It Is Essential That A Man Has More Than 1 Woman...If U Can't Respect That Your Whole Perspective Is

[BaldingSoHard]

Depends on what you want.

If you want to be hypersexual and minimize risk (of heartbreak, not stds) then sure, having multiple chicks gives you leverage over other chicks because of supply / demand.

But if you want to build something with someone, that shyt is not the wave.

 

[Jatigi]

I seriously question some of y'all's reasoning skills. There are about as many women as there are men. So if all these women are sharing men, either men are sharing women or going without all together...it must, therefore, not be that essential to juggle multiple women if most men aren't doing that.

 

[Draje]

As long as you don't need to lie or get mad when a woman says she needs more than one dikk to stay sane

 

[Ronnie Macho]

You can get with this

or you can get with that

So what's it gon' be...half empty or half full...???...

 

[Ronnie Macho]

As long as you don't need to lie or get mad when a woman says she needs more than one dikk to stay sane

I don't get mad @hoes nor wife them......I just fukk 'em...

If you're talkin' in a "relationship"...just let it be known what'chu about and have the backbone and fortitude to handle your business on and off the street...as long as you're taking care of your ladies financially and emotionally as well as sexually...they won't care...this is what Nature really is...there's plenty of fine girls in polygamous relationships where they're loyal to the man they share...this is Natural...you see it in the animal kingdom and everywhere else in life...except for this upside down world we call america (i am race)...

Also a woman that needs more than 1 dikk to stay sane is called a nympho...not every girl gotta problem with sharin' and a lotta girls play their position as down ass bytches or ride or die chics...some girls just wanna be takin' care of and don't care what a nikka do as long as nothin' incurable comes back...

 

[Ronnie Macho]

I seriously question some of y'all's reasoning skills. There are about as many women as there are men. So if all these women are sharing men, either men are sharing women or going without all together...it must, therefore, not be that essential to juggle multiple women if most men aren't doing that.

Breh...u did a whole lotta juelzin' for that 1 female dap...

 

[7th Letter Specialist]

Breh...u did a whole lotta juelzin' for that 1 female dap...

I couldn't even understand that shyt tbh

 

[Shorty K]

Don't start shyt like this if you're going to be mad when women want more than 1 man.

Multiple men cannot co-exist with the same partner. Women have shared men since the beginning of time and continue to do so to this day. Their views on relationships are 100% based on what they've been taught by men, currently they're being taught not to share by men. Because if they were taught to be polygamous, they'd all just hook up with the top 10% of men and leave the rest of you nikkas fighting over the scraps

 

[Ronnie Macho]

I couldn't even understand that shyt tbh

For real my nikka speaking that rosetta stone white knight simp language...that shyt not gon' get u the drawls b... @Jatigi

 

[7th Letter Specialist]

For real my nikka speaking that rosetta stone white knight simp language...that shyt not gon' get u the drawls b... @Jatigi

nikka outchea like

 

[Ronnie Macho]

Multiple men cannot co-exist with the same partner. Women have shared men since the beginning of time and continue to do so to this day. Their views on relationships are 100% based on what they've been taught by men, currently they're being taught not to share by men. Because if they were taught to be polygamous, they'd all just hook up with the top 10% of men and leave the rest of you nikkas fighting over the scraps

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

Don't start shyt like this if you're going to be mad when women want more than 1 man.

They already do

 

[Ronnie Macho]

nikka outchea like

I gotta rep you for that shyt...brought out that ol' Dave Hollister...and fukk what'chu heard 'ol girl in the white pants would have had to get it...fukk that!!!...

Edit: Rep is down...but I got u...

 

[Brolic Scholar]

It depends on where you are in life and your priorities. I think women expect good looking and/or financially free men to have "options". I've had this conversation with several women. Women just don't want to be embarrassed.

I think if you're a family man (where I am currently) it's a disaster waiting to happen. I've seen it go down. A man with everything losing it all. It's ugly.

But if you're young, do your thing. Women want a desired man.

 

[Draje]

I don't get mad @hoes nor wife them......I just fukk 'em...

If you're talkin' in a "relationship"...just let it be known what'chu about and have the backbone and fortitude to handle your business on and off the street...as long as you're taking care of your ladies financially and emotionally as well as sexually...they won't care...this is what Nature really is...there's plenty of fine girls in polygamous relationships where they're loyal to the man they share...this is Natural...you see it in the animal kingdom and everywhere else in life...except for this upside down world we call america (i am race)...

Also a woman that needs more than 1 dikk to stay sane is called a nympho...not every girl gotta problem with sharin' and a lotta girls play their position as down ass bytches or ride or die chics...some girls just wanna be takin' care of and don't care what a nikka do as long as nothin' incurable comes back...

She's called a nympho because women sexually is constantly held in check due to what men think, not what women want.

If your woman was taking care of all her wifely duties and was a supportive/great partner, you'd be ok with her needing some side dikk to stretch out her walls to stay sane? Or are the rules different? Why should your sexual needs supersedes the woman you're in a relationship with?

You know nature also states that women should fukk the most physically or highest status men while finding another male to raise the b*stard children, lying to them? You tell women to do that because it's so popular in nature? Infantcide happens all the time in nature, you promoting that too? Or yo gonna pick and choose what in nature is a good justification?