Jack of Twitter is a bootlicker

[ineedsleep212]

I usually would just post this in some other thread that would be vaguely related or the random thread but




We supposed to put our faith in these silicon valley fukks huh?

 

[Red Shield]

If you were wondering why certain twitters were getting their accounts knocked off.. there ya go

 

[Ya' Cousin Cleon]

SilliCON valley

 

[dza]

he's still a cac from st louis

 

[fact]

They gonna go after this little bytch, lol, frail ass millionaires billionaires. He MUST be a maga/alt right puzzy, because he has enough juice with that platform and Trump/sycophants that he has the juice, beta ass cuck

 

[Black Panther]

he's still a cac from st louis

South side

We don't f*ck with them:cpagehubie:

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

not really...he just runs a social media site and wants to maintain impartiality. He kinda has to because conservatives bytch and moan so much.

 

[88m3]

they knew about the bots, they knew about Brexit, they knew about our election

 

[hashmander]

not really...he just runs a social media site and wants to maintain impartiality. He kinda has to because conservatives bytch and moan so much.

no he doesn't.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

"Let's murder minorities."
"No, let's not do that."

"Gotta remain impartial. So I'll ban the minorities complaining about the Nazis."

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

no he doesn't.

"Let's murder minorities."
"No, let's not do that."

"Gotta remain impartial. So I'll ban the minorities complaining about the Nazis."

why do you think Tim Cook can have his opinions on Russia and online trolls but Zuckerberg and Jack can't? They're in different businesses.

Thats the downside of social media companies.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

Another segment of the shill package revealed.

 

[ineedsleep212]

Another segment of the shill package revealed.

You know... just correcting the record.

 

[Let A Fro Be A Fro]

shyt has been obvious for a while. At first...

Asked whether Twitter would ever consider banning key government officials or even the president himself, a company spokesperson responded via email: “The Twitter Rules prohibit violent threats, harassment, hateful conduct, and multiple account abuse, and we will take action on accounts violating those policies.” Pressed on whether that meant that, hypothetically, Trump himself could be suspended were he to violate those policies, a spokesperson confirmed: “The Twitter Rules apply to all accounts, including verified accounts.”

Source: Slate’s Use of Your Data

..but then the cowardice was codified into policy.

Twitter's taking a tougher stance on threats of violence, but some groups are getting a bye.

On Monday, Twitter announced its latest push to curb abusive behavior on its social network by hate groups and organizations promoting violence. The antiviolence effort, though, has a limit.

"This policy does not apply to military or government entities and we will consider exceptions for groups that are currently engaging in (or have engaged in) peaceful resolution," Twitter wrote in its new policy, detailed on Monday.

That apparently means Twitter spats like the feud between Russia's and Ukraine's official accounts would be fine under the policy, as well as certain tweets from President Donald Trump, who has sent threats to North Korea through the social network on multiple occasions.

Source: Twitter’s violence rules don't apply to military, governments

He even went as far as to lick the boots of a bootlicker

 

[wtfyomom]

yeah I never liked or trusted them anyway. theyre basically just the nerd version of scamming that wall street type of people do. created a bunch of no inherent value having platforms and became the richest people in the country cause people are fukkin lazy. fukk them