Is Quantum Physics bullshat?

[badhat]

I'm confused, you want a credible source of a group of people not claiming something?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

short cliff-notes of what Quantum Physics attempts to demonstrate and prove.

there is at the very basics of all matter atoms right? well Quantum deals with the inner-dimensions and workings of the atom itself. usually being broken down into what is known as strings of little wiggly energy. to resurface back to the easily-understandable, quantum also carries with it the implication that these strings actually have some form of sentience (in official papers, they NEVER out right say this). the observation of something changes it's very fundamentals and nature.

now I can get to posting links to videos and research papers, but it's not needed. you either believe this or don't, if you don't then it's no shame because shyt truly is on some mind blowing science-fiction shyt lol.

1. There is no evidence for string theory. Its all theory.
2. There is no connection of sentience:

"[Sire,] je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là."
"I did not need to make such an assumption."

- Laplace

 

[tmonster]

I'm confused, you want a credible source of a group of people not claiming something?

no you do, remember this?

Oh, and just so we're clear, nobody anywhere that's been near a Stern-Gerlach thinks that quantum mechanics is a sign that particles have sentience.

edit:
ooops
I just realized you were making a statement and not asking a question
my apologies

 

[MewTwo]

bump

 

[OneManGang]

Double Slit experiment
Unifying theory

 

[physics1]

Don't question Quantum Physics brehs.

 

[tmonster]

why is this thread 1 star?

 

[Serious]

Here we go again @Juneya

 

[tmonster]

Here we go again @Juneya

breh dropping science

 

[Broke Wave]

why is this thread 1 star?

Shut up cac


@Serious u a doctor yet?


Black science nikkas

I failed science every year in HS except one

I'm wilfully ignorant about shyt like this

 

[EndDomination]

short cliff-notes of what Quantum Physics attempts to demonstrate and prove.

there is at the very basics of all matter atoms right? well Quantum deals with the inner-dimensions and workings of the atom itself. usually being broken down into what is known as strings of little wiggly energy. to resurface back to the easily-understandable, quantum also carries with it the implication that these strings actually have some form of sentience (in official papers, they NEVER out right say this). the observation of something changes it's very fundamentals and nature.

now I can get to posting links to videos and research papers, but it's not needed. you either believe this or don't, if you don't then it's no shame because shyt truly is on some mind blowing science-fiction shyt lol.

Its not sentience that causes observation to influence the results.
Think about it like this (bad analogy), you want to know the exact position of ants under a rock.
You can't view the ants, without moving the rock and disturbing their position.
You make hypotheses based on factors that you can determine without disturbing the rock, and then you attempt to observe the ants underneath by moving the rock as slightly as possible.
It still disturbs the results, but you try your best to reconcile.
Also string theory may describe a lot of possible/theoretical universes.
Ergo, its a massive concept, to reconcile quantum mechanics with general relativity.

 

[Claudex]

didnt read all that. but he got the theory on quantum physics wrong.

its something along the lines of

when you dont observe atoms, they exist as waves
when you DO observe atoms, they become particles

also the universe is a field of consciousness and stuff.

the author just seems to be like i dont understand, therefore it cannot be.

I'd get into it but I refuse to read that brick.

That's really unfair to the author breh

He not acknowledged what you said but also explained clearly that maybe the answer isn't our "power of observation" but rather the fact that we don't have the knowledge to understand the probability of these atoms becoming particles again within the wave (aka the collapsing wave). He even suggested that the particle detector interferes with the atom resulting in the collapsing wave.

 

[Serious]

Shut up cac


@Serious u a doctor yet?


Black science nikkas

I failed science every year in HS except one

I'm wilfully ignorant about shyt like this

Nah doing post bac to get my grades up...

 

[Broke Wave]

Nah doing post bac to get my grades up...

Thats wassup bro, minor stepping stone to a life time of black excellence

 

[Serious]

Do not get me started on this fool

what about Neil