AND IF KINCAID CAUGHT
THAT EASY PASS
YOU WOULDN'T BE SAYING
ANY OF THIS
I've never heard this much "referee/cheating" talk regarding the NFL (Chiefs)
- Thread starter jadillac
- Start date
AND IF KINCAID CAUGHT
THAT EASY PASS
YOU WOULDN'T BE SAYING
ANY OF THIS
threattonature
Veteran
You can have a one handed catch. The second hand doesn't have to be on the ball. As long as the ball doesn't move at all after it touches the ground. The ball was secure against the defender's arm which counts. Again both players can say they had the ball secure in which case the tie goes to the offensive player.
WHEN THEY HIT
THE GROUND WORTHY
STILL HAD ONE HAND
ON THE BALL,
THEN GRABBED IT WITH
HIS OTHER HAND.
INT IS SUPPOSED TO BE
DOWN BY CONTACT AS
SOON AS THEY TOUCH THE GROUND
NOT AFTER WORTHY GETS
HIS SECOND ARM AROUND THE BALL
WORTHY NEVER CAUGHT
NOR HAD CONTROL
OF THE BALL HE WAS SIMPLY
TRYING TO BREAK UP THE INT
WHEN THEY HIT
THE GROUND WORTHY
STILL HAD ONE HAND
ON THE BALL,
THEN GRABBED IT WITH
HIS OTHER HAND.
INT IS SUPPOSED TO BE
DOWN BY CONTACT AS
SOON AS THEY TOUCH THE GROUND
NOT AFTER WORTHY GETS
HIS SECOND ARM AROUND THE BALL
WORTHY NEVER CAUGHT
NOR HAD CONTROL
OF THE BALL HE WAS SIMPLY
TRYING TO BREAK UP THE INT
Where in the rule book does it state you need two hands to possess the ball? One is enough.
Let's use your logic and call down by contact:
Worthy and the defender both have the ball. Worthy's elbow is down so if that's down by contact with them both in possession then the tie goes to the offense.
This is a better shot at completing the catch because they're going to the ground so it's who comes away with it:
Again, a tie goes to the offense. Had the defender pulled it way here then you'd have a point but he didn't. That's simultaneous possession which is a catch for the offense.
Where in the rule book does it state you need two hands to possess the ball? One is enough.
Let's use your logic and call down by contact:
Worthy and the defender both have the ball. Worthy's elbow is down so if that's down by contact with them both in possession then the tie goes to the offense.
This is a better shot at completing the catch because they're going to the ground so it's who comes away with it:
Again, a tie goes to the offense. Had the defender pulled it way here then you'd have a point but he didn't.
HE DOESN'T HAVE A ONE HAND CATCH
HE SIMPLY HAS HIS ARM IN
BETWEEN THE DEFENDERS ARMS
TRYING TO YANK THE BALL OUT.
PUT IT LIKE THIS....
IF THE DEFENDER JUST SIMPLY
LET THE BALL GO,
THAT BALL WOULD HAVE GONE
CRASHING INTO THE TURF IMMEDIATELY
BECAUSE WORTHY HAD NO CONTROL
OF THE BALL HE WAS TRYING TO BREAK
UP THE PLAY.
HE DOESN'T HAVE A ONE HAND CATCH
HE SIMPLY HAS HIS ARM IN
BETWEEN THE DEFENDERS ARMS
TRYING TO YANK THE BALL OUT.
PUT IT LIKE THIS....
IF THE DEFENDER JUST SIMPLY
LET THE BALL GO,
THAT BALL WOULD HAVE GONE
CRASHING INTO THE TURF IMMEDIATELY
BECAUSE WORTHY HAD NO CONTROL
OF THE BALL HE WAS TRYING TO BREAK
UP THE PLAY.
Again, the catch isn't made in the air. They're hitting the ground so the catch is based on who has it when they land. They both have it.
If they both have it guess what, tie goes to the offense.
THEY BOTH DONT HAVE IT.
ONE GUY HAS IT
AND THE OTHER GUYS
HAND IS BETWEEN TRYING
TO BREAK UP THE CATCH
THE DB SIMPLY WOULDN'T LET
THE BALL GO
THEY BOTH DONT HAVE IT.
ONE GUY HAS IT
AND THE OTHER GUYS
HAND IS BETWEEN TRYING
TO BREAK UP THE CATCH
THE DB SIMPLY WOULDN'T LET
THE BALL GO
You keep acting like the DB had the ball while Worthy only had one hand on it so the defender had possession of the ball.
