HandyWithTheSteel
Superstar
Packed him up.
Is this the real reason why oldheads hate stats and analytics?
- Thread starter HandyWithTheSteel
- Start date
Packed him up.
Because it’s something they don’t know nor care to understand so they’d rather bytch about it instead.
Illuminatos
#OVOXO
More unskilled big men clanking contested mid-range jumpers, thank you.
All this dude's threads are about old heads.
He sucks so much young nikka díck, his face probably look like a glazed cinnamon roll
He sucks so much young nikka díck, his face probably look like a glazed cinnamon roll
Last edited:
HandyWithTheSteel
Superstar
This is what REAL BASKETBALL looks like.More unskilled big men clanking contested mid-range jumpers, thank you.
Trojan 24
Veteran
It is ironic that Dray's Daddy is actually the real PnR Merchant
This is what REAL BASKETBALL looks like.
Thank god modern players know how to post up players smaller than them
Still hard to believe Bron didn't at least average 20 that series.
Thank god modern players know how to post up players smaller than them
Even #1 Bron Stan Shannon Sharpe be like "I ain't got no excuse for that"
FunkDoc1112
Heavily Armed
What these guys are realizing is that nothing will ever be as special as when they were kids/teenagers and idolizing the players, and now they're lashing out lmao
There have always been 2 issues with analytics and the general public
1. People have a way of making an either/or scenario out of everything. It's not analytics OR scouting/the eye test. It's both. It's always been both. And when the analysis disagrees with conventional wisdom, rather than trying to find out why there's a disconnect, people assume the biases are on the analytics and not on the conventional thinking. Because of course people want stats to support their feelings, rather than seeing if their feelings are supported by measurables.
2. People tend to put belief in things they understand. But they also have no desire to understand anything new. With regard to basketball metrics, this basically means the only thing people recognize is points, rebounds and assists. Anything deeper than that and their brains turn into mush.
1. People have a way of making an either/or scenario out of everything. It's not analytics OR scouting/the eye test. It's both. It's always been both. And when the analysis disagrees with conventional wisdom, rather than trying to find out why there's a disconnect, people assume the biases are on the analytics and not on the conventional thinking. Because of course people want stats to support their feelings, rather than seeing if their feelings are supported by measurables.
2. People tend to put belief in things they understand. But they also have no desire to understand anything new. With regard to basketball metrics, this basically means the only thing people recognize is points, rebounds and assists. Anything deeper than that and their brains turn into mush.
This is what REAL BASKETBALL looks like.
Derozan would be the GOAT if he played in this garbage era
HandyWithTheSteel
Superstar
Thank god modern players know how to post up players smaller than them
What happened when Michael Jordan tried to post up the shortest player in NBA history?
Eddie Johnson played in the NBA, and Draymond literally has won 4 rings in this era. wtf does any of what you're saying have to do with the OP?
17ppg
Thank god modern players know how to post up players smaller than them
But, I'll give Bron a pass simply because he probably thought "I got 2 other stars on the team. I don't have to do as much"
He redeemed himself the next season, realizing he HAS to be the man, no matter how many star players are on the team