So it's ok to write hit pieces and portray folks in a negative light to get views is what you are saying? You know there is plenty of SALACIOUS topics to write about that draw views without shytting on your people. "Whose fukking who" "Who said what on Twitter" but to shyt on your people for WEB TRAFFIC is the epitome of what bed wenching is about. and as editor she does have the power to green lit content. How much would she have cost Ebony in libel lawsuits to settle with him? How come she doesn't get at the WS feminist? How come she does not shine a light on anything positive Tariq is doing if she was unbiased (And don't act like he ain't done noteworthy stuff)
You keep making excuses for her and I keep finding holes in every single one of your arguments.
What i'm saying is Black media is "hit pieces" it's the way Black media is preserving itself at this time.
Sadly, until we are able to fund our projects and have figure out a way to get advertisers to advertise on our platforms without them having to be "entertainment and gossip" -- "hit pieces" is what keeps traffic and campaigns coming in.
We will not agree on any piece where someone is going in on Tariq and his use of "Bedwench" -- I can't get down with that. I'm very vocal about it as well.
So, to you she was shytting on Tariq for his use or "Bedwench?" What was "libel" or wrong in her statements. It's an "op-ed" -- aka opinion piece. He has opinions and makes it known. She's responding to his opinions and statements.
How come Tariq doesn't focus his energy on trolling White women/men who do hit pieces on Black people? Why come after Black people who he feels doesn't kiss his ass or agree with him.
Everything Tariq does is self-interested. And he should do something after taking money from people to create his products and then he makes the revenue. He doesn't take any losses. It's beautiful for him,