Bills defender had on two RED gloves so unless he has 3 hands he only had 1 on the ball when they land while Worthy had 2 on it:
You keep acting like the DB had the ball while Worthy only had one hand on it so the defender had possession of the ball.
Bills defender had on two RED gloves so unless he has 3 hands he only had 1 on the ball when they land while Worthy had 2 on it:
THIS IS OBVIOUSLY AFTER
THE BALL HIT THE GROUND
AND HE WRESTLED IT AWAY
1) NFL bigger than it’s ever been = more casuals.
More casuals = complete ignorance to rules ie that the ball can hit the ground as long as it doesn’t move that Worthy play WAS a catch. More casuals also = no sports ethics. No concept of manning up and being accountable, not crying, etc.
2) Betting
Your parlay runs for 39 yards and you had him at 40 then of course it’s a grand conspiracy.
Bottom line Buffalo had the ball with over a minute and just needed a fg. Mahomes got KC into fg range with 13 seconds left. So I’m not trying to hear that shyt. And the devil is in the details:
-Xavier worthy was a game changer and is only there bc you traded with KC.
-You chose to go cheap at WR.
-You chose to instead pay Dawson Knox 10 m/year…
-Then draft a TE in round 1, but also stunting said TE’s growth playing next to Knox. So he wasn’t ready to shine and make that catch
-You chose to go RB by committee. In the reg season that’s ok but in the AFCCG?! James cook only 13 carries….85/2td. Ty and Davis get 8 carries?! For 23 yards and on the final drive for all the marbles the first carry is to Ray Davis!
Anyone on some ‘da refs’ on this one is a casual
More casuals = complete ignorance to rules ie that the ball can hit the ground as long as it doesn’t move that Worthy play WAS a catch. More casuals also = no sports ethics. No concept of manning up and being accountable, not crying, etc.
2) Betting
Your parlay runs for 39 yards and you had him at 40 then of course it’s a grand conspiracy.
Bottom line Buffalo had the ball with over a minute and just needed a fg. Mahomes got KC into fg range with 13 seconds left. So I’m not trying to hear that shyt. And the devil is in the details:
-Xavier worthy was a game changer and is only there bc you traded with KC.
-You chose to go cheap at WR.
-You chose to instead pay Dawson Knox 10 m/year…
-Then draft a TE in round 1, but also stunting said TE’s growth playing next to Knox. So he wasn’t ready to shine and make that catch
-You chose to go RB by committee. In the reg season that’s ok but in the AFCCG?! James cook only 13 carries….85/2td. Ty and Davis get 8 carries?! For 23 yards and on the final drive for all the marbles the first carry is to Ray Davis!
Anyone on some ‘da refs’ on this one is a casual
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Breh we was all LAUGHING in the Texans thread about how many calls the Chiefs were getting. Now, do I think the Texans were gonna win? Not saying that but the refs definitely benefitted KC a lot in that game.
Now people gonna come in here and say TO a hall of fame WR with no ties to anything that's going on doesn't know what he's seeing
Now people gonna come in here and say TO a hall of fame WR with no ties to anything that's going on doesn't know what he's seeing
THIS IS OBVIOUSLY AFTER
THE BALL HIT THE GROUND
AND HE WRESTLED IT AWAY
Are you arguing for an INT or an incompletion?
He never had two hands on the ball. His second hand is reaching around but not on the ball:
Again what happened in the air didn't matter it's what happened when they landed.
AND they are the reason Mahomes is a Chief to begin with (due to accepting the Chiefs trade-up for him in the 2017 Draft)
BiLLs played themselves
They deserve all of those postseason Ls the Chiefs have been handing to them
Are you arguing for an INT or an incompletion?
He never had two hands on the ball. His second hand is reaching around but not on the ball:
Again what happened in the air didn't matter it's what happened when they landed.
HE HAS HIS RIGHTHAND ON THE BALL
AND HAS THE BALL
CUFFED INTO HIS LEFT ARM.
THATS THE EQUIVALENT
OF 2 HANDS
HAND ON THE BALL
AND HAS THE BALL
CUFFED INTO HIS LEFT ARM.
THATS THE EQUIVALENT
OF 2 HANDS
You didn't answer the question. Are you saying it's an INT or an incompletion.
I SAID FROM DAY ONE
THAT IT SHOULD BE
AN INT OR INCOMPLETION...
IM FINE WITH EITHER CALL.
THE ONE THING IT SHOULDN'T BE
IS A RECEPTION FOR KC.
EVEN WHEN BUF CHALLENGED
THEY EXPECTED AN INCOMPLETION
AT MINIMUM