1. It was the PM's spokesman and the interviewers tone suggests they made it up on the spot as a "whatever" type of thing but ok, again an acronym from 30 years ago doesn't confirm anything.
2. Those countries are thousands of miles away. Iran shares a border with both countries that IS occupies. Iran is on Assad's side, fighting alongside him, they are Shia, they fund Hezbollah who's fighting against ISIS, etc. Its completely logical to ask why IS hasn't attacked Iran in the same way they haven't attacked Israel.
ISIS is 600 miles from Israel's border. They don't have numbers in the GH. Take a look at this map and ask yourself how they're going to get fighters into Israel while Assad and other rebels control the entire region. That small grey box on the bottom left is the Golan Heights. Tell me how that makes any sense for them to allocate resources to that losing battle.. If they get their fighters in that region, they're going after Damascus, not Tel Aviv.
2a. Assad has very rarely been attacked by Israel. Israel has launched retalitory attacks in the GH after rockets were fired from Syria.
2b. No argument #bangbang
2c. You're wrong. There certainly is and has been a lot of terrorism and the Palestinians aren't as innocent as you and the Coli would like to portray them.
3. Yes, I know and it was a miracle once in a lifetime shot. Why would you take that risk when theres lower hanging fruit thats closer and easier to attain (Assad's land).