Is it possible to have multiple dynasties in a sport at once?

[UpAndComing]

Yankees - 1998 - 2000
Lakers - 2000 - 2002


Packers - 1960s
Celtics - 1960s

They were Dynasties at the same time

 

[premier58]

Destroyed??!? The series went 6 and then the Lakers promptly beat them the following year.

The close out game was a 28 point thrashing. Thats what I was referring to.

 

[Boonapalist]

Where do you start and end the Spurs dynasty at? At 99-07 03-07 or 03-14?

And no the Celtics in the 80’s weren’t a dynasty

 

[CHICAGO]

Where do you start and end the Spurs dynasty at? At 99-07 03-07 or 03-14?

And no the Celtics in the 80’s weren’t a dynasty

OBVIOUSLY THE 4 TITLES IN 9 SEASONS



​

 

[Professor K.]

Lowkey, Clemson getting 2 rings and 2 more championship game appearances in the middle of Saban at Alabama kinda counts

 

[KnickstapeCity]

SPURS WON 4 TITLES
FROM 99 TO 07....

LAKERS WON 3 IN THE SAME SPAN.



​

This breh got a big dikk

 

[premier58]

Lowkey, Clemson getting 2 rings and 2 more championship game appearances in the middle of Saban at Alabama kinda counts

Excellent mention. I was gonna mention that. As a matter of fact, due to the 4 year window of CFB, dynasties should be two within a certain time frame for them. There is no way that Nebeaska(94,95) isnt a dynasty. Those you can add 97 to get that 3rd ring. USC from 03-05, is a dynasty. 2 titles and an additional NC loss. If the U beats OSU in 2002, they woudlve been a dynasty, too. Urban Meyer Gators from 2006 to 2009, should be classified as a dynasty, also.

 

[BucciMane]

Name a team that is undeservedly deemed a dtnasty...

Again, I'm just saying people seem to want to say anything is a dynasty nowadays. Let me put these teams below, and let me know which you think are dynasties and which are not, and then I'll let you know what I believe.

SF Giants: 2010-2016
Dodgers 2020-2024

Red Wings: 1997-2002
Devils: 1995-2003
Blackhawks: 2010-2015

Honorable NHL mention: Penguins 2016-2018 and Lightning 2020-2022. Only mentioning both as they won back to back.

Late 90's Broncos
Chiefs: 2019-present

Spurs: 1999-2007
Heat: 2011-2015

 

[BucciMane]

Would you consider a team a dynasty if TWO other teams won MULTIPLE Championships during the reign of the "dynasty"?

 

[premier58]

Again, I'm just saying people seem to want to say anything is a dynasty nowadays. Let me put these teams below, and let me know which you think are dynasties and which are not, and then I'll let you know what I believe.

SF Giants: 2010-2016
Dodgers 2020-2024

Red Wings: 1997-2002
Devils: 1995-2003
Blackhawks: 2010-2015

Honorable NHL mention: Penguins 2016-2018 and Lightning 2020-2022. Only mentioning both as they won back to back.

Late 90's Broncos
Chiefs: 2019-present

Spurs: 1999-2007
Heat: 2011-2015

SFG-yes. To cash in three times in a 5 year window is certified greatness. Look at how many times the Braves failed to do so. Look at how Cleveland and Seattle couldnt win one. Look at those great late.70's to mid 80's Royals teams who only won one. Look at the loaded Mets team in the mid to late 80's or the late 80's to early 99's A's team who only cashed in once

LAD- no. If they win this year they will become one.
Red Wings-hell yes. You can include 95 and 96. 95 was a SCF app and 96, they set the record for most wins ever in an NHL season to that point, with 62.
NJD-yes. They beat a soon to be legendary Red Wings team for their first Cup. Beat a great Dallas team going for the back to.back, for their second Cup. Dont forget they made another Finals run losing a.tough Finals to a great Avalance team. Yes, they are a dynasty.
Blackhawks-yes.

If you include the Penguins from 2008-2018, I would say yes. 3 cups and another SCF loss.

Broncos-no. Didnt have a long enough run.
Chiefs- of course! 7 consec AFC title appearances, 5 SB berths and 3 Lombardis?!?! Unquestionable!!
Spurs-yes, without a doubt.
Heat-no. They needed one more title

 

[Controversy]

SPURS WON 4 TITLES
FROM 99 TO 07....

LAKERS WON 3 IN THE SAME SPAN.



​

The Lakers won 5 titles from 00-10 and made the finals 7x

The Spurs made 3 finals 00-10 and won 3 titles

 

[BucciMane]

SFG-yes. To cash in three times in a 5 year window is certified greatness. Look at how many times the Braves failed to do so. Look at how Cleveland and Seattle couldnt win one. Look at those great late.70's to mid 80's Royals teams who only won one. Look at the loaded Mets team in the mid to late 80's or the late 80's to early 99's A's team who only cashed in once

LAD- no. If they win this year they will become one.
Red Wings-hell yes. You can include 95 and 96. 95 was a SCF app and 96, they set the record for most wins ever in an NHL season to that point, with 62.
NJD-yes. They beat a soon to be legendary Red Wings team for their first Cup. Beat a great Dallas team going for the back to.back, for their second Cup. Dont forget they made another Finals run losing a.tough Finals to a great Avalance team. Yes, they are a dynasty.
Blackhawks-yes.

If you include the Penguins from 2008-2018, I would say yes. 3 cups and another SCF loss.

Broncos-no. Didnt have a long enough run.
Chiefs- of course! 7 consec AFC title appearances, 5 SB berths and 3 Lombardis?!?! Unquestionable!!
Spurs-yes, without a doubt.
Heat-no. They needed one more title

I'm not saying this team was NOT a dynasty, and I know this would be a very controversial take, but what about the 1980's-1990's 49er's? Not saying they were not a dynasty, but TWO teams won MULTIPLE Super Bowls during their reign........

 

[CHICAGO]

The Lakers won 5 titles from 00-10 and made the finals 7x

The Spurs made 3 finals 00-10 and won 3 titles

YOU CONFUSED?

NO ONE, NOT EVEN THE OP
IS MERGING THE SHAQ/KOBE LAKERS
WITH THE KOBE/PAU LAKERS



​

 

[Hey_zeus]

You're missing the the pre super bowl dynasties

The 1930-1939 Packers
The monsters of the midway, the 1940-1947 Chicago Bears

There can be multiple dynasties at the same time. Or right beside each other.

The 50s too with the Browns, Lions, and Colts all winning multiple chips. Giants also won one with a half dozen appearances in title games. Definitely can be multiple dynasties at once.

 

[Controversy]

YOU CONFUSED?

NO ONE, NOT EVEN THE OP
IS MERGING THE SHAQ/KOBE LAKERS
WITH THE KOBE/PAU LAKERS



​

The Pats are a 6x SB winning dynasty bc of Tom & Bill

The Lakers are a 5x Finals winning dynasty bc of Bean & Phil