Dawg you're questioning my blackness because I learned music from a modern teacher. You're on the same coin hipster cacs are on. This is why even music reviews from non musicians suck. Are music teachers supposed not supposed to pass shyt down? i did learn to bend notes from a black man come on now
You're calling me out for being pretentious I guess but there you go doing the same thing. Joining in jamming, experienced or not is a deep music conversation. Talking is shallow because techniques are for cacs right
technique is cool when it's not couched in exclusion. western art works that way and it's even more evident when it encroaches upon black spaces.
the streets is one of the only places my ppl's art can thrive without a false sense of judgement.
imo technique should be measured after the fact that something worthy of being measured has occurred.
but in western art, if you didn't follow the predicated criteria in the first place, you won't even get observed.
for instance, i've seen ppl come into the studio with little technical experience, but a high degree of "technical ability" in merely the fact that they did something completely new. that is the essence of humanity and life or even a glimpse into freedom. they gave me something new to measure and reproduce in my own way.
i believe what im getting at is the scientific method. yes, that is a western concept, but it is rarely employed within the spirit of modern western science. the fact that science is often upheld as an alternative to religion is a testament to backwards observation techniques popular in intellectual circles today.
rock music is suppose to be simple. for example, the bo diddley beat. its complex in its simplicity.
thats what i like about insides out. that's what i like about music. if it's truly terrible, i have no desire to describe it. just destroy it. that's why you'll rarely see me in a logic thread.
but good music to me inspires various forms of meaning. for many ppl here, it's a reason to uphold cobain's legacy as if a lot of bleach wasn't a bunch of repetitive cacophony.
for me, it's what makes sb2h so special. many of y'all see it as pastiche, but i see brave originality.
cobain often obscured himself in lofty metaphors where cudi decided to strip his words of far reaching metaphors keeping him in the tradition of many seminal works in soul and hip-hop. the loftiness is in the lyricism and not the words themselves, so him using that style in a completely different world is bound to come off as cringy sometimes.
sb2h cannot be broken down traditionally the same way many hip-hop classics cannot be broken down in a classroom. there's not even a name in institutions for what these dudes have been doing for a long fukkin time now.
i know this diatribe is loaded and im not unpacking it, so it's cool if u joined team didn't read a while ago. it was jus good to discuss this, even if it comes out one sided.