"Is Pharrell A House ******?" - Pitch(cac)fork

Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
32,691
Reputation
2,928
Daps
71,404
Reppin
Yeah
New Blackness: Pharrell, Kanye and Jay-Z and the Spectre of White Aspiration
During an interview with Oprah last Spring, producer and rapper Pharrell Williams dubbed himself "New Black". In his words: "The New Black doesn't blame other races for our issues. The New Black dreams and realizes that it's not a pigmentation; it's a mentality. And it's either going to work for you, or it's going to work against you. And you've got to pick the side you're gonna be on." Pharrell’s remarks floated around ideas about being black—"our issues," our "pigmentation," our pesky way of "working against" ourselves. These ideas put the onus of racism on black people. While Pharrell likely believes he was imparting wisdom, rather than being condescending, his words still stunk of the familiar "pull up your pants" stench.

When entertainers open their mouths to talk about something other than themselves, there’s always tension. The tension is there when Kanye "rants"; it’s there when Azealia Banks talks about black feminism in one breath, and utters Bill Cosby rape apologia in another; it’s also there when the exceptional Pharrell veers into Ayn Randian bootstrapping territory. While he may have reached a higher plane of enlightenment via New Black re-invention, for many black people it’s more complicated, and hitting refresh on their blackness does not change anything.

In Jay-Z’s Decoded, a memoir that doubles as a lyric book, Jay-Z seems to rebuke Pharrell’s philosophy, saying:

It’s crazy when people think that just because you have some money and white people start to like you that you transcend race. People try this shyt all the time with successful black people, even with someone like me who was plenty black when I was on the corner. It’s like they’re trying to separate you from the pack—make you feel like you’re the good one. It’s the old house ******-field ****** tactic.

Is Pharrell a house ******? Is Pharrell’s identification as "New Black" a demarcation, separating himself from Old Black millions—"the pack" as Jay-Z says—who don’t have the luxury of money and fame to act brand new? The house ******/field ****** dichotomy, Pharrell’s complexion aside, works because it sounds like Pharrell is happy as hell at other black people’s expense; happy to be up there with Oprah and others, not toiling the proverbial fields. But Pharrell’s happiness and self-proclaimed new black status seems like more of a positive coping strategy than stepping stone to real enlightenment. As we learned from his "Blurred Lines" deposition last year, giving unearned authorial credit to white artists on songs he’s written is status quo; he is not immune from structural racism and white supremacy. Pharrell’s own definition of new black isn’t comprehensive, nor are other people’s definitions, but what seems to be the case is that "new black" means rose-tinted shades worn inside one’s heart; Pharrell’s not unaware of sour problems—he simply chooses to ignore identity politics as it relates to his own (black) identity, a sort of reversing of the "personal is political."

Steeped in the principles, not the accoutrements of power and success, new blackness sees itself as a psychic departure from (old) blackness with the undersurface argument being that victimhood and survival are two sides of the same coin but one of the sides, victimhood, is embossed with an old white man’s face. New blackness seeks to replace the old white man’s face with the black faces of black entertainers who have magically transcended their blackness through the act of becoming richer than many rich white people. These black entertainers— Oprah Winfrey, Will Smith, Jay-Z and Beyoncé—are limited. Their positions at the top are rooted both in respect and "respectability politics"—(white people like them, black people LOVE THEM). There’s a blankness, a neutrality, they have attained that is parcel to their success. They can’t be stereotyped or thrown into the same turgid categories as other black entertainers (save for Bey’s Grammy nom) because their reputations as morally upright and hardworking precedes them before anything else.

It goes without saying, but not every black person is aspirational in the "new black" sense. Some black people, like Pharrell, are trying to get there, which is why he’s throwing the term around to begin with. By using the term "new black" in an interview with Oprah, Pharrell articulated his desire to elevate himself—through his word and deeds—to the "talented tenth."This elevation is feigned, a mentality more than a reality, but it’s nevertheless an important act of black representation within the black public space.

Oprah’s interviews have always existed as black public spaces for rappers to identify, legitimize and publicize themselves. Writer Gwendolyn D. Pough considers this a negotiation of black public culture within hip-hop:

Bringing the wreck, for Black participants in the public sphere historically has meant reshaping the public gaze in such a way as to be recognized as human beings—as functioning and worthwhile members of society—and not to be shut out of and pushed away from the public sphere.
Like a true vestige of the '90s, Oprah’s platform has functioned like scrambled porn: novels by black authors, interviews with Jay-Z, 50 Cent, Pharrell and more paint a static-y, encrypted image of A New Black America as a possible world; a world of transcendence and exceptionalism. But this sort of dialogue couldn’t be had with anyone other than Oprah. With good reason, Pharrell initially told his new black ideas to Oprah, the same way Raven-Symoné did later. This is because Oprah is to the entertainment world what the diamond is to the diamond industry: an ideological tool. But more than an ideological tool—selling brands, lifestyles, products and people—Oprah, as a status symbol, is a trusted depositary.

