Sure Phill has had more rings but he's coached more HOFers than anyone in any sport. Considering what Pop has done in his small market, and both times with aging veterans I tend to think so. Also Pop isn't as much of a self-promoter as Phil.
Is Greg Popovich a better coach than Phil Jackson?
- Thread starter Redrifle
- Start date
Pop's teams have been upset more in the playoffs. Phil has only lost two times with Home court and both teams won the title. Plus Pop never won back to back
He's certainly been consistent. Gotta give him that
Hall of famers who haven't won without him, tho 
clouddd
had cyphers with yeezy before his mouth wired
is this actually true
With all due Respect to Riley and Phil, Popovich is better than all of them.
Phil Jackson is horrible at DEVELOPING young talent. Even Riley is better than him in that sense and I think Riley is horrible too at THAT aspect of coaching but he'll make stars and journeymen run through a walls for him.
Phil has the rings and is great at managing great talent. Riley struggles with big egos. Phil is an underrated defensive mind, too. But if I have a team I'm picking in this order
Phil Jackson is horrible at DEVELOPING young talent. Even Riley is better than him in that sense and I think Riley is horrible too at THAT aspect of coaching but he'll make stars and journeymen run through a walls for him.
Phil has the rings and is great at managing great talent. Riley struggles with big egos. Phil is an underrated defensive mind, too. But if I have a team I'm picking in this order
- Pop
- Riles
- Phil
nomoreneveragain
Superstar
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
Goatpoacher
Superstar
Hall of famers who haven't won without him, tho
Shaq won without Pheeeel.
at those posts coming within a moment of each other
i think pop is better at X's and O's and Phil might be better at motivating players
2006 Shaq wasn't Shaq anymore
