Can you point to the part where it says the US is protecting ISIS fighters
ISIS now uses U.S. Air Force for it's protection
- Thread starter thekingsmen
- Start date
2012 U.S. knew AL-Q and Muslim Brotherhood were major force for the opposition.
There is no "moderate rebels". Cite Page 3 section B admits AQI was supporting the opposition the whole time.
Futuristic Eskimo
All Star
First al-Baghdadi doesnt even exist. Now Mccains posing for pictures with him.
I guess whatevers most convenient for your argument at the time
I guess whatevers most convenient for your argument at the time
First al-Baghdadi doesnt even exist. Now Mccains posing for pictures with him.
I guess whatevers most convenient for your argument at the time
Play dumb when proof is in your face.
Posing with a fictional character happens. People bring their kids to Disneyland to visit and meet characters who aren't real.
USSInsiders
Banned
First al-Baghdadi doesnt even exist. Now Mccains posing for pictures with him.
I guess whatevers most convenient for your argument at the time
Who ever said he didn't exist? People have only said his history is very sketchy and he may have been a Mossad agent. Anyone with a brain realizes this ISIS shyt is being backed by the West/Israel. Clear as day. We've funded insurgencies for decades not sure why this is some mindblowing conspiracy. Nobody is saying the moon is a reptilian moonbase, we're saying they're a proxy army used to do our dirty work, just like the Mujis did back in the 80s until we made them expendable 14 years ago.
Red Shield
Global Domination
If you haven't realized that ISIS is USA created, funded, and controlled by now.. then I don't know what to tell you 
I'm impressed that Assad has held on for as long as he has tho
I'm impressed that Assad has held on for as long as he has tho
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Make up stories on the Internet, Brehs.
Still no evidence.
Still no evidence.
As predicted those who see the evidence don't want to admit it. @Din0can & @BuddyOmar let's take them back to 2009 a document that admits their own tactics to get what they want. Which Path to Persia? written by the Brookings Institution
In the book is states:
US Sponsored Terrorism and Armed Insurrection
Arming, Funding, and Using Terrorist Organizations, page 113 (page 126 of the PDF): "The United States could work with groups like the Iraq-based National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and its military wing, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), helping the thousands of its members who, under Saddam Husayn’s regime, were armed and had conducted guerrilla and terrorist operations against the clerical regime. Although the NCRI is supposedly disarmed today, that could quickly be changed."
"Potential Ethnic Proxies," page 117-118 (page 130-131 of the PDF): "Perhaps the most prominent (and certainly the most controversial) opposition group that has attracted attention as a potential U.S. proxy is the NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), the political movement established by the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq). Critics believe the group to be undemocratic and unpopular, and indeed anti-American.
In contrast, the group’s champions contend that the movement’s long-standing opposition to the Iranian regime and record of successful attacks on and intelligence-gathering operations against the regime make it worthy of U.S. support. They also argue that the group is no longer anti-American and question the merit of earlier accusations. Raymond Tanter, one of the group’s supporters in the United States, contends that the MEK and the NCRI are allies for regime change in Tehran and also act as a useful proxy for gathering intelligence. The MEK’s greatest intelligence coup was the provision of intelligence in 2002 that led to the discovery of a secret site in Iran for enriching uranium.
Despite its defenders’ claims, the MEK remains on the U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations. In the 1970s, the group killed three U.S. officers and three civilian contractors in Iran. During the 1979-1980 hostage crisis, the group praised the decision to take America hostages and Elaine Sciolino reported that while group leaders publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks, within the group celebrations were widespread.
Undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks—often excused by the MEK’s advocates because they are directed against the Iranian government. For example, in 1981, the group bombed the headquarters of the Islamic Republic Party, which was then the clerical leadership’s main political organization, killing an estimated 70 senior officials. More recently, the group has claimed credit for over a dozen mortar attacks, assassinations, and other assaults on Iranian civilian and military targets between 1998 and 2001. At the very least, to work more closely with the group (at least in an overt manner), Washington would need to remove it from the list of foreign terrorist organizations."
