It's always funny when "fans" make contradictory and hypocritical arguments
- Thread starter Goatpoacher
- Start date
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Read your own thread title dip shyt. You're talking about "fans". Which fans say other greats past and present couldn't win with an stacked team? None do because only Kobe is held to that standard.
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
The problem is you Kobestans like comparing Kobe to other players based on TEAM success and you try to argue that quality of teammates is irrelevant to the discussion.
Any of you Kobestans who use the rings argument and don't think Wade was a better player than Kobe in 2006...
Your dumbass needs to read the thread title too. Its about contradictory and hypocritical arguments. You're crying about one small discussion. And even then, all the greats are measured by their ring count because they all had great teams. Or are you going to tell me that Kobe had stacked title teams andShaq didn't?
Lakerman0834
Veteran
lol @ a 17 yr vet 34 year old guy getting this dudes this heated 
theoretic
All Star
Shaq was dominant. Hakeem was dominant. Wilt was dominant. Barkley was dominant. Tim Duncan is dominant.
Pau Gasol was a very good player.
Shaq was dominant. Hakeem was dominant. Wilt was dominant. Barkley was dominant. Tim Duncan is dominant.
Pau Gasol was a very good player.
Lol @ Pau being dominant. The same people saying Pau is dominat are the same ones saying Pau was soft and overrated prior to 2008.
The problem is people draw their conclusion first, usually based of emotion or limited knowledge/understanding, and then use what ever metric they can find to support it rather than being thorough and basing their conclusion off of what has actually happened. Very often they are forced to change course when circumstances change.
Yeah they are. They are the same nikkas who wanted to talk about rings when Kobe was winning them.
The same nikkas giving Kobe ALL the credit for 08-10 are the same nikkas blaming everybody but Kobe in the years immediately before and after. All I ask for is consistency. If you wanna give Kobe all the credit for 5 rings and totally ignore circumstances that contributed to them that's cool as long as you ignore circumstances when his squad cops L's to give him blame as well. Anything else and you are being inconsistent. You can't attack inconsistency when you are being inconsistent yourself.
Yeah they are. They are the same nikkas who wanted to talk about rings when Kobe was winning them.
The same nikkas giving Kobe ALL the credit for 08-10 are the same nikkas blaming everybody but Kobe in the years immediately before and after. All I ask for is consistency. If you wanna give Kobe all the credit for 5 rings and totally ignore circumstances that contributed to them that's cool as long as you ignore circumstances when his squad cops L's to give him blame as well. Anything else and you are being inconsistent. You can't attack inconsistency when you are being inconsistent yourself.he should have been considered dominant considering how weak the bigs were in the NBA when they went back to back.
Shaq was dominant. Hakeem was dominant. Wilt was dominant. Barkley was dominant. Tim Duncan is dominant.
Pau Gasol was a very good player.
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
So you expect the Lakers to win the title this year right? Its Paus team now and there is no "chucker" to "kill team chemistry". So that's your pick right? Because Pau is so dominant.
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
consistency. Let's see if you have it. Kobe won titles on stacked teams. Shaq won titles on stacked teams. Do you agree?The problem is people draw their conclusion first, usually based of emotion or limited knowledge/understanding, and then use what ever metric they can find to support it rather than being thorough and basing their conclusion off of what has actually happened. Very often they are forced to change course when circumstances change.
Yeah they are. They are the same nikkas who wanted to talk about rings when Kobe was winning them.
theoretic
All Star
You guys don't know basketball. LOL @ comparing Pau now to how he was playing in 2008-2009...NOBODY is calling him dominant today.So you expect the Lakers to win the title this year right? Its Paus team now and there is no "chucker" to "kill team chemistry". So that's your pick right? Because Pau is so dominant.
Go on with your back and forth about nothing tho
To be dominate you need to dominate you need people to fear you. Nobody has ever feared playig Pau Gasol. Marc Gasol is more dominate than Pau
I don't agree that you have to be feared to be considered dominant.
Marc Gasol definitely has more impact than Pau in 2013