Is True Romance A Lost Art For Men?

Scott Larock

Its hard leaving thecoli but I gotta find a way...
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
8,678
Reputation
350
Daps
18,030
Reppin
Hell
smh @ this thread

Women can get sex anytime, how far do you think that romance angle will last? She's gonna get tired of you period, the real issue is america will never let women be in a position of weakness and untrust, that's gonna hurt the economy.

Women = money

Reality of the situation is the country would never let the cat out the bag, marriage was sensible back then becuase the system didn't have many winners, white men only could do the things many of us wanted, women weren't allowed the reach they had now, in order to survive marriage was the only real option for women.

These days it's not, women are free, women don't rush for dikk, it's freely avialible anytime.

Selling dreams to men to keep them spending. It's not that hard, get around a group of white men and watch the talk about marriage and women, alot of them aren't exactly what women would consider marriageable mates.

Romance has always been classified as simping, women really don't care for it, anything that has to do with men is easily attainable.
 

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,889
Reputation
8,800
Daps
96,497
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
It's not rocket science

Nah, but simplicity is rocket science to your species

tumblr_lul4qoiSE81r13ces.gif
 

Dirty_Jerz

Ethiop
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
12,602
Reputation
-820
Daps
11,380
Reppin
the evils of truth, and love
That's what I want. Romance. Love. One of them fairy tale style relationships.

THe older I get, I don't feel like chasing random tail at the bar...I just want that one honey I can call the one and say peace.

I feel like this generation only values sex and hooking up...and has killed romancce altogether. Now we're just looking at the dysfunctions it has caused where men are too aggressive, too focused on sex, women are too focused on getting in men's pocketsor too much on the defensive...and no one has any sense of morals or respect toward each other anymore as human beings. Point? We don't value each other anymore.

Look at previous generations...I think about how all the music in my Parent's time was all about relationships and love and now everything is about sex and f*cking and thots and this bullshyt? How are we even going to produc a cognizant generation to follow us if this is where we're at now.

Maybe human nature is just going against the whims of society and it perhaps was just unstoppable...I don't know. There are many other factors out there...but personally I feel like romance is just dead in general...and what people think it is has just been change due to how the world has changed in retrospect.



The upper margin of your post reminds me of a song with similar feelings in the lyrics, so I'm going to go ahead and post it for its relevancy and also for personal clarity.



Your mentioning of human nature vs society is a literary, point of interest. Is human nature merely the same as the majority of the "animal kingdoms" nature? Breeding as much as you are capable, or is human nature bound to create societal law?

Accumulative intelligence is something humans excell in, but where and how do we factor in emotions?
 
Last edited:

Dirty_Jerz

Ethiop
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
12,602
Reputation
-820
Daps
11,380
Reppin
the evils of truth, and love
smh @ this thread

Women can get sex anytime, how far do you think that romance angle will last? She's gonna get tired of you period, the real issue is america will never let women be in a position of weakness and untrust, that's gonna hurt the economy.

Women = money

Reality of the situation is the country would never let the cat out the bag, marriage was sensible back then becuase the system didn't have many winners, white men only could do the things many of us wanted, women weren't allowed the reach they had now, in order to survive marriage was the only real option for women.

These days it's not, women are free, women don't rush for dikk, it's freely avialible anytime.

Selling dreams to men to keep them spending. It's not that hard, get around a group of white men and watch the talk about marriage and women, alot of them aren't exactly what women would consider marriageable mates.

Romance has always been classified as simping, women really don't care for it, anything that has to do with men is easily attainable.





You say romance is only useful for women to survive from being weak, then give an example of this from the point of view of a woman trying to survive in colonial america.

Im going to go out on a limb here so to speak and say, romance and marriage didn't begin in america. Niether is marriage only a tool to "survive", my proof being that women and men need eachother to survive, literally. One more thing, simping is to be silly or foolish, two different concepts.
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,556
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,498
Reppin
NULL
romance is like a spice in your relationship. you need to sparkle it. if you pour the whole thing you'll ruin the meal.
 

Yesterday

Banned
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
1,847
Reputation
-2,146
Daps
6,183
Romance died when women started valuing men who don't need to be romantic to win their favor. Humans only do what they need to do to get what they want. When women started seeking men with narcissistic traits, it became the norm. Also romantic gestures are considered weak and thirsty.

Same thing with men. So many nekkas out here pumping up the heads of girls on instagram and FB, valuing their looks rather than what they bring to the table has encourage the younger generation of girls to stop being more than their appearance. I have yet to meet a girl under 27 who can cook or is naturally nurturing.
 
Top