Is it possible to have multiple dynasties in a sport at once?

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
2,238
Daps
62,919
Reppin
NYC
Duncan was hurt in 2000, and they had aged out. They reloaded in 2001 and 2002, setting the stage for 4 more titles
So?

They’re not beating the lakers that year anyway lol. He was healthy in 01 and 02 and they got smoked by LA

Are you saying the dynasty started in 2003?
 

premier58

All Star
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
6,309
Reputation
688
Daps
12,355
Because every dynasty in history won back to back but we give the spurs a pass. They never even went to 2 straight finals until 2013-2014

Dynasties dominate everyone. If we are competing back and forth you aren’t a dynasty.
Were the 80's Celtics a dynasty? Or are they comsidered one? The Lakers dominated from 2000-2002. What about 99? Swept by SA. What about 03-07? They had drifted into irrelevance, while SA won 3 in those 5 years.
 

Ukbrotha

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
17,035
Reputation
1,701
Daps
40,563
Reppin
Naija, London, Earth
5. When did their “dynasty” start?

Was it it in 1999 when another team 3peated on their watch? Was it still on when another team won back to back from 09-10 and then 12-13?
Core team winning 5 titles is a dynasty in any sport. Someone else winning a 3peat is irrelevant. A core of a team doesnt just win 5 titles. That's insane.
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,331
Reputation
7,360
Daps
80,208
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
Because every dynasty in history won back to back but we give the spurs a pass. They never even went to 2 straight finals until 2013-2014

Dynasties dominate everyone. If we are competing back and forth you aren’t a dynasty.
the-giants-dynasty-by-the-bay-november-01-2014-sports-illustrated-cover.jpg


heres sports illustrated calling a giants team that never repeated a dynasty

for most people 3/5 is enough
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
2,238
Daps
62,919
Reppin
NYC
Were the 80's Celtics a dynasty? Or are they comsidered one? The Lakers dominated from 2000-2002. What about 99? Swept by SA. What about 03-07? They had drifted into irrelevance, while SA won 3 in those 5 years.
No they were not. The dynasty of that era was Showtime
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
2,238
Daps
62,919
Reppin
NYC
If the Eagles win the next two SB's, and then KC wins one more, those are dueling dynasties. How would they not be?
I would seperate that team from the previous chief dynasty.

Like the 1994 49ers are not apart of the 80’s squad. They won in the midst of the cowboys dynasty
 

premier58

All Star
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
6,309
Reputation
688
Daps
12,355
So?

They’re not beating the lakers that year anyway lol. He was healthy in 01 and 02 and they got smoked by LA

Are you saying the dynasty started in 2003?
You have no idea what wouldve happened in 2000 if TD doesnt get hurt. Stop acting like a mental edge doesnt exist in sports. Which the Spurs possessed. The Lakers shouldve destroyed the Jazz on paper, yet got handled in back to back playoffs. The Lakers were not unbeatable, they literally needed a miracle comeback to.beat a Portland team who didnt have a real No.1 option
 

premier58

All Star
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
6,309
Reputation
688
Daps
12,355
I would seperate that team from the previous chief dynasty.

Like the 1994 49ers are not apart of the 80’s squad. They won in the midst of the cowboys dynasty
If that proposed scenario happened, KC would have 4 in 9 years. With the same QB and HC. The 49ers is totally different. Different QB and Seifert only became HC after 3 SB wins by Walsh. Not close to the continuity of Mahomes/Reid
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
2,238
Daps
62,919
Reppin
NYC
You have no idea what wouldve happened in 2000 if TD doesnt get hurt. Stop acting like a mental edge doesnt exist in sports. Which the Spurs possessed. The Lakers shouldve destroyed the Jazz on paper, yet got handled in back to back playoffs. The Lakers were not unbeatable, they literally needed a miracle comeback to.beat a Portland team who didnt have a real No.1 option
A mental edge cause they beat them one time with a different coach?

With that coach the lakers beat the spurs 4 out of 5 times in the playoffs. They owned them, which goes back to my dynasty point….
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
2,238
Daps
62,919
Reppin
NYC
If that proposed scenario happened, KC would have 4 in 9 years. With the same QB and HC. The 49ers is totally different. Different QB and Seifert only became HC after 3 SB wins by Walsh. Not close to the continuity of Mahomes/Reid
Once a team 3 peats on your watch your dynasty is over and a new one potentially starts. We are now in the midst of an eagles dynasty.
 
Top