Is CM Punk's lengthly reign helping bring cred to the title or hurting him?

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

I don't see any increased cred due to Punk's reign.

But Sheamus' is fukking worse. That shyt will go down as one of the most forgettable WHC reigns of all time, even if he holds it till WM29.

No it won't.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Project Downtime]

If Punk lose at NOC, it will be another damaging blow to the cred of creative and company.

Seriously, why do Cena need so many title reigns?

 

[Ohnoits]

If Punk lose at NOC, it will be another damaging blow to the cred of creative and company.

Seriously, why do Cena need so many title reigns?

Disgrace to win the title at SS last year and lose it at NOC. A more important PPV deserves the title change. Punk deserves a year long reign tho, if Cena had one, why not Punk?

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

That's why I found it funny that Cena and Bret said Punk was HBK while Cena is Bret, yet when Bret was champ HBK got most of the main events in 96/97. I know they did it for storyline purposes and being in Canada but still

Yeah that comparison was so far off. Cena and Punk are clearly Hogan and Savage

 

[Mook]

Cm punk isn't even honky tonk man status

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

 

[JMurder]

Yeah that comparison was so far off. Cena and Punk are clearly Hogan and Savage

 

[krackdagawd]

Yeah that comparison was so far off. Cena and Punk are clearly Hogan and Savage

whoa whoa whoa relax there breh

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Problem?

 

[Ill Lou Malnati]

Yeah that comparison was so far off. Cena and Punk are clearly Hogan and Savage

I agree. The HBK/Bret comparison is an awful one.

 

[Reggie]

I think it has worked both ways. The title reign has made Punk look almost invincible and it will be a good moment when he does finally lose the title. But at the same time the title has been devalued somewhat by not being the last match at every PPV. It's saying that no matter who is the champ the guy who sells the most product for us will always go on last.

 

[CJ]

I find more prestige/cred in a title when it's carried by a legit heel who is mainly winning clean. Face dominance is wack imo.

 

[Grifter]

A spinner belt that no longer spins is losing the title credibility.

 

[luckyse7enz]

A spinner belt that no longer spins is losing the title credibility.

That too.

 

[R=G]

Yeah that comparison was so far off. Cena and Punk are clearly Hogan and Savage

LOL. Punk hasn't drew anywhere NEAR the year long reign of Savage from 1988.

 

[R=G]

I think it has worked both ways. The title reign has made Punk look almost invincible and it will be a good moment when he does finally lose the title. But at the same time the title has been devalued somewhat by not being the last match at every PPV. It's saying that no matter who is the champ the guy who sells the most product for us will always go on last.

Invinicible? The guy's character BARELY inked out those wins againt Bryan. The matches were booked very close and Bryan even beat him during those title vs title matches earlier this year even before AJ stole the show.