The Pats are a 6x SB winning dynasty bc of Tom & Bill
The Lakers are a 5x Finals winning dynasty bc of Bean & Phil

THE PATS HAVE 2 DYNASTIES.
LMAO @ CLAIMING THE PATS
HAVE AN 18 YEAR DYNASTY.
THEY WENT 10 YRS
WITHOUT WINNING A TITLE


The Pats are a 6x SB winning dynasty bc of Tom & Bill
The Lakers are a 5x Finals winning dynasty bc of Bean & Phil
There was only one dynasty in the 1980’s and it was Showtime lakers.
NO THEY ARENT
THE PATS HAVE 2 DYNASTIES.
LMAO @ CLAIMING THE PATS
HAVE AN 18 YEAR DYNASTY.
THEY WENT 10 YRS
WITHOUT WINNING A TITLE
Interpret it how you want
It's the Pats dynasty, not dynasties
It's the 2000s Lakers dynasty, not dynasties
1. THE KOBE/PAU LAKERS
ARENT A DYNASTY
SO OF COURSE ITS NOT "DYNASTIES"
2. LMAO @ CLAIMING A TEAM
THAT WENT 10 YEARS WITHOUT WINNING
A SUPER BOWL WAS ONE LONG ASS DYNASTY
How many players on the Spurs 99 team were on their 07 team?????????
Is 07 a continuation of the start of their 99 run![]()
Its not controversial, its lunacy!! No one has ever questioned the dynasty status of the 80's.49ersI'm not saying this team was NOT a dynasty, and I know this would be a very controversial take, but what about the 1980's-1990's 49er's? Not saying they were not a dynasty, but TWO teams won MULTIPLE Super Bowls during their reign........