In Jay-Z’s Decoded, he recounts his days at Marcy Homes, a New York City project housing complex. Exploring the relationship between poverty and public displays of affluence, Jay-Z writes:

As kids we didn’t complain about being poor; we talked about how rich we were going to be and made moves to get the lifestyle we aspired to by any means we could. And as soon as we had a little money, we were eager to show it. I remember coming home from doing work out of state with my boys in a caravan of Lexuses that we parked right in the middle of Marcy. I ran up to my mom’s apartment to get something and looked out the window and saw those three new Lexuses gleaming in the sun, and thought, "man, we doin’ it." In retrospect, yeah that was ignorant, but at the time I could just feel that stink and shame of being broke lifting off of me, and it felt beautiful. The sad shyt is that you never really shake it all the way off, no matter how much money you get.
Rappers rap about their money for the same reasons cultural critics write about rappers rapping about their money: they are driven to assert themselves. Assertion is what all writers, including rappers, do. The difference between hip-hop and other forms, though, is that hip-hop uniquely exists at the intersection of ambition and insecurity.


Hip-hop assertion, as an authentic and authoritative act, often hinges on braggadocio and blackismo. Most rappers are rapping and speaking from the position of where they’re from and where they started (from the bottom). And even when they reach the pinnacle, their perspectives don’t seem to shift that much. In fact, the brags become more deeply entrenched in their past experiences. This lack of a shift opens up the space for assertion fueled by a noxious mix of insecurity and ambition. This is where most of the "new black" discourse permeates.

Status anxiety, as coined by Alain de Botton, is defined as "an almost universal anxiety... about what others think of us; about whether we’re judged a success or a failure, a winner or a loser." It’s clear, based on the interactions that have happened between rappers and rapper-adjacent figures in 2014, that some rappers are experiencing status anxiety now more than ever. This anxiety plays out on black public spaces like hip-hop radio stations and Twitter, as well as outside of those spaces. When Kanye compares himself to Steve Jobs, Walt Disney and other white men—as if Kanye as Kanyeisn’t enough—it’s an insecurity that rests on this notion that breaking whatever glass ceiling there is for black men, placing oneself at the top of the game, doesn’t cut it. It’s understandable, considering the fact that not many rappers are comfortable being #2, but except for the Michael Jordan comparison every now and then, Kanye rarely says he’s the [insert black person] of said genre. Why? Because that would be redundant, yes, but also: he’s trying to live up to a standard that says white is right. A standard quite different from Pharrell’s, which leans more on black status.

Black status anxiety looks no different on Kanye than it does on Childish Gambino. In a Breakfast Club interview, Childish Gambino elaborated on his tweets about the "bigness" and "whiteness" that he wants for himself, for his career, saying, "It was a poem about freedom…I do wanna be big and white. Like, Will Smith is big and white." Childish Gambino is almost saying what Pharrell is saying, except he’s not couching it in any kind of a mentality. He’s saying what Kanye is saying without making it explicitly about white people, even though it is when whiteness is the default and standard. Charlamagne the God pushes back in the conversation, asking Childish Gambino why he doesn’t simply say "human," but their opinions aren’t too far off when the issue harkens back to emulating and acquiring wealth, success and fame in the white power structure.

The tiny differences between Childish Gambino, Charlamagne, Pharrell and others are just that—tiny. They hinge on outmoded capitalistic ideas that uphold whiteness as aspirational. The blackness-affirming pushback from other artists like Azealia Banks and J. Cole is essential in 2015; while the dream of New Blackness—a life where we float free from everyday American racism, wholecloth spiritual re-invention—is a fun dream to entertain, it’s a dream that comes at the expense of Regular Old Blackness.
http://m.pitchfork.com/thepitch/631...nd-jay-z-and-the-spectre-of-white-aspiration/


:patrice:
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
40,490
Reputation
3,798
Daps
110,843
Good read but :yeshrug: at the end of the day. More money one makes, the more they're detached from the common man.
 

SunZoo

The Legendary Super Sapien.
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
36,732
Reputation
14,041
Daps
141,569
Reppin
T.L.C.
Dope read.

Though I don't like the term itself, I take "new black" as a concept as in a new perspective on blackness in the context of the country we are born in. I don't think the intention is in any way to separate from "black" culture as a whole, but from the default self image doled out by the system of white supremacy that says victim-hood is our legacy. We don't really have much else as a history HERE. Sure we can try and reach back, or reach out to other black cultures from outside the country to gain a sense of pride and enrichment, but it seems to remain at a surface level...shyt I've seen people get mad on here for "blacks" of other nationalities not wanting to tether themselves to our identity.

You won't find "yellow" or "brown" on government forms because there is no need for the rest of the color spectrum when you have the high (white) and the low (black)...everybody else in between can have their own identities and nationalities because they exist in a space where they aren't as good as white or as bad as black.

So when I see people trying to make that shift in perspective...to recondition how they see, think and feel about being black in america I see it as a necessary process. In fact I think it's necessary. If you scale the issue down to a personal level it's akin the spiritual concept of ego-death. That point in time where you were told that you have to be by your family, your society and your upbringing becomes ill-fit. It can be a very painful process because if you aren't who "you"...who are you? What comes next after you strip away feelings of victim hood and shame? That kind of freedom (much like when the slaves were freed) can be scary and confusing to navigate. You cling to what you know out of security because it's all you've been given but as you expand your awareness (something that can be a byproduct of acquiring a degree of wealth) you begin to notice just how heavy some of this shyt is.

I think the added element of that wealth can make it seem like you have to be in that "talented tenth" to come to a place where you aren't defined first by "black" and all that it comes attached to in the context of america. So when you hear them say it, it looks like some neener neener neener type shyt when I don't think that's the intention. I don't think you have to be the black version of ____ or reach a certain social/financial status...you don't have to want to be white at all to come to place where you want to define yourself, for yourself. And I think that's a hard thing to put into words given complexity of the situation.
 
Top