Trumps rallies primarily make up of old white people. Rallies don't equate to likely voters.

I still say Hillary wins Florida and makes all this shyt moot.![]()
I actually agree with you. I think the latinos in florida are going to give her a close victory there..i heard somewhere that 60-70% of florida votes will already be in by tuesday (unsure how accurate) but it still might be a late night with that count

Personally I think some real fukkery is going to go down in North Carolina, especially since I'm already hearing a bunch of shyt about voter suppression down there.![]()


New hispanic voters in FL have surged compared to new white voters. The early voting is showing hispanic turnout is strong so far--significantly outpacing 2012. Hillary is polling 30 points ahead among FL hispanics.Honestly Florida is a tossup, but I think Trump wins it. But I still think Hillary will just barely squeak by anyway with the map looking something like this -
![]()
Gonna be a photo finish IMO. I wouldn't be surprised if we still don't know who the winner is by Wednesday morning.
he gives Hillary 98% chance of winningIn 2004, Wang was one of the first to aggregate US Presidential polls using probabilistic methods.[10] The method's applications included correct Election-Eve predictions, high-resolution tracking of the race during the campaign, and identification of targets for resource allocation. Wang's calculation, based on polls only, ended up precisely at the actual electoral outcome, Bush 286, Kerry 252 EV. In 2008, Wang and Andrew Ferguson founded the Princeton Election Consortium blog, in which he analyzes U.S. national election polling.[11][12] His statistical analysis in 2012 correctly predicted the presidential vote outcome in 49 of 50 states and even the popular vote outcome of Barack Obama's 51.1% to Mitt Romney's 48.9%.[13] That year, the Princeton Election Consortium also correctly called 10 out of 10 close Senate races and came within a few seats of the final House outcome.


Quite possible..who knows.
I wish i still smoked trees..im off on election day and i would love to get high off my ass to witness all the fukkery on the news. I already voted so imma be chillin like![]()


There's also thisdont trust 538 they make the election seem closer than it really is and 538 is for profit anyways
i thought they were legit but i talked to some people they say hes not the best
apparently the most thorough pollster is Sam Wang, and his site is nonprofit.
Princeton Election Consortium — A first draft of electoral history. Since 2004
he gives Hillary 98% chance of winning
Nate Silver is finessing for page clicks by making Florida change colors throughout the day and shyt![]()
This was my map too, but Trump has no ground game and that can count for another 1 to 2 points so he might fukk around and lose by more than he should because of it. I wouldn't be surprised if that led to Ls in all of the swing states.Honestly Florida is a tossup, but I think Trump wins it. But I still think Hillary will just barely squeak by anyway with the map looking something like this -
![]()
Gonna be a photo finish IMO. I wouldn't be surprised if we still don't know who the winner is by Wednesday morning.
Could America be dumb enought to elect that clown?
![]()
Because even if that were true, which it isnt, rally attendees doesnt equal votes castShe can barely get 300 people at her rallys and that includes payed union workers, meanwhile cross town trump got like 30000, how is this even close?