Jamilah is having some financial trouble.

[GoldCoastSaint]

Im hoping she was joking about the white folks part. Doesn't seem like a Black activist would say something like that and mean it.

As for her card not working, it happens. Happened to me at Target for fukking $24.17. I have several stacks on that one card, but Chase shut me down for buying more bitcoin the night before. Card problems doesn't equal money problems.

I dont know any of these people, including Tariq. I remember his pimpology days when I was young, but he seems to have become an activist of sorts. These two should not be fighting in public.

 

[Apollo Creed]

I'm smashing

She’s a duck

 

[Gravity]

1) How can one even engage with Tariq - he won't allow you to speak or engage with him. I have never seen any interview or date with Tariq where he allows anyone to get their points off. He's over-talks them and speaks over them. He's not a debater or even skilled in engaging in a two-way convo.

These are lies and you’re a liar. You don’t get respect because you’re full of shyt just like Lemieux.

2) I am not on Twitter - but I see a lot of what she "pops." And she pops just as much shyt as Tariq.

Tariq has no problem engaging people that he doesn’t agree with. You can find countless examples of him debating folk that are opposed to his viewpoints whether it’s black feminists or white supremacists. You can’t pull up one example of this chic debating a black man who is opposed to her feminist ideology. The closest that you’ll get is her breakfast club appearance and her dealing with the slight push back that she got from Charlemagne.

3) I can't speak on Black Feminism. But, I know it doesn't make you a "c00n" -- I know that much. That's generalizing. I don't use the word "c00n" -- but if I did - I would def apply it to Tariq.

You're a c00n. A not too bright c00n to be even more specific.

4) I can speak on whatever I want. Especially, when in comes to the Black Men I know and have been around all my life. And their examples have shown me what a "real man" is and acts like. And Tariq aint one. Just how you and others wanna say what a Black woman is and aint. I will can and will do the same.

Yes, you can speak on whatever you want but you’re not qualified to speak on what men do and don’t do because you’re not a man. Your take on how men are supposed to act doesn’t mean a gotdamn thing. I never say things like “real women don’t do this.....a real women wouldn’t do that”. If I want to criticize the behavior of a black woman then I criticize the behavior. Displaying behavior that I don’t like or agree with doesn’t negate a female’s womanhood. I don’t agree with you, but I wouldn’t say that you’re not a woman because I don’t agree.

5) I wasn't down with Nate Parker due to a number of his comments - I watched it anyway with my man. I also didn't watch the interview. But, just like Tariq she is allowed her opinion. Like anyone else. Challenge it with facts not emotions - that's all I can say.

This isn’t about anyone trying to deny her right to an opinion. You asked why I called her a c00n and I explained why. Her opinion to side with whites against Cosby and Parker makes her a c00n.

6) I have heard Tariq say don't fukk with BW - mess with Mixed Women with a white mom. I have heard him say Black single mothers are the issues in the community while ignoring BM leaving these women.

You’re a liar.

So, if you wanna be real -Tariq spits a lot of rhetoric around BW as well. And Tariq fronts like he is deflecting "white supremacy" - but we know it's a lie. You can't fight white supremacy with a White mother in law and hiring White folks for a Black doc.

Tariq doesn’t criticizes particular types of black women. He doesn’t generalize black women befatively like Lemieux and black feminists do black men.

Whites can certainly maintain white supremacy even if they have blacks in their family and have blacks on their payroll. White corporations have millions of blacks working for them, does that stop them from maintaining white supremacy? Donald Sterling owned an NBA team with damn near all black players, did that stop him from practicing white supremacy? You have no point here. Dude having a white mother in law and whites on some whites on his payroll does no contradict his stance on opposition to white supremacy. You’re not being real you’re just being dumb. You haven’t made one valid point.

Thanks. "I couldn't give a fukk" about how you feel That's better

You’re welcome. It’s a shame that you needed to be schooled on elementary school level grammar tho.

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

She’s a duck

Still smash

 

[h2o_proof]

I'm sorry I disappointed you. But, what was wrong with what I stated? It's the truth. ALL websites do this. Especially, Black websites. It's the Black "think-piece" generation.

Now and in the future, I will continue to be truthful as I can in my statements. No credibility or validation needed.

