null
...
xCivicx: me no hever see no raatid space selfie
coli: **shows xCivicx a space selfie**
xCivicx: me still no hever see no raatid space selfie
coli: **shrug**
Japan has succesfully retrieved material from an asteroid
- Thread starter God Almighty
- Start date
xCivicx: me no hever see no raatid space selfie
coli: **shows xCivicx a space selfie**
xCivicx: me still no hever see no raatid space selfie
coli: **shrug**
xCivicx: why are there no space selfies
Space zealots: **posts "photos" with no stars in them**
xCivicx: **repeats question**
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
null
...
you know why there are no stars in most pics in space?
or do you know the <xCivicx>excuse</xCivicx> for why ..?
null
...
He's going to say it's Photoshop or shot in Arizona somewhere.
like they couldn't "photoshop" in some stars if they wanted to ...
I know that theres no atmosphere refracting light in space
I know that many physicists have stated that stars should be at their most visible and brightest in space
I know that if you cant see stars in space then you shouldnt be able to see the sun in space
I also know that i minored in physics at GT so i most likely know more than you about the subject
Yet they never do
They put stars in video games and movies to make everything look as authentic as possible yet there are never any stars in real "photos"
That literally does not make sense
null
...
I know that theres no atmosphere refracting light in space
I know that many physicists have stated that stars should be at their most visible and brightest in space
I know that if you cant see stars in space then you shouldnt be able to see the sun in space
I also know that i minored in physics at GT so i most likely know more than you about the subject
then you should know that the image a camera takes is not the same as the one your eyes take.
tut tut.
then you should know that the image a camera takes is not the same as the one your eyes take.
And you should know that this has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that stars should be visible in space
The higher your elevation on earth, the less atmosphere you have around you, the more stars you can see
Then when you reach what is "supposed to be" your highest elevation("space") the stars disappear
This does not make sense. At all
Also, those "hypothetical theoretical" mental masturbation videos dont move me
null
...
And you should know that this has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that stars should be visible in space
The higher your elevation on earth, the less atmosphere you have around you, the more stars you can see
Then when you reach what is "supposed to be" your highest elevation("space") the stars disappear
This does not make sense. At all
Also, those "hypothetical theoretical" mental masturbation videos dont move me
Three things ..
1. The picture a camera takes is NOT what "you see". Not sure why that keeps escaping you.
2. GT .... not really something to boast about.
3. That video on Hawking Radiation is not "mental m...." as you put it. Here try the original paper instead if that makes you feel better https://www.brainmaster.com/software/pubs/physics/Hawking Particle Creation.pdf
p.s. I would link a video to how cameras work but GT physics grads should already know
Sorry but this is yet another post where youre not saying anything at all
You got years and years and years of evidence of "astronauts" giving conflicting reports on whether they personally saw stars in space, yet you keep trying to narrow the convo down to cameras
Again, youre out of your element here
I know that if you cant see stars in space then you shouldnt be able to see the sun in space
I also know that i minored in physics at GT so i most likely know more than you about the subject
Then you should know that you see the sun because it's only two planets away, much much closer than the closest star. Stars also aren't going to be as visible because of the brightness of the Sun relative to the stars behind it. Like the light in an interrogation room, or a police flashlight in your face. Everything behind it losses visibility. Off-Topic: I know for a fact you don't believe none of the shyt you say, you just hate people who seemingly have "blind faith" in science, without the why's to back up their beliefs. This is in contrast to religion, which you believe is the only thing worthy of blind faith.