He's in his feelings in two threads;I think he's having a nervous breakdown in the Trump/Russia thread
Is Napoleon a Republican agent?
- Thread starter southpawstyle
- Start date
I think he's having a nervous breakdown in the Trump/Russia thread
He thinks that it's his thread alone because he created and actively curates it.
Forget the people who contribute to it to make it what it is.
http://www.thecoli.com/posts/25234752/He thinks that it's his thread alone because he created and actively curates it.
Forget the people who contribute to it to make it what it is.
Done.
I figured you could respect the fact an independent, albeit conservative, journalist had a unique insight to Trump-Russia. But you can't handle merely the information segment without finding reasons to make sure she makes you feel good about yourself.
Oh, and your criticism about being incongruent with MSM is bullshyt. MSM drops leads on stories all the time. And MSM merely would either corroborate or ignore whatever she posts. They're mutually exclusive.
And another thing. Malcolm Nance, a guy I've followed for about 3 years, seems to be bullshytting about his knowledge of Russian counterintelligence. Just like Naveed Jamali (I've read his book). Deal with it.
However, many of the stories she posts are either later corroborated OR when published match existing rumors at the time.
If you don't like it, stick to the front pages of newspapers. Don't troll my thread asking for both journalistic AND moral congruency.
It's obvious he is unemployed.
This is laughable
Don't misquote me, son. :bpufedup:
I said clearly that Mensch's conservatism isn't the issue. It's the fact that her inconsistency on important facts is polluting the actual reporting on this story. She's gotten as many stories wrong as she's gotten right.
At the very least, MSM sources with journalistic integrity will do retractions, updates, and corrections if someone points out they got something wrong. Mensch just blocks her dissenters on Twitter and tries to talk s#it about them.
So what?
She posts what she wants and updates stories with new information.
Its ironic you all have a distrust of MSM, yet hold it as the gold standard without ignoring the fact that if you post anything contradictory to MSM, then you ignore any conflict in favor of MSM>
She's not my standard. She's merely someone who has proven they can post some independent content that is relevant and informs the debate in a unique way. If MSM never broaches her topics, that doesn't mean she's wrong.
And you can't say she's gotten anything wrong. MSM not reporting on what she said is not "getting something wrong"
NYTimes has egg on its face for that "no FBI investigation" story pre-election.
headbutt a rifleYou do not carry yourself like a coastal elite
Laughable? It's actually kind of sad.This is laughable
You're obviously autistic and unemployed.
I don't lump all MSM into one category. :mjstare:
Also, here's my personal go-to sources for news (in no particular order):
Least Biased/Neutral ():
-Associated Press
-Reuters
-Pew Research
Very Good Journalism, Low/Moderate Bias ():
-NPR (National Public Radio)
-The Wall Street Journal
-USA Today
-BBC
-The Independent
-ProPublica
-The Economist
-The Hill
Fairly Biased, Mostly Decent Journalism ():
-The New York Times
-Washington Post
-NBC News
-CBS News
-The Atlantic
-Forbes
-Business Insider
-Local News
-Los Angeles Times
-Politico
Mostly Biased ():
-CNN
-Fox News
-MSNBC
-Huffington Post
-Daily Beast
-Washington Times
-New York Post
-Vox
-ShareBlue
-Newsmax
Biased, Sensationalist Journalism ():
-Breitbart
-Daily Kos
-Drudge Report
-Occupy Democrats
-PoliticusUSA
-Addicting Info
-Buzzfeed
-NowThis News
-The Young Turks
STAY AWAY ():
-RT (Russian Times)
-National Enquirer
-InfoWars.com
-PrisonPlanet.com
-Amateur opinion blogs/vlogs
-Personal opinions
He called me one as a pejorative. I'm likeYou do not carry yourself like a coastal elite
.
Do you want a W2 or somethingLaughable? It's actually kind of sad.
You're obviously autistic and unemployed.
fukk outta here