Is the Native American Struggle = or > than the African American Struggle?

N711oir

All Star
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
8,093
Reputation
-530
Daps
4,688
Not even a question. A lot of cacs claim to be native American that should answer your question right there:mjlol:. But when they ( those ex cons affectionally called pilgrims ) bum rushed this land/ if it was that many native Americans why go back to another continent and get slaves? And then bring them back here when you already had native Americans here:yeshrug: O that's right conveniently disease wiped them nearly to extinction. But Europe had the Black Plague and them mutha fukkas is still around here:francis: plus the original description of the Indian was copper tone / what you have now is a mixture of the original black people who resided here and the cohabiting with the cacs and there you have your modern day Native American a lot of those wars you read about french Indian war etc. where with the moors.
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,807
Not even a question. A lot of cacs claim to be native American that should answer your question right there:mjlol:. But when they ( those ex cons affectionally called pilgrims ) bum rushed this land/ if it was that many native Americans why go back to another continent and get slaves? And then bring them back here when you already had native Americans here:yeshrug: O that's right conveniently disease wiped them nearly to extinction. But Europe had the Black Plague and them mutha fukkas is still around here:francis: plus the original description of the Indian was copper tone / what you have now is a mixture of the original black people who resided here and the cohabiting with the cacs and there you have your modern day Native American a lot of those wars you read about french Indian war etc. where with the moors.
:dahell:
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
72,933
Reputation
18,210
Daps
310,654
:usure:

There are a lot of mixed-race Native Americans. But idk about that.

Fun fact: Native Americans were enslaved too, and were a majority of slaves in the Americas for a while. Gradually African slaves started to replace them in the late 17th and early 18th century.As they were being replaced, both Indian slaves and servants often married and had children with African slaves.

All the ancient Native Americans they talk about in history were ALL Black. Mayans, Aztecs, Olmecs, Washytaw, Seminoles, Cree, etc
Black Native Americans were on Colombus ships, directing him where to go . Columbus also wrote on how he saw wolly haired people when he went on shore
The "Modern" looking Natv Am came much later through the Bering Straight, from Asia. They were really small in number anyway. Those were the Navajo, Iroquios, etc. White man did a number on our history, make believe America wasn't ours, and that every black person in America were only here cause of slave ships. Then put out Pocahontas like it was all good :pachaha:
 

N711oir

All Star
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
8,093
Reputation
-530
Daps
4,688
You gotta question everything. The whole Indian name why called Indians :patrice:they'll say well he thought he was in India :martin: he had a map he knew where he was/ some say it was what started out as indigo meaning blue black/ as well think why if Columbus discovered did they name it America? Which they'll say after Amerigo vaspucci but that doesn't make sense you give a holiday to a common criminal but the man you name the continent after don't get a day:comeon: have to look up what America was called before they came over here/ research the olmecs amexem black people where already here we are what the cacs call native Americans/ it's why all grandparents would say they have Indian in there blood they weren't lying. As well have to understand the difference between Indeginous and native:dame:
 

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
51,252
Reputation
15,896
Daps
210,433
Reppin
....
Many were dark-complexioned depending on where they lived. Skin tone varied widely. No relation to Africa though.

squanto_1.jpg


th



th
So who told you this ... old westerns?

Did you do any research on it?


Read about the $5 Indians

Google Black Seminoles

Recheck my post

Notice that these are actual photos not paintings
th


1zoypap.jpg


th


pare-watene-2_22-card-4-pp.jpg
 

Dev2103

All Star
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
2,463
Reputation
130
Daps
3,588
tax exemptions, casino, contract set asides, reparations...i'll take it
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,377
Daps
152,950
Reppin
NULL
We're going to act like the Native Americans didn't participate in White Supremacy when they used to capture runaway slaves. :mjpls:
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,807
So who told you this ... old westerns?

Did you do any research on it?


Read about the $5 Indians

Google Black Seminoles

Recheck my post

Notice that these are actual photos not paintings
th


1zoypap.jpg


th


pare-watene-2_22-card-4-pp.jpg

Those aren't actual works of scholarship breh :francis:


Amerindian ancestry is from Asia-Siberia.

There are a lot of black Indians. But that's not because Indians were originally black. It's because African slaves and free persons interbred with Amerindians, both within white society and outside of it in maroon societies. Of course, this was all occurring before the invention of photography, so of course you're going to have pictures of black Indians that were a result of black-Amerindian unions later on.



There is, however, a lot of photography of Plains Indians (who managed to exist as distinct and independent tribal entities for a long time- until the invention of photography) out there. They aren't of African descent.
 
Last edited:

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,807
All the ancient Native Americans they talk about in history were ALL Black. Mayans, Aztecs, Olmecs, Washytaw, Seminoles, Cree, etc
Black Native Americans were on Colombus ships, directing him where to go . Columbus also wrote on how he saw wolly haired people when he went on shore
The "Modern" looking Natv Am came much later through the Bering Straight, from Asia. They were really small in number anyway. Those were the Navajo, Iroquios, etc. White man did a number on our history, make believe America wasn't ours, and that every black person in America were only here cause of slave ships. Then put out Pocahontas like it was all good :pachaha:

:snoop:

There is no actual verified evidence of any African-Amerindian contact before slave importation from West African kingdoms.
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,807
I shoulda known you were a CAC :mjlol:. I get it now


41K0S6ANYEL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg









Hey, look at this video. He's a Cac like you :gladbron:

Youtube videos do not equal verified evidence :snoop:

JET FUEL DOESNT MELT STEEL BEAMS!

Chance phenotypical similarities in material culture don't equate to actual habitation.

That book is a crock.

Still waiting on real scholarship.

That would actually really be interesting if true though :ehh:
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
72,933
Reputation
18,210
Daps
310,654
Youtube videos do not equal verified evidence :snoop:

JET FUEL DOESNT MELT STEEL BEAMS!

Chance phenotypical similarities don't equate to actual habitation.

That book is a crock.

Still waiting on real scholarship.

The Youtube video is showing people with scholarship who have actual archaeological. You replied to my post in a matter of seconds yet I bet you didn't even click the videos. CACs are furious :russ:

Wanna Google the Columbus passages of the types of people he saw when he went on the American and Caribbean coast? Be my guest:mjpls:



According to renowned American historian and linguist Leo Weiner of Harvard University, one of the strongest pieces of evidence to support the fact that Black people sailed to America before Christopher Columbus was a journal entry from Columbus himself. In Weiner’s book, “Africa and the Discovery of America,” he explains that Columbus noted in his journal that the Native Americans confirmed “black skinned people had come from the south-east in boats, trading in gold-tipped spears.”


:mjpls:
 

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
51,252
Reputation
15,896
Daps
210,433
Reppin
....
Those aren't actual works of scholarship breh :francis:


Amerindian ancestry is from Asia-Siberia.

There are a lot of black Indians. But that's not because Indians were originally black. It's because African slaves and free persons interbred with Amerindians, both within white society and outside of it in maroon societies. Of course, this was all occurring before the invention of photography, so of course you're going to have pictures of black Indians that were a result of black-Amerindian unions.
I don't agree.

The First Americans Were Africans: Documented Evidence
Dr. Imhotep is the first person to hold a Ph.D. with a specialization in ancient African history.

We Are Not JUST Africans :: The Black Native Americans
-> His Academia Profile - Clyde Winters | Uthman dan Fodio Institute - Academia.edu

They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America (Journal of African Civilizations)

Ivan Van Sertima, the Guyanese historian, linguist, and anthropologist

The people who wrote these books ( and more) went to universities and hold degrees

or does real scholarship = agreeing with white supremacy??
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,807
The Youtube video is showing people with scholarship who have actual archaeological. You replied to my post in a matter of seconds yet I bet you didn't even click the videos. CACs are furious :russ:

Wanna Google the Columbus passages of the types of people he saw when he went on the American and Caribbean coast? Be my guest:mjpls:






:mjpls:
Leo Weiner died in 1939. He was barely a professional historian. He wrote that book in 1922.


Hopefully I don't need to explain that there's been advances in scholarship since then. :mjlol:

Columbus said a lot of shyt to try to explain things he didn't understand. He also thought he was in the East Indies :francis:

Me not agreeing with pseudo-historical bullshyt has nothing to do with my race. It's just not true :yeshrug:

And it not being true takes nothing away from the incredible resilience and strength of African peoples in the New World :blessed:

But I realize I'm probably not going to get an intelligent conversation in TLR about something like this. Maybe I should check out Higher Learning :sas1:
 
Top