease. In short: Gene switching could mean the difference between healthy people and sick people, says the Guardian's McFadden. It could also mean the difference between a Regular Joe and Superman"





We propose that a stable environment that teaches men to be men and women to be women could be making the need for genetics to enforce such differences in some ways redundant.

This helps to explain what would otherwise seem very surprising: we can rear sheep that can be attracted to goats in a single generation. But perhaps it shouldn’t be so surprising, after all. Only regular cross-species-fostering would provide any selective pressure for sheep and goats to evolve genetic insurance for their sexual preferences.

In fact, genetically determined traits may even be lost when some reliable feature of the environment makes them unnecessary. One example is primates’ loss of the ability to synthesise vitamin C, given this vitamin is readily available in their fruit-based diet.
In fact, recent research from Melissa Hines’ lab suggests that sex may affect who we learn from.

This study found that girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), who are exposed in utero to unusually high levels of androgens (the group of steroid hormones that include testosterone), show a reduced tendency to mimic the behaviour of women and “obey” gender labels.

This may explain the greater interest of girls with CAH in “boy toys”, a finding often taken to support claims that boys’ and girls’ toy preferences diverge in part because of higher prenatal testosterone in boys.

Hines’ study supports the possibility that in some ways, sex, via testosterone, is affecting who we learn from, but the environment determines what we learn. If the environment is gendered, our toy preferences will be too.

.



It starts from the womb even,but after the child is born what was once called "junk dna" has been confirmed to switch certain genes and traits on or off at different times as a reaction to the environment. So you just have to put two and two together there. Boys not raised in a masculine environment could easily feel they dont need to switch on their masculine traits. In fact men and who are jealous of the attention women get,we predict will develop a gene that will carry on to their sons. That will cause their son to be androgynous in order to compete with so called "bad bytches". Theoretically a young boy with this psychology could have a gene activated that makes him want to be trans.


The major take away is that now we have to determine whatto do,and what not to do to trigger these activations.:respect:
 

Silver Surfer

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,472
Reputation
-4,686
Daps
88,925
Why are you taking it personal? :jbhmm:
If this thread was about black people you wouldn't stop laughing you usual suspect ass pale fakkit
:camby:

Appears to be a healthy productive family and good influence on his children....


Now tell me...what hypothetical situation were you thinking of around black people?

You dumb c00n
 

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
16,769
Reputation
3,851
Daps
113,012


"We used to believe that nearly 99 percent of our DNA was junk, a bit like "all the deleted fragments of documents that clog up your hard disk," says Johnjoe McFadden at Britain's Guardian. But the ENCODE consortium, comprised of 442 researchers working in 32 institutes around the world, found that the material is actually "packed full of genetic switches that tell each cell in your body which genes must be switched on or off to make a muscle, skin, or nerve cell." Researchers found over four million of these gene switches hidden in the not-really-junk DNA — 80 percent of which have "specific biochemical functions," says George Dvorsky at io9.


Because they give instructions on how to create a variety of cells, gene switches in junk DNA can impact height, hair growth, and even musculature. These gene switches are also linked to "a range of human diseases," says Gina Kolata at The New York Times, including multiple sclerosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and celiac disease. In short: Gene switching could mean the difference between healthy people and sick people, says the Guardian's McFadden. It could also mean the difference between a Regular Joe and Superman"





We propose that a stable environment that teaches men to be men and women to be women could be making the need for genetics to enforce such differences in some ways redundant.

This helps to explain what would otherwise seem very surprising: we can rear sheep that can be attracted to goats in a single generation. But perhaps it shouldn’t be so surprising, after all. Only regular cross-species-fostering would provide any selective pressure for sheep and goats to evolve genetic insurance for their sexual preferences.

In fact, genetically determined traits may even be lost when some reliable feature of the environment makes them unnecessary. One example is primates’ loss of the ability to synthesise vitamin C, given this vitamin is readily available in their fruit-based diet.
In fact, recent research from Melissa Hines’ lab suggests that sex may affect who we learn from.

This study found that girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), who are exposed in utero to unusually high levels of androgens (the group of steroid hormones that include testosterone), show a reduced tendency to mimic the behaviour of women and “obey” gender labels.

This may explain the greater interest of girls with CAH in “boy toys”, a finding often taken to support claims that boys’ and girls’ toy preferences diverge in part because of higher prenatal testosterone in boys.

Hines’ study supports the possibility that in some ways, sex, via testosterone, is affecting who we learn from, but the environment determines what we learn. If the environment is gendered, our toy preferences will be too.

.



It starts from the womb even,but after the child is born what was once called "junk dna" has been confirmed to switch certain genes and traits on or off at different times as a reaction to the environment. So you just have to put two and two together there. Boys not raised in a masculine environment could easily feel they dont need to switch on their masculine traits. In fact men and who are jealous of the attention women get,we predict will develop a gene that will carry on to their sons. That will cause their son to be androgynous in order to compete with so called "bad bytches". Theoretically a young boy with this psychology could have a gene activated that makes him want to be trans.


The major take away is that now we have to determine whatto do,and what not to do to trigger these activations.:respect:
You learn biology the same place they taught you about consent? You rapist.
 
Top