Muhammad came along hundreds of years after the Revelation of The Apostle John. The Qur'an itself was completed hundreds of years after that. The Qur'an itself is a commentary on the Bible, and the actions of its adherents are a manifestation of that heretical and blasphemous commentary, by biblical definition.
Basically, going by the Bible literally without subjectively inserting personal beliefs, Muhammad couldn't have been who he says he is if he was using the Bible as a reference. Biblically speaking he set up a false religious system by adding and/or taking away from the words of Revelation, which not only would remove his name and the names of all who follow his heretical teachings out of the Book of Life of the Lamb referenced in said Revelation, but would mean the entire Islamic faith is an Antichrist system.
This is the reason why Islam is spread by the sword, because Muhammad made a major tactical error in using the bible to exalt himself. Anyone who was literate enough to read a bible and then kick it with Muhammad would know he was committing blasphemy and developing an antichrist belief system. He would've been better off acting like his whole doctrine was a fresh new start from ANYTHING REMOTELY semitic. That's why "unbelievers" have to be slaughtered, because anyone who can read with a reasonable lvl of intelligence can see that any version of Islam referencing the New Testament or any of its principal characters is a counterfeit religion.