Well well well just in time 2012 guess who is off the terrorist list....http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/22/w...wins-removal-from-us-terrorist-list.html?_r=0
In the book is states:
US Sponsored Terrorism and Armed Insurrection
Arming, Funding, and Using Terrorist Organizations, page 113 (page 126 of the PDF): "The United States could work with groups like the Iraq-based National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and its military wing, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), helping the thousands of its members who, under Saddam Husayn’s regime, were armed and had conducted guerrilla and terrorist operations against the clerical regime. Although the NCRI is supposedly disarmed today, that could quickly be changed."
"Potential Ethnic Proxies," page 117-118 (page 130-131 of the PDF): "Perhaps the most prominent (and certainly the most controversial) opposition group that has attracted attention as a potential U.S. proxy is the NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), the political movement established by the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq). Critics believe the group to be undemocratic and unpopular, and indeed anti-American.
In contrast, the group’s champions contend that the movement’s long-standing opposition to the Iranian regime and record of successful attacks on and intelligence-gathering operations against the regime make it worthy of U.S. support. They also argue that the group is no longer anti-American and question the merit of earlier accusations. Raymond Tanter, one of the group’s supporters in the United States, contends that the MEK and the NCRI are allies for regime change in Tehran and also act as a useful proxy for gathering intelligence. The MEK’s greatest intelligence coup was the provision of intelligence in 2002 that led to the discovery of a secret site in Iran for enriching uranium.
Despite its defenders’ claims, the MEK remains on the U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations. In the 1970s, the group killed three U.S. officers and three civilian contractors in Iran. During the 1979-1980 hostage crisis, the group praised the decision to take America hostages and Elaine Sciolino reported that while group leaders publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks, within the group celebrations were widespread.
Undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks—often excused by the MEK’s advocates because they are directed against the Iranian government. For example, in 1981, the group bombed the headquarters of the Islamic Republic Party, which was then the clerical leadership’s main political organization, killing an estimated 70 senior officials. More recently, the group has claimed credit for over a dozen mortar attacks, assassinations, and other assaults on Iranian civilian and military targets between 1998 and 2001. At the very least, to work more closely with the group (at least in an overt manner), Washington would need to remove it from the list of foreign terrorist organizations."
Well well well just in time 2012 guess who is off the terrorist list....http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/22/w...wins-removal-from-us-terrorist-list.html?_r=0
Make up stories on the Internet, Brehs.
Still no evidence.
Believe in Islamic boogeymen from caves trying to steal your freedom away, brehs.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Be unable to back up the positions you take and instead hurl baseless accusations at people who question you, Brehs.
Futuristic Eskimo
All Star
So Mccain is posing with a real Syrian rebel who doubles as an actor for the US under the fictional character Baghdadi?@BuddyOmar You caping for deranged nonsense like his explanation for this picture doesn't further your argument whatsoever.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
It was just 3 years ago that all those people in the Armed Forces took pictures or video with signs in front of their faces saying they didn't want to be auxiliary to these forces. I'm sure they are still out there. I never seen anything like that 
.
It was like when the Vietnam War was happening and former soldiers showed up in uniform protesting, except this case 3 years ago involved still enlisted people.
.It was like when the Vietnam War was happening and former soldiers showed up in uniform protesting, except this case 3 years ago involved still enlisted people.
Red Shield
Global Domination
People keep thinking conspiracy=orion dragon girls from xelc 9. They really need to bring it back down to earth and accept some harsh truths about our world.
But it's understandable why they don't. Not like we can stop the govt or powerful people
It's been proven already but keep trolling since you cant debunk these claims anyways, brehs.
@BuddyOmar You caping for deranged nonsense like his explanation for this picture doesn't further your argument whatsoever.
You clearly are retarded. "A real Syrian rebel"....can you even provide evidence he is Syrian?