It boils down to what @4d 6f 6e 65 79 said in the thread, and I'm paraphrasing, but all of a sudden the rules only apply to Tariq?? You lose credibility when you frame your argument with "Jamilah was just the editor" or "black publications need the traffic" to justify her lack of journalistic integrity and accountability. In the construct of the same argument, you don't afford Tariq that luxury, why not?

I'm not invested enough into either one of them to have a dog in the fight, but I can't stand when we don't argue fairly, just a pet peeve of mine

 

[xoxodede]

1) ASSUMPTIONS now are a reason to slander people's name? Link these alleged sources???? You can't because they don't exist. The most you will find is Youtube video of some broke nikka hating. Dr.Dre built a whole career off NOT BEING AN ACTUAL DOCTOR but he has portrayed himself as one in AUDIO and PRINT as a doctor.

Tariq is using all of that for self-projects. He donates cause he makes money from creating that website, films and projects from donations and the revenue from the projects he creates from donations.
Did you just criticize a black man for having a profitable business and donating back to the community he speaks on?

3) Tariq spends most of his time from what I can see going at other Black people. Not White people.
In my previous response I literally gave you links where he gets at white people. Not only did you NOT acknowledge it you are literally repeating the SAME question and it's only because you don't want to acknowledge you were wrong the first go round so your throw the "FROM WHAT I CAN SEE" part in cuz you think it's gonna cover your ass.


I know your end goal was to come in here and shyt on Tariq but in the process you are making your self look real cuz you don't have real arguments. Once you opinion gets debunked you become dismissive. I see why you hate the word Bedwench

Hit dogs holla

1) Exactly. Lots of assumptions are thrown around on all sides. And it needs to stop.

2) I'm not criticizing -- nor did I. I am calling it out for what it is. He needs to donate and people should expect him too -- and ask him too even more - since it's their money going into his pockets and creating financial stability and feeding his family/business.

3) Acknowledged. But, are you going to acknowledge his behavior and the childish activities he engages in -- in terms of his fellow Black men and women. Even playing into colorism. Is that cool? Or honorable to do? Is that a good look when fighting "white supremacy?"

I guess. I'm very open in how I feel about Tariq. I am not making myself look anyway. And if I am - who CARES what some dudes on a forum and jock Tariq think of me..lol. I won't let someone go in on someone for no reason - because their cult leader think it's cool.

I hate bedwench - cause it's disrespectful to our ancestors - but that's something you clearly don't get. And at this point -- I don't expect you too either.

Later

 

[O.G.B]

Card problems doesn't can equal money problems.

Fixed!

 

[Citi Trends]

Why y'all keep going back and forth with the same people in here? You already know their views and capings

 

[xoxodede]

It boils down to what @4d 6f 6e 65 79 said in the thread, and I'm paraphrasing, but all of a sudden the rules only apply to Tariq?? You lose credibility when you frame your argument with "Jamilah was just the editor" or "black publications need the traffic" to justify her lack of journalistic integrity and accountability. In the construct of the same argument, you don't afford Tariq that luxury, why not?

I'm not invested enough into either one of them to have a dog in the fight, but I can't stand when we don't argue fairly, just a pet peeve of mine

Is any publications or did Jamilah go at Tariq about something personal and non-view related. Tariq is going in about her about her card being declined. Petty.

And honestly, what was wrong about her posting or approving anything she posted. Both were pieces, Ebony felt they wanted to cover. Those two post - had nothing to do with integrity or accountability. I was stating that publications and editors -- ALL types -- approve of content --for traffic purposes. That is sadly media. Boycott all media until it changes.

 

[xoxodede]

These are lies and you’re a liar. You don’t get respect because you’re full of shyt just like Lemieux.

Tariq has no problem engaging people that he doesn’t agree with. You can find countless examples of him debating folk that are opposed to his viewpoints whether it’s black feminists or white supremacists. You can’t pull up one example of this chic debating a black man who is opposed to her feminist ideology. The closest that you’ll get is her breakfast club appearance and her dealing with the slight push back that she got from Charlemagne.

You're a c00n. A not too bright c00n to be even more specific.

