James Baldwin is being cancelled on tiktok for “misogynoir”

KidJSoul

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
19,105
Reputation
3,847
Daps
83,117
Its hilarious because watching this video in full.... there's nothing misogynoir about him.

He was being myopic and at best ignorant about Black women's specific struggles. Which isnt good of course

But using misogynoir is going to conjure up imagery of him actually being malicious and advocating for strict controlling patriarchal views towards Black women. Which he didnt have.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
271
Reputation
363
Daps
1,978
IMG-4970.jpg


It’s tons of data that disproves her argument but even one of their own knew it was a lot of virtue signaling and performing going on. Baldwin just echoed the common sentiment of what most saw at the time.

:mjpls:
 

Kiyoshi-Dono

Veteran
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
88,545
Reputation
33,870
Daps
474,389
Reppin
Petty Vandross.. fukk Yall
So she basically @the cac mamba of tik tok
I’ve seen nikkas dap rhetoric of his that’s just as stupid
Coli nikkas equal the bird bytches that let this white bytch get comfortable to get her shyt off
But I was also the bad guy for calling B.Simone an ain’t shyt bytch for wearing coochie cutters to preach a sermon
While she also was the beginning of throwing smut on MLKs name
Again yall nikkas don’t stand on shyt
Too scared to correct nikkas and bytches of her ilk in real life and on this forum
But I guarantee you will throw a hissy fit just cause
 
Last edited:

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,750
Reputation
9,865
Daps
175,653
No clicks but I was reading about the movie "The Exorcist".

Mannnnnnmn he dismantled that movie to the point it made them terrified cacs look wild goofy.


By Emily Temple



August 2, 2022, 10:13am

Though James Baldwin is best known and loved for his novels, essays, and oratory, he is not frequently remembered as a great film critic—though, as Noah Berlatsky wrote in The Atlantic, he should be. In 1976, Baldwin published The Devil Finds Work, a book-length essay about his life watching movies, and about the politics of art in America, and nature of film itself.

In the book’s final section, he has a few things to say about The Exorcist, which after its 1973 release became the first horror film to be nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture, and which still frequently tops lists of the all-time best films. Baldwin did not like it. “The film, or its ambience, reminded me of The Godfather, both being afflicted with the same pious ambiguity,” he writes.

Ambiguity is not quite the word, for the film’s intention is not at all ambiguous; yet, hypocrisy is not quite the word, either, since it suggests a more deliberate and sophisticated level of cunning. The Exorcist is desperately compulsive, and compulsive, precisely, in the terror of its unbelief. The vast quantities of tomato paste expended in The Godfather are meant to suggest vast reservoirs of courage, devotion, and nobility, qualities with which the film is not in the least concerned—and which, apart from Brando’s performance, are never present in it. (And, at that, it is probably more accurate to speak of Brando’s presence, a pride, an agony, an irreducible dignity.) The Exorcist has absolutely nothing going for it, except Satan, who is certainly the star: I can say only that Satan was never like that when he crossed my path (for one thing, the evil one never so rudely underestimated me). His concerns were more various, and his methods more subtle. The Exorcist is not in the least concerned with damnation, an abysm far beyond the confines of its imagination, but with property, with safety, tax shelters, stocks and bonds, rising and falling markets, the continued invulnerability of a certain class of people, and the continued sanctification of a certain history. If The Exorcist itself believed that history, it could scarcely be reduced to so abject a dependence on special effects.

Baldwin was raised in the Pentecostal faith and was even a teenage preacher for a few years before leaving the church, so it’s safe to say he was rather more educated about the devil than most people, and was therefore particularly poised to unpack the religious implications of The Exorcist, as well as the racial undertones—always in that glorious, muscular, exuberant prose. Later on, he writes:

For, I have seen the devil, by day and by night, and have seen him in you and in me: in the eyes of the cop and the sheriff and the deputy, the landlord, the housewife, the football player: in the eyes of some governors, presidents, wardens, in the eyes of some orphans, and in the eyes of my father, and in my mirror. It is that moment when no other human being is real for you, nor are you real for yourself. The devil has no need of any dogma—though he can use them all—nor does he need any historical justification, history being so largely his invention. He does not levitate beds, or fool around with little girls: we do.

The mindless and hysterical banality of evil presented in The Exorcist is the most terrifying thing about the film. The Americans should certainly know more about evil than that; if they pretend otherwise, they are lying, and any black man, and not only blacks—many, many others, including white children— can call them on this lie, he who has been treated as the devil recognizes the devil when they meet.

You can read the Baldwin’s full remarks on The Exorcist here—but the whole book is very much worth your time.
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
51,211
Reputation
8,640
Daps
149,507
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
Wow. This Gen Z white girl who probably found out about James Baldwin in her African American literature class really made me reexamine his works in a more critical light.

Said no one ever.
 
Top