For years, my hierarchy has worked like this when it comes to chicks:
1. Face
2. Waist
3. Ass (in that order) and it works like this:
I love a girl with a beautiful face. It's top priority for me.
However, I can make a slight exception on the face if she has a really nice waist and an ass that's serviceable. I love stomachs almost as much as I love gorgeous faces.
IF the face and waist are lacking, she has to make up for it with a GREAT ass to to get my attention.
So I can settle with a girl that totally lacks an ass...
...BUT her face has to be ridiculously gorgeous and her waist has to be on-point...
...however if her face ISN'T on point but I can be sold on her waist and ass then I'll play ball.
The lower she scores on something that's "high priority"...the higher she has to score to make up for it in the other two categories.
The higher she ranks on a higher priority, the more wiggle room she has for the others.
It's priorities, nikka.
How would you rank your top 3 features when it comes to physical attraction?
1. Face
2. Waist
3. Ass (in that order) and it works like this:
I love a girl with a beautiful face. It's top priority for me.

However, I can make a slight exception on the face if she has a really nice waist and an ass that's serviceable. I love stomachs almost as much as I love gorgeous faces.

IF the face and waist are lacking, she has to make up for it with a GREAT ass to to get my attention.

So I can settle with a girl that totally lacks an ass...
...BUT her face has to be ridiculously gorgeous and her waist has to be on-point...

...however if her face ISN'T on point but I can be sold on her waist and ass then I'll play ball.

The lower she scores on something that's "high priority"...the higher she has to score to make up for it in the other two categories.
The higher she ranks on a higher priority, the more wiggle room she has for the others.
It's priorities, nikka.

How would you rank your top 3 features when it comes to physical attraction?