Yes, you can speak on whatever you want but you’re not qualified to speak on what men do and don’t do because you’re not a man. Your take on how men are supposed to act doesn’t mean a gotdamn thing. I never say things like “real women don’t do this.....a real women wouldn’t do that”. If I want to criticize the behavior of a black woman then I criticize the behavior. Displaying behavior that I don’t like or agree with doesn’t negate a female’s womanhood. I don’t agree with you, but I wouldn’t say that you’re not a woman because I don’t agree.

This isn’t about anyone trying to deny her right to an opinion. You asked why I called her a c00n and I explained why. Her opinion to side with whites against Cosby and Parker makes her a c00n.

You’re a liar.

Tariq doesn’t criticizes particular types of black women. He doesn’t generalize black women befatively like Lemieux and black feminists do black men.

Whites can certainly maintain white supremacy even if they have blacks in their family and have blacks on their payroll. White corporations have millions of blacks working for them, does that stop them from maintaining white supremacy? Donald Sterling owned an NBA team with damn near all black players, did that stop him from practicing white supremacy? You have no point here. Dude having a white mother in law and whites on some whites on his payroll does no contradict his stance on opposition to white supremacy. You’re not being real you’re just being dumb. You haven’t made one valid point.

You’re welcome. It’s a shame that you needed to be schooled on elementary school level grammar tho.

Sure.

 

[Doobie Doo]

1) Exactly. Lots of assumptions are thrown around on all sides. And it needs to stop.

2) I'm not criticizing -- nor did I. I am calling it out for what it is. He needs to donate and people should expect him too -- and ask him too even more - since it's their money going into his pockets and creating financial stability and feeding his family/business.

3) Acknowledged. But, are you going to acknowledge his behavior and the childish activities he engages in -- in terms of his fellow Black men and women. Even playing into colorism. Is that cool? Or honorable to do? Is that a good look when fighting "white supremacy?"

I guess. I'm very open in how I feel about Tariq. I am not making myself look anyway. And if I am - who CARES what some dudes on a forum and jock Tariq think of me..lol. I won't let someone go in on someone for no reason - because their cult leader think it's cool.

I hate bedwench - cause it's disrespectful to our ancestors - but that's something you clearly don't get. And at this point -- I don't expect you too either.

Later

You hate bedwench because the term applies to you once your opinions and thoughts are out there and mentioning our "Ancestors" is just you using their memory as shield to hide and deflect behind when people get at you. Trust me, ancestors like Malcolm X, Marcus Garvey, WEB DuBois would be getting at your ass harder than I am for these c00nish responses you throwing out.


Your ideology and constant caping for these black feminist is more disrespectful to our ancestors then the term Bedwench

 

[Henri Christophe]

She was a editor - sometimes you gotta publish stuff you don't like or approve of. You also have to write stuff you don't approve of.

For what? Just for money?

Might as well be a prostitute.

How can you respect someone who puts money above their integrity?

Nobody should be going against their morals just for a check... Thats hoe behavior

 

[xoxodede]

You hate bedwench because the term applies to you once your opinions and thoughts are out there and mentioning our "Ancestors" is just you using their memory as shield to hide and deflect behind when people get at you. Trust me, ancestors like Malcolm X, Marcus Garvey, WEB DuBois would be getting at your ass harder than I am for these c00nish responses you throwing out.


Your ideology and constant caping for these black feminist is more disrespectful to our ancestors then the term Bedwench

I really don't give a fukk about what you think about me. LOL. Trust and know that

I am solid on who I am and what I believe. You haven't gotten in my ass nor anyone else's but Tariq's. You seem to like the view - so stay there

 

[xoxodede]

For what? Just for money?

Might as well be a prostitute.

How can you respect someone who puts money above their integrity?

Nobody should be going against their morals just for a check... Thats hoe behavior

It's called having a job at a magazine/online pub.

For many, it's also called working for a company/corporation.

When someone works for someone besides themselves -- sometimes their integrity and morals are challenged.

But, I don't see anything Jamilah wrote or approved went against hers. I haven't seen these "anti-BM" pieces people are claiming. I have seen the other pieces that were cited - that were covered. And I don't see any issue. "Bedwench" is problematic.

 

[Rell84shots]

Clown other Afrikans for having financial troubles, brehs.

fukk that, This chick has been talking reckless about black men too much.