OfTheCross
Veteran
Early being under 23. Later being over 36...

If you have them early by the time you're 40-45 you're pretty much just living for yourself...
If you have them late you can enjoy your life while you're young, tho...
Which way would you go?
	
		
			
		
		
	
			
			
If you have them early by the time you're 40-45 you're pretty much just living for yourself...
If you have them late you can enjoy your life while you're young, tho...
Which way would you go?
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 but now im sitting here like, in less than 10 years all my children will be out of secondary school (high school) whilst some of my friends will just be getting into the full swing of early morning school runs.
 but now im sitting here like, in less than 10 years all my children will be out of secondary school (high school) whilst some of my friends will just be getting into the full swing of early morning school runs. 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
  
 
		 
 
		 forget an age, you need to have kids when you are stable enough to sustain it. People used to have better communities, so the burden of having them was less.  Now, I deifnitely cosign having kids when you are financiallly stable. If shyt happens between now and then, you can always adopt.
 forget an age, you need to have kids when you are stable enough to sustain it. People used to have better communities, so the burden of having them was less.  Now, I deifnitely cosign having kids when you are financiallly stable. If shyt happens between now and then, you can always adopt. "i have the energy to keep up with them" doesn't seem to be the best logic lol. shorties can't eat your energy
 "i have the energy to keep up with them" doesn't seem to be the best logic lol. shorties can't eat your energy 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		