Is the WWE intentionally trying to sabotage Daniel Bryan

JoogJoint

In my own league.
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
14,359
Reputation
1,688
Daps
40,606
Reppin
Outer Space
they clearly arent trying to sabotage bryan.

they clearly did sabotage ryder and ziggler (and their recent booking of Henry has been odd).

Exactly.

They aren't trying to see this though.

They keep using words, "buried" and "sabotage." The only one that has been intentionally sabotage and buried with that shovel is Ziggler, Sandow, Ryder, and just about everybody else in that locker room.
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,237
Reputation
6,561
Daps
116,762
Reppin
Chile
Twerp? Not that far. They're using Brie in an annoying matter. That's the real issue amongst all this armchair booking.

The thing is...If not Kane, who? He's owned Blandy and beat Cripple and Batista. They could of done War Games but they don't like giving WCW credit

This is off topic but I still fail to realize why Sheamus was a worse option than Kane.

Both of them represent no real threat to the title, both of them have been lost in booking limbo for a while and are not seen as big deals. So if you gonna give one of them a 2 week build to challenge for the title, I say go for the guy who can AT LEAST contribute by having great matches.

The end result of the feud is gonna be the same (neither Bryan or Kane/Sheamus would gain anything from it) but you could've had a better story and way better matches :manny:

I don't buy the "Kane was the only option available" side.
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,237
Reputation
6,561
Daps
116,762
Reppin
Chile
Even if Daniel Bryan was booked well, people will still whine and complain. People should be happy dude is getting any shine at all.

He got the championship, what more do ya'll want?

People whine and complain about not getting a good storyline...he had a great build up before Wrestlemania.

People whine and complain about him not winning any matches...he still gets good clean wins against everybody.

People whine and complain about him not winning any championships...well dude had both championships at the moment.

Yeah he's in a corny storyline right now, but how many people backstage in the locker room you think would love to be stuck with this stupid storyline right now? Dude is LUCKY.

Exactly.

They aren't trying to see this though.

They keep using words, "buried" and "sabotage." The only one that has been intentionally sabotage and buried with that shovel is Ziggler, Sandow, Ryder, and just about everybody else in that locker room.

Who the hell is all these "people"? Where are "they" at?

I swear TSC tends to make up imaginary fans out of complaints from either die hard stans or dumb ass "smarks" from other forums :dead:
 

Osmosis

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
21,674
Reputation
3,621
Daps
58,827
They're obviously not trying to sabotage him. They're completely behind him now..

My thing is though the roster is stacked with talent but they run Bryan's first two title defenses against Kane of all people? The dude was jobbing in a wifebeater and dress pants less than one month ago. This isn't the days of the roster split where you can plug in Kane/Big Show/Henry into the title picture at any point. The belts are unified now.. The world title matches should never be filler now that they only have one world title. They should be running with Bryan/Cesaro or Bryan/Sheamus. Both guys aren't doing anything of note, are more over than Kane and have chemistry with Bryan. This Kane shyt just feels lazy.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
127,974
Reputation
9,328
Daps
151,691
Reppin
Westcoast
This is off topic but I still fail to realize why Sheamus was a worse option than Kane.

Both of them represent no real threat to the title, both of them have been lost in booking limbo for a while and are not seen as big deals. So if you gonna give one of them a 2 week build to challenge for the title, I say go for the guy who can AT LEAST contribute by having great matches.

The end result of the feud is gonna be the same (neither Bryan or Kane/Sheamus would gain anything from it) but you could've had a better story and way better matches :manny:

I don't buy the "Kane was the only option available" side.

Sheamus is very fukking boring though. Always has been. He's one of the worst sights of the last 3 years.

Sheamus more over than Kane? He's been getting booed out all year against real names. He's nothing.
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,237
Reputation
6,561
Daps
116,762
Reppin
Chile
Sheamus is very fukking boring though. Always has been. He's one of the worst sights of the last 3 years.

Whatever you may think of him - and I kinda agree with you, he's boring as fukk as a character (though I do think he's a good worker) - he's not a worse option than Kane in any way.
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,821
Reppin
Everywhere
They're obviously not trying to sabotage him. They're completely behind him now..

My thing is though the roster is stacked with talent but they run Bryan's first two title defenses against Kane of all people? The dude was jobbing in a wifebeater and dress pants less than one month ago. This isn't the days of the roster split where you can plug in Kane/Big Show/Henry into the title picture at any point. The belts are unified now.. The world title matches should never be filler now that they only have one world title. They should be running with Bryan/Cesaro or Bryan/Sheamus. Both guys aren't doing anything of note, are more over than Kane and have chemistry with Bryan. This Kane shyt just feels lazy.
Austin was feuding with Dude Love after he beat Michaels.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
127,974
Reputation
9,328
Daps
151,691
Reppin
Westcoast
Whatever you may think of him - and I kinda agree with you, he's boring as fukk as a character (though I do think he's a good worker) - he's not a worse option than Kane in any way.


He's definitely not more over....and if they played Kane up and brought up Hell No, it would of made sense. Fans were giving Kane huge heat coming out of EC.
 

DANJ!

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
8,626
Reputation
4,097
Daps
28,071
Reppin
Baltimore
They could've kept the Evolution shyt running for a lil' bit... since he showed all of them up at Mania, it'd only make sense they wanted to get back at him. But it can happen after the Kane thing is over too, so it ain't like it's definitely wrapped up.

The Kane shyt ain't terrible, it's just not a "big event"/"top heel in the E" feud... It's not a sabotage tho'. Sabotaging him to whom? The crowds still love him, he's headlining PPVs, he's still on "do no wrong" status on the net. In the eyes of everyone watching, DB is currently the #1 man... so what if he gets beat up on Raw? He could still have a Batista feud, or a Sheamus feud, and likely a Brock feud on the way. Who else you expect him to headline PPVs with?
 

ECA

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
8,545
Reputation
1,139
Daps
21,617
Reppin
NULL
:what: you barely see people making the claims you posted in TSC

:heh: I'm saying. This entire thread is basically saying D-Bry is being treated perfectly fine by the E. They find one upset D-Bry stan, and try to lump the rest of us with that person.

"B-bbbbbbbbbbbbbut, D-Bry stans are never happy" :mjlol: :camby:
 
Last edited:

Grifter

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,022
Reputation
16,619
Daps
259,150
Reppin
Watching
outside of building up someone, seems like everyone that people could agree to be in a title feud is busy for now. nikkas acting like "top" champs never had to deal with characters.
 
Top