Is the idea of Kobe as a chucker, a myth?

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
32,509
Reputation
9,909
Daps
108,709
Reppin
Brooklyn
True shooting percentage accounts for free throws and big men are always poor foul shooters. Duncan shot his at 69.6% while Kobe shot his at 83.7%. From the field, you’re looking for effective field goal. Duncan was at .507 while Kobe was at .482. Yes Kobe was a chucker.
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
40,087
Reputation
5,332
Daps
112,959
Reppin
Rotten Apple
This is why people hate these analytic nerd ass geek clowns...

You have to watch the games and not just go off stats.

I watched Kobe’s entire career like I watched Tim Duncan’s

Kobe was a fukkin nut the likes of which few have ever been... Tim Duncan was never a nut like Kobe...

fukk outta here with this @Sccit dumb ass Kobe nut hugging propaganda:russ:

Kobe was a nut!
 

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,942
Reputation
10,696
Daps
153,541
Reppin
DFW
this is a classic example of what is wrong with analytics because the person who came up with this has NO FUICKING CLUE what true shooting is and how it's calculated...they just saw that Kobe's and Duncan's true shooting percentage and hit send...
 

killacal

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
30,869
Reputation
9,098
Daps
178,840
this is a classic example of what is wrong with analytics because the person who came up with this has NO FUICKING CLUE what true shooting is and how it's calculated...they just saw that Kobe's and Duncan's true shooting percentage and hit send...
But duncan played the right way right?:skip:

And he played the mid block:jbhmm:

And he didn't take on double and triple teams:patrice:

So why are their fg percentages so close:sas1:
 
Top