Is one a racist if he/she denies the Jewish Holauchaust?

notPsychosiz

I started this gangsta sh-
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
7,638
Reputation
2,911
Daps
21,913
Reppin
dogbornwolf
As a person that likes to be thorough and accurate... I can tell you that the holocaust triggers all sorts of red flags off the bat.
First, its not even called holocaust. :dead:
There is a concerted effort to avoid people referring to it by its title, which lets you know off the top you are dealing with propaganda.
They hate that its actually called "The Final Solution" because the name itself begs the obvious question 'Solution to what?' and then you are down a path of critical thinking instead of being fed a narrative.

While it would be possible that the name was innocently changed, what lets me know that it was meticulously changed as part of a propaganda campaign is the term Anti-semetic itself. As a person that understands what the word semetic means, using the word Anti-semetic to mean anti-jewish is utter nonsense. The correct term when referring to someone being anti-jewish is.... wait for it... "ANTI-JEWISH". But they don't call it that because critical thinking again begs the question 'why is X anti-jewish or why is X being anti-jewish?'

That is not a train of thought they want you on.

These are not uneducated people using this term. These are scholars and professors.
Whenever educated men continuously use incorrect terms it is purposeful.
 

Black Nate Grey

The God Emperor of Mankind
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
7,343
Reputation
3,206
Daps
29,961
I do think it happened and it sounded horrible but not 6 million
Besides their people financed and continue to finance the oppression and suffering of my own people.
So forgive me (don't) for finding it difficult to separate my sympathy between a horrible event and an even worse 500 year running tragedy.
 

MajorVitaman

Superstar
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Messages
6,483
Reputation
3,180
Daps
34,913
Reppin
#ByrdGang (formerly Eastcoastnaga)
What trips me out is how much everyone makes Hitler seem like the ultimate evil


:stopitslime: no I'm not caping for Adolph, fukk Hitler


Yet Amerikkka teamed up with the equally, if not more genocidal USSR in WW2. So it wasn't about body counts.
:patrice:

And then you find out Amerikkkan companies and industrialists directly building the Nazi war machine.



Share a coke with Nazi's brehs :skip:

Then of course you have the Notorious Bush family KKKlan with Great Grand Pa Prescott Bush with some skull & bones 322 fukkery

Bush bank tied to Nazi funding

President Bush’s grandfather was a director of a bank seized by the federal government because of its ties to a German industrialist who helped bankroll Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, government documents show.

Prescott Bush was one of seven directors of Union Banking Corp., a New York investment bank owned by a bank controlled by the Thyssen family, according to recently declassified National Archives documents reviewed by the Associated Press.

Fritz Thyssen was an early financial supporter of Hitler, whose National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) Mr. Thyssen believed was preferable to communism. The documents do not show any evidence that Mr. Bush directly aided that effort. His position with Union Banking never was a political issue for Prescott Bush, who was elected to the Senate from Connecticut in 1952.

Reports of Prescott Bush’s involvement with the seized bank have been circulating on the Internet for years and have been reported by some mainstream news media. The newly declassified documents provide additional details about the Union Banking-Thyssen connection.

Trent Duffy, a spokesman for President Bush, declined to comment.


Union Banking was owned by a Dutch bank, Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaardt N.V., which was “closely affiliated” with the German conglomerate United Steel Works, according to an Oct. 5, 1942, report from the federal Office of Alien Property Custodian. The Dutch bank and the steel firm were part of the business and financial empire of Mr. Thyssen and his brother, Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, the report said.

Union Banking was seized by the government in October 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act.


The entire history of WW2 is hidden. Just like most cac history we'll probably never know the full truth while they laugh to the bank smh.
 

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,878
Reputation
8,770
Daps
96,449
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
Damn near 4-5 big budget Holocaust/WW2 movies a year, whether people deny it or not is inconsequential when you have control over media outlets to tell your version of history
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,024
Reputation
4,104
Daps
54,698
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
Im a jew and I will say it did happen but I don't believe the total number killed. Plus, it was kind of like a 9/11 for Jews so they could set up the state of Israel. Jews and Zionist are different and I dont fukk with Zionist, when people talk shyt bout jews running the world it's really the zionisit. History shows bankers always back both sides of a fight so they will always win. Hitler situation is no different.

Props, but what is the rationale for questionning the numbers? Genuinly curious as to why people put in doubt the 6 million figure

As a person that likes to be thorough and accurate... I can tell you that the holocaust triggers all sorts of red flags off the bat.
First, its not even called holocaust. :dead:
There is a concerted effort to avoid people referring to it by its title, which lets you know off the top you are dealing with propaganda.
They hate that its actually called "The Final Solution" because the name itself begs the obvious question 'Solution to what?' and then you are down a path of critical thinking instead of being fed a narrative.

While it would be possible that the name was innocently changed, what lets me know that it was meticulously changed as part of a propaganda campaign is the term Anti-semetic itself. As a person that understands what the word semetic means, using the word Anti-semetic to mean anti-jewish is utter nonsense. The correct term when referring to someone being anti-jewish is.... wait for it... "ANTI-JEWISH". But they don't call it that because critical thinking again begs the question 'why is X anti-jewish or why is X being anti-jewish?'

That is not a train of thought they want you on.

These are not uneducated people using this term. These are scholars and professors.
Whenever educated men continuously use incorrect terms it is purposeful.

Everyone in Europe knows it was called "The Final Solution" to the "Jewish problem" by HItler, that's not a scoop. It's called "Holocaust" by Jews, which understandably have reasons not to use the Nazi terminology, and by most people because well no one wants to use Nazi terminlogy (unless it's to condemn it). I personnaly try to avoid using "Holocaust" because it kind of hides the fact that all victims were not Jews, even though they were the majority.

The whole use of "anti-semitic" as opposed to "anti-jewish" is also regularly brought up (especially by Arabs -obviously- and by Blacks), and I agree that's it an abuse of language. ANd even so, what most people NOW call "anti-semitic" (when they really mean "Anti-Jewish") is really more anti-Zionism. That's why some are trying to equate anti-Zionism with "anti-semitism" when somle Jews themselves are anti-Zionists.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
45,680
Reputation
4,578
Daps
100,537
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
What I find weird is that prI ordered to WW2 the Jews always stated 6 million Jews were killed at this place or that place. I think I read the total deaths were less than a million and the only reason Germany put them in camps was the false flags attacks etc in Germany.

United States did the same shyt to the Jap.
 
Top