Escalation.what would you suggest?
the strongest message would be nuking but that's not an option for many reasons.
flood the area with 600,000 troops? and if so, for how long?
seriously, how would you handle it?
="Los Pollos Hermanos, post: 10413824, member: 18191is sick.]These nikkas are worse than the fukking Mexican cartel.
	The situation over there issad.
The media should discuss how the US is allies with Saudi Arabia though.
They're just as wild as ISIS. They behead people all the time.
Killing a man is one thing. Killing an idea or belief is a totally different ball game. Even if it were possible to wipe out Isis completely, what's gonna happen when US pulls out? Cause the american people have been fed up with their kids being killed in the middle east since '04. Boots on the ground is not gonna fly. Pulling out creates another power vacuum that will easily be filled by another extremist group. How do you fight a dragon that grows an extra head each time you chop one off?I didn't watch the video, but my views on these things are pretty disturbing.
If the United States really wants to take control of this situation, go full force and take care of the problem. None of this p*ssyfooting around. You want to send a message? Then send the strongest message you can...you've done it before in history.
The kind of level I'm talking about destroys any military level of involvement the U.S. has been involved in since World War II breh.Killing a man is one thing. Killing an idea or belief is a totally different ball game. Even if it were possible to wipe out Isis completely, what's gonna happen when US pulls out? Cause the american people have been fed up with their kids being killed in the middle east since '04. Boots on the ground is not gonna fly. Pulling out creates another power vacuum that will easily be filled by another extremist group. How do you fight a dragon that grows an extra head each time you chop one off?
Unless you're talking about nuking hundreds of thousands of innocent people, I'm lost.The kind of level I'm talking about destroys any military level of involvement the U.S. has been involved in since World War II breh.
The type of action I'm talking about is worldwide impact immediately. In large part the United States has been wasting their time out there since after 9/11. It's costs so much money and lives and has not accomplished much outside of killing a figurehead
You don't. It'll kill itself off IMO. If you're killing 1700 students, your advancement as a country will already take a blow. They're not doing anything but destroying themselves.Killing a man is one thing. Killing an idea or belief is a totally different ball game. Even if it were possible to wipe out Isis completely, what's gonna happen when US pulls out? Cause the american people have been fed up with their kids being killed in the middle east since '04. Boots on the ground is not gonna fly. Pulling out creates another power vacuum that will easily be filled by another extremist group. How do you fight a dragon that grows an extra head each time you chop one off?
I'm talking about escalation to the point in where the enemy fears that a nuclear response is imminent.Unless you're talking about nuking hundreds of thousands of innocent people, I'm lost.
Like I said, it doesn't matter how hard you hit them with your military. Military might can only destroy things in the physical. You can shoot or bomb things that don't exist in the physical form.
And that's my point. If we are going out there...then really do what it takes. If not? Get the fukk outYou don't. It'll kill itself off IMO. If you're killing 1700 students, your advancement as a country will already take a blow. They're not doing anything but destroying themselves.
I don't know why we entertain these fukks, keep home safe, that's all that matters.
We're not going out there to save them people bro, we're going out there for personal interest.And that's my point. If we are going out there...then really do what it takes. If not? Get the